Dyno Guesses & Bench Racing Forum Horsepower Estimates | Racing Scenarios

Has anyone run a new 5.0??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-2010, 12:47 PM
  #21  
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
 
devonsZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i saw one leaving base while i was sittin in line at the gate, he gave me that im better than you smurk, ill make sure to wipe it off his face first chance i get
Old 07-07-2010, 01:05 PM
  #22  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ju1ce
Really? Show me proof of... let's say... 5 different stock auto GT's doing 12.50's.
You are only saying this because you know it's not possible to do. The 5.0 just came out. Only a handful of people that own them are running them on the track. I doubt there is even 5 videos of ANYONE running the 5.0 on a track that isn't a shop or magazine.
Shop cars don't count and neither do Magazine times.
Magazine times are usually SLOWER than the car's potential.

Again, I've sat all day long at tracks seeing GTOs like yours hit high 13s low 14s stock. I would never go on a car board and act as if that was the best the car can do. That would be seen as borderline trolling.

Hell, 13.3-13.5 times are decent stock 3v times. I am sure a 4v with over 100 extra HP can get a bit faster than that don't you think?

I mean I surely hope you aren't attempting to say that an auto 5.0 GT runs low to mid 13s stock. If you are, you are one of the few left that is.
Old 07-07-2010, 01:16 PM
  #23  
Teching In
 
Ju1ce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ke^in
You are only saying this because you know it's not possible to do. The 5.0 just came out. Only a handful of people that own them are running them on the track. I doubt there is even 5 videos of ANYONE running the 5.0 on a track that isn't a shop or magazine.

Magazine times are usually SLOWER than the car's potential.

Again, I've sat all day long at tracks seeing GTOs like yours hit high 13s low 14s stock. I would never go on a car board and act as if that was the best the car can do. That would be seen as borderline trolling.

Hell, 13.3-13.5 times are decent stock 3v times. I am sure a 4v with over 100 extra HP can get a bit faster than that don't you think?

I mean I surely hope you aren't attempting to say that an auto 5.0 GT runs low to mid 13s stock. If you are, you are one of the few left that is.
If you know there's less than 5 videos of stock GT's running that aren't shop cars or mag tests how can you sit there and say "stock auto GT's run 12.50's." That's yet to be seen. What I do know is this guy was dead hooking in an auto at 900-1000 DA and running 13.2-13.3 @ about 108 (which is where everyone with a brain was pinning these cars).

The stick version with 3.73's and the perf package or whatever will crack 12's here and there, but for the most part these cars will be 13 second cars.

My GTO bone stock everything and full weight ran 13.018 @ 109 so it's just about right on par with what I'd expect.

While mag times are usually slower, in this car they're quicker. It's already been leaked that the motor trend tests were inflated to help ford create hype for this car. A guy working for motor trend posted pictures of the car (which was a 3.73 geard perf package car) that they also threw smaller wheels on and better rear tires to achieve their times. They also ran in ridiculous air. He was quickly banned from the Mustang board and thread deleted within 6 hours of posting everything.
Old 07-07-2010, 01:20 PM
  #24  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ju1ce
If you know there's less than 5 videos of stock GT's running that aren't shop cars or mag tests how can you sit there and say "stock auto GT's run 12.50's." That's yet to be seen. What I do know is this guy was dead hooking in an auto at 900-1000 DA and running 13.2-13.3 @ about 108 (which is where everyone with a brain was pinning these cars).

The stick version with 3.73's and the perf package or whatever will crack 12's here and there, but for the most part these cars will be 13 second cars.
Again, someone is in denial. Stock S197 3vs are running mid to low 13s stock now. The fastest I've seen a non-magazine non shop one run stock was 13.2. So what you are saying is, the same car, with bettering gearing, DOHC instead of SOHC, and 4vs with an extra 100hp that weighs basically the SAME is going to be hitting similar times?

Really?
My GTO bone stock everything and full weight ran 13.018 @ 109 so it's just about right on par with what I'd expect.
What does your GTO have anything to do with it? And like I said, I've seen people hit high 13s low 14s all day long in them.
While mag times are usually slower, in this car they're quicker.
Prove it.
It's already been leaked that the motor trend tests were inflated to help ford create hype for this car. A guy working for motor trend posted pictures of the car (which was a 3.73 geard perf package car) that they also threw smaller wheels on and better rear tires to achieve their times. They also ran in ridiculous air. He was quickly banned from the Mustang board and thread deleted within 6 hours of posting everything.


I've seen three other magazines that ran mid 12s in these cars.

Again, you're in denial.
Old 07-07-2010, 01:23 PM
  #25  
Teching In
 
Ju1ce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What? Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords? or was it (Insert fanboism hype creating magazing here)?

Car & Driver got a 13.3 @ 108 out of their 6spd Mustang, whats up with that?
And what stock 3v's are running low 13's? Thats what the 427r runs with a ******* blower. Guys gotta stop throwing slicks on their cars, bringing them to ATCO in December and acting like thats standard issue.
Old 07-07-2010, 01:31 PM
  #26  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ju1ce
What? Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords? or was it (Insert fanboism hype creating magazing here)?
So what you are basically saying is, no matter what anyone comes up with, you are going to belittle it and ignore the facts. Understood.
Car & Driver got a 13.3 @ 108 out of their 6spd Mustang, whats up with that?
And I believe they hit a 13.3-4 in a stock 05 GTO as well. So your 13.0 times must be LIIIIESSS!!1
And what stock 3v's are running low 13's? Thats what the 427r runs with a ******* blower.
Last time I saw a stock 427 run it was in the high 12s. I've seen them get faster times. If you'd read what I posted, I said that the FASTEST time I've seen for the 3v was 13.2/3. They average 13.5. Hell the new stock V6 is hitting mid to high 13s stock.
Guys gotta stop throwing slicks on their cars, bringing them to ATCO in December and acting like thats standard issue.
Again, someone is in denial.

If you don't think stock, out of the showroom floor auto GTs are going to be in the 12s easily I don't know what to tell you.
Old 07-07-2010, 01:42 PM
  #27  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I guess the 12.7 number here is false too?

http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/16/2...w-m3-tie-game/

BTW your numbers you gave for the auto GT you claimed to have "seen" is something we have to take for granted that you are speaking the truth about. As we've all read your kill stories before...
Old 07-07-2010, 01:58 PM
  #28  
TECH Enthusiast
 
88blackgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

since when was dead hooking a good thing

sorry i'm not a fan of tire shake
Old 07-07-2010, 02:14 PM
  #29  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
chavez885's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Ke^in
I guess the 12.7 number here is false too?

http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/16/2...w-m3-tie-game/

BTW your numbers you gave for the auto GT you claimed to have "seen" is something we have to take for granted that you are speaking the truth about. As we've all read your kill stories before...
Sweet article, didn't think they'd be the same for stopping power.

Mid to high 12's is what I expect out of a 3.73 geared M6. High 12's low 13's for the auto.
Old 07-07-2010, 02:19 PM
  #30  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From what I've seen the auto is doing similar times as the manual. Both are 6spd.
Old 07-07-2010, 03:33 PM
  #31  
Teching In
 
Mr370z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm impressed with the 5.0 and it's got real potential. I just want to see some solid numbers on race tracks, specifically VIR, Nurburgring, and Laguna Seca so we can actually compare how it performs to the Camaro SS. It's obvious I drive a 370z and I'm not impressed with the numbers the Nismo 370z runs VIR at... if the 5.0 shows real potential I might be considering a trade in
Old 07-07-2010, 03:41 PM
  #32  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
NightWindDriftr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Key West, FL / Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It took the Mustang this long? I need to trade in my wife's '05 GT for the new 5.0.
Old 07-07-2010, 03:45 PM
  #33  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Ju1ce, you are pretty ignorant as far as times go for GTs. The new GT is a solid high 12/low 13, regardless of weather. Some will run a tad slower, some will run a tad faster.
Anybody that runs in average DA (1200-2000) and has the slightest clue of what they are doing will be in the 12s @ 110+mph.
Old 07-07-2010, 03:56 PM
  #34  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
02ls1ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ju1ce
Really? Show me proof of... let's say... 5 different stock auto GT's doing 12.50's.
Shop cars don't count and neither do Magazine times.
why doesn't magazine times count? explain please
Old 07-07-2010, 04:05 PM
  #35  
Teching In
 
Ju1ce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
Ju1ce, you are pretty ignorant as far as times go for GTs. The new GT is a solid high 12/low 13, regardless of weather. Some will run a tad slower, some will run a tad faster.
Anybody that runs in average DA (1200-2000) and has the slightest clue of what they are doing will be in the 12s @ 110+mph.
Show me the timeslips from Joe Schmoe in his stock GT! Until then you have nothing but hype to base your claims off.

Originally Posted by 02ls1ss
why doesn't magazine times count? explain please
Too many number games from either fanboi mags or mags with influence.
Old 07-07-2010, 04:05 PM
  #36  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 02ls1ss
why doesn't magazine times count? explain please
Because they go against his claim that the 5.0 is a low to mid 13 second car.
Old 07-07-2010, 04:21 PM
  #37  
Teching In
 
Ju1ce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ke^in
Because they go against his claim that the 5.0 is a low to mid 13 second car.
mid 13's @ 3200ft DA...
A sharp contrast from the -1500ft DA that motor trend ran their test car in.
Old 07-07-2010, 04:23 PM
  #38  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The only person that has mentioned the motor trend numbers has been you. Many times.

Again, is the 12.7 number here false too? Are they in cahoots (I love using that word) with Ford as well?

http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/16/2...w-m3-tie-game/
Old 07-07-2010, 04:23 PM
  #39  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ju1ce
Show me the timeslips from Joe Schmoe in his stock GT! Until then you have nothing but hype to base your claims off.
I am not going off hype, I am going off what I know they will run.
Old 07-07-2010, 04:30 PM
  #40  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am not sure why he is acting so defensive about it. With a stock LS2 GTO, sure the GT would beat it. But doesn't Ju1ce have a modded GTO? Those LS2 GTOs can be quick with little mods.

I'd probably buy a used LS2 GTO before I would buy a new 5.0. But that's because I'm cheap like that.


Quick Reply: Has anyone run a new 5.0??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 AM.