Dyno Guesses & Bench Racing Forum Horsepower Estimates | Racing Scenarios

C5 Z06 vs BMW M3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2009, 10:34 AM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
SiL3NtXWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default C5 Z06 vs BMW M3

My buddy claims his M3 will beat me on a road course and that the only thing I have the advantage on are the straights. He says his car weighs a lot less, and it will out handle me because of 50/50 weight distribution.

I am an experienced road course driver. He is not.

04 C5 Z06
Lowered
Good rubber
Tunnel plate
Poly bushings all the way around
Baer/Hawk brake components
Full Exhaust
Vortech T-Trim


2009 BMW M3
Stock


Compare.

Last edited by SiL3NtXWS6; 05-05-2009 at 09:15 AM.
Old 04-26-2009, 11:06 AM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Sarge_13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Schertz, Texas
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Your car would rape him. The M3 is a great stock car for attacking a road course but your modded Z06 would kill him.
Old 04-26-2009, 11:12 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
SiL3NtXWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

What about stock vs stock?
Old 04-26-2009, 12:01 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Sarge_13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Schertz, Texas
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SiL3NtXWS6
What about stock vs stock?
I'd give the nod to the Z06 there as well. The M3 has peak power, but no power under the curve. If you have a very good driver in the M3 it would be really close.
Old 04-26-2009, 12:06 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Charles MO
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SiL3NtXWS6
My buddy claims his M3 will beat me on a road course and that the only thing I have the advantage on are the straights. He says his car weighs a lot less, and it "will own me" because of 50/50 weight distribution.

I am an experienced road course driver. He is not.

04 C5 Z06
Lowered
Good rubber
Tunnel plate
Poly bushings all the way around
Baer/Hawk brake components
Full Exhaust
Vortech T-Trim


2009 BMW M3
Stock


Compare.
Your buddy is an idiot.
Your car also has perfect 50/50 weight distribution, and has a huge weight advantage. Given the same driver in both stock cars the C5 Z06 would walk away from the M3...
Old 04-26-2009, 07:05 PM
  #6  
Launching!
 
David_viny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JD_AMG
Your buddy is an idiot.
+1

The Corvette is a true sports car. The M3, at least the 4th generation he has, is like a sporty every day car. There great for there category, but not great competition for a sports car. There older ones, especially the CSL's are the good handling ones.

And stock for stock the c5 z06 is 589lbs lighter LOL. The z06 is 3,115 lbs and the M3 is 3,704 lbs(a little more if its a sedan, over 4,000lbs if its a convertible).

AND the C5 z06 did the Nürburgring (Huge awesome track in Germany) 5 seconds faster then the M3.

*edit* Z06 is 9 sec faster not 5

Last edited by David_viny; 05-03-2009 at 02:13 AM.
Old 04-26-2009, 07:20 PM
  #7  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
fccs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Wow is that a joke? A stock fbody is faster then a m3, ive raced my buddies 2000 bmw m3 stock for stock so I can attest to that!
Old 04-26-2009, 07:45 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
SiL3NtXWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

This dude is serious

Last edited by SiL3NtXWS6; 05-05-2009 at 09:14 AM.
Old 04-26-2009, 09:02 PM
  #9  
Launching!
 
David_viny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ehhh hes in Denial then. He probably knows the truth, just cant admit it.
Old 04-28-2009, 06:25 PM
  #10  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
fccs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

You know what, I just noticed its a 2009 m3, not a 1999 LOL. Ok well a fbody probably wouldnt win stock for stock but your c5z06 should easily. You make around the same power as them stock but your much more aerodynamic and built for speeding. If that was a 99 it wouldnt even be a match obviously, but a 2009 should be interesting. you WILL still win though, probably by 2cars or more as a guarantee
Old 04-28-2009, 07:05 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
SiL3NtXWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by fccs
You know what, I just noticed its a 2009 m3, not a 1999 LOL. Ok well a fbody probably wouldnt win stock for stock but your c5z06 should easily. You make around the same power as them stock but your much more aerodynamic and built for speeding. If that was a 99 it wouldnt even be a match obviously, but a 2009 should be interesting. you WILL still win though, probably by 2cars or more as a guarantee
with my t-trim i hope to drag his *** pretty good...
Old 05-02-2009, 11:42 PM
  #12  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (11)
 
integraxtc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago, northside
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by David_viny
+1



AND the C5 z06 did the Nürburgring (Huge awesome track in Germany) 5 seconds faster then the M3.
is this for the vs the 2009 m3?

If so, the c5 z06, is a pretty damn impressive car. More so, than I thought (or had given it credit for). It's a stalwart.
Old 05-03-2009, 02:06 AM
  #13  
Launching!
 
David_viny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by integraxtc
is this for the vs the 2009 m3?

If so, the c5 z06, is a pretty damn impressive car. More so, than I thought (or had given it credit for). It's a stalwart.
Well at least according to the chart on Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordsch...test_lap_times

Shows the BMW M3 E92 (2007-present) at 8:05, C5 Z06 at 7:56. Guess I messed up the math, the Z06 is 9 sec faster, not 5

Last edited by David_viny; 05-03-2009 at 02:14 AM. Reason: Spelling.....
Old 05-03-2009, 03:33 AM
  #14  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (5)
 
KFC_Or_Bust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

LOL.

People like the OP's buddy are one of my reasons for living. I had a friend like this at one time, pretty much the only reason for keeping him around was to hear (and laugh) at the rediculous **** he'd spew out on a daily basis. He made a bold statement that the, then new, C6 Vette's weighed so much more than his 89 Caprice and because it had the 9C1 police package he'd keep up with one no problem.

Anyways, with your tool friend, I say race him on the track, loser pays the others track fee for the day. Get it on film too, his excuses would be epic.
Old 05-05-2009, 09:37 AM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
SiL3NtXWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Daniel Conner
C5 Z06 :
Is 5 seconds faster than the 2009 M3 on the Nuremberg road course. Even faster for previous generations.
Weighs 590 lbs less than the M3
Has perfect 50/50 weight distribution
Runs 11.9 vs 12.7 M3 (1/4 mile) stock vs stock
Has an awesome coefficient of drag
Has larger, stickier tires
Has a stiffer suspension
Costs way less

Game over, I don't want to hear any more haha
April 26 at 7:52pm · Comment · Like
And his response:

Alexander V
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IWS9qr1U-0
Thought you might like this video. And.. i still have not come up with a response to your comment haha, but it shouldn't be too hard to find.

Daniel Conner
it was actually 9 seconds faster lol

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordsch...test_lap_times
And his response:

Alexander V
Danny, my friend, you can't compare the i6 M3 to the 2009 V8!! Those times are for the 2003 bmw m3 3.0L i6, which has 360hp compared to 420 on the 09 model. Now... first, let me point out the fact that the m3 is capable of producing 105bhp/L compared to 67bhp/L that the z06 puts out. When taking into account weight, the m3 produces slightly less per klb: 115bhp/klb compared to 123bhp/klb. BUT... they have taken basically everything out of the corvette to get the weight down to what it is. The M3 is a luxury sport sedan whereas the z06 is purely a sports car. If you took out all the soundproofing, back seats, etc. out of the m3 and stripped it down to it's essentials (which is essentially what chevrolet did), i guarantee you the m3 would be running circles around the z06 . Oh.. and the z06 does not have perfect 50:50, its 51:49 haha. Oh and btw... 2009 m3 is faster on the track, just hard to find track times. Check that site.
http://www.fastestlaps.com/index.php?page_id=compare

Daniel Conner
You are only confirming my point....Yes, the Z06 is a true sports car. The M3 is not, it's not even in the same category.. which is why it's slower. Besides, even if you took all the crap that you said out of the M3, what makes you think you could make up for 580 lbs? I took 450 lbs out of my old car and i tell you what, it took a lot more than just what you mentioned.

Yeah, hp/l is ricer math in case you didn't know. It's what little import guys try to do to gain an advantage over the long lived SBC. When you step up to the V8 stage it's no longer a valid argument (hence BMW's first gen V8 which is far from impressive). BMW- It turns some RPMs, yes, but only because it is a big bore V8... with no stroke (torque)

And what the hell is horsepower per lb?

8 :05 BMW M3 E92 (the v8 model)

7:56 Chevrolet Corvette C5 Z06 (This is stock. My car is far from stock..)
Old 05-05-2009, 09:38 AM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
SiL3NtXWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yes, he tried to post a drifting video of a c6z vs a M3 on a wet donut. lolz
Old 05-05-2009, 02:58 PM
  #17  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
PNYKLR-TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

wow your friend is a make-up bag. . . not a tool bag. tool bags understand cars but are just stupid . . . make-up bags are pretty boys like your friend.

Old 05-05-2009, 04:16 PM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Charles MO
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

I've got a better response for you.

Originally Posted by SiL3NtXWS6
Alexander V
Danny, my friend, you can't compare the i6 M3 to the 2009 V8!! Those times are for the 2003 bmw m3 3.0L i6, which has 360hp compared to 420 on the 09 model.
No, those times are for the 2009 E92 M3, the 360hp E46 M3 ran significantly slower (8:22 slower still than a Z51 C5, which lapped 8:18 by SportAuto).

Now... first, let me point out the fact that the m3 is capable of producing 105bhp/L compared to 67bhp/L that the z06 puts out.
First let me point out that hp/l is completely and utterly irrelevant when comparing engines. Displacement does not represent any important real world figures such as weight or physical size, and peak hp shows very little about how the car accelerates. If you pull your head out of your *** you will find that the "inefficient" LS6 is not only lighter, but physically smaller, and cheaper than BMW's 4L V8. So which would you rather have, the lighter smaller cheaper engine with near as much power(and a way better torque curve), or the heavier, bulkier more expensive one you have to rev to the moon to get moving?
Unless you can come up with some logical argument to defend hp/l with real world figures, so far Z06 -1; E92 -0.
Old 05-05-2009, 04:20 PM
  #19  
TECH Resident
 
CraZee ZO6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I own both cars. 2009 M3 dct tranny. One hell of a car but so is the c5z. STOCK VS STOCK the c5z would get it at the road coarse. Zo6 weighs less 3100 vs 3600. Similar power but z also has better grip 1.01G to .9something
Old 05-08-2009, 06:23 PM
  #20  
Teching In
 
mulalleybs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Your friend is an idiot. Just like alot of mine. Funny that its an m3 though because one of my co workers thinks his m3 is faster than my z06 aswell. "blah blah my car weights less and has almost the same amount of power" as he was saying this i was thinking there is no way in hell his car weighs less than 3100 lbs being a 4 door luxury car. I look it up and its over 3700 lbs, ofcourse i was right.. Anyway now that i put a supercharger and some other stuff on my car my friends try to argue with me that lambo's and gsx-r 750s would smoke my car blah blah this blah blah. Even funnier, while i type this a friend was saying m3s are wicked fast and would beat my car on any track with curves. Someone else from work said..lmao...that their mini cooper would take my car on a track. What my friends don't realize and what they don't do is that i do extensive amounts of research when im bored w/nothing to do at work so as to not spit out stupid bullshit that they quite frequently do.

Last edited by mulalleybs; 05-08-2009 at 06:36 PM.


Quick Reply: C5 Z06 vs BMW M3



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 PM.