382 Stroker LS1 Dyno Results!
FWIW- There's almost always some thing left on the table depending on the source. It gives us room for improvement. You will not be disappointed in your cars performance. If someone wants to question your set up.....just drag there *** and I'll put up half the $$$. Good luck.
BTW- watch out for me and the lil' lady. We'll be out on the prowl before long.

James
I also agree that the cam is too small. Add a bigger cam and take off those cats and you will be at 470+.
BTW, can anyone give me details or a link to the electric water pump?
Mike..take muh word..that cam is killing you in the HP department w/that 382..there's NO reason why you can't get close to 500 w/a bigger cam..hell stock cid motors with 5.3L heads and the G5X2 are putting down more power than your 382...and I'm knockin on it's door w/my stock cid motor and X1 cam. I would DEFINATLY suggest a bigger cam and since they're CAKE to change out since you've got springs there's really no reason to stick w/it.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
The new LG car that did 450 something RWHP only had 401 TQ. HP nice but Torque gets you down the 1/4 mile. Like Tony said this is my daily driver. To be honest i still think the cam is to big.
The new LG car that did 450 something RWHP only had 401 TQ. HP nice but Torque gets you down the 1/4 mile. Like Tony said this is my daily driver. To be honest i still think the cam is to big.
Josey ill run ya for fun. But my car doesnt hook at all until mid 2nd gear.
Josey ill run ya for fun. But my car doesnt hook at all until mid 2nd gear.
sure does everyone always ask me about that!!
I applaud you for building a combo that is right for you. Having been hot-rodding stuff for a long time now, I know the temptation to try and eek more power out of something, only to find that driveability can become a PITA.
Anyway, I'm curious as to why you chose the 382. Pardon my rookie question, but I'm new(er) to LSX engines and do not know that much about the available stroker kits (advantages/disadvantages) except what all these engine builders/tuners post about (382, 387, 422, etc).
When I do one, I will be more than happy with 450rwhp N/A, and I want to keep the revs sane like you did (6700rpm or so). I don't care if I make less HP/CI so long as its 100% streetable, PASSES Texas smog (which I realize right now is easy for an OBD-II car, but we'll have to pass a real sniffer soon in the metro areas), and has outstanding reliability (I'm not changing valvesprings every 10k miles, and I don't want to rings and bearings every other year either). I'm not building a race car, but I will certainly keep my 100-125hp shot of nitrous on it as well.
Thanks for any insight you can offer. Sounds like you nailed it for what YOU wanted to do this time around.



