Dyno Guesses & Bench Racing Forum Horsepower Estimates | Racing Scenarios

2000 Camaro SS w/bolt ons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2016, 03:31 AM
  #21  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rybern
No problem. Does that make you feel better or worse about my numbers?
Well to be perfectly honest it makes me believe you're not making 360 rwhp. Case in point, my buddy's 02 WS6 trapped 108 with 325 rwhp. Full weight, full bolt ons, and automatic too. Was in similar conditions as well. This is why I never go by dyno numbers.
Old 07-11-2016, 03:17 PM
  #22  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
rybern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Albertville, AL
Posts: 481
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Need4Camaro
Before you call it a complete loss there's still quite a bit that hasn't been touched.
What kind of rear end gears are you running? Any suspension mods?

From my understanding, the exhaust upgrades you did helped top end power, but low end power suffers alittle bit, which is why the car still feels the same in normal daily driving, you wont feel it on the streets as you seldomly ever need more than 25% throttle to drive an LS1 around town. It balances out on the track though.
I think its far from a complete loss because I gained .5 second and a much better sounding car. Gears are 3.23 with some sort of Detroit locker(according to previous owner). No suspension mods but thinking about SFC just to help stiffen up the car. With a good stall and DR's, I expect to be close to mid 12's.

That makes sense about me not feeling like it pulls more. I didn't think about these mods being gear toward top end.

I appreciate your input.
Old 07-11-2016, 03:21 PM
  #23  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
rybern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Albertville, AL
Posts: 481
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HCI2000SS
Well to be perfectly honest it makes me believe you're not making 360 rwhp. Case in point, my buddy's 02 WS6 trapped 108 with 325 rwhp. Full weight, full bolt ons, and automatic too. Was in similar conditions as well. This is why I never go by dyno numbers.
Gotcha. What was the air temp and DA where your buddy ran 108 with 325rwhp?

Should I have expected to knock off more than .5 seconds with these upgrades? BTW, I appreciate your honesty.
Old 07-11-2016, 03:40 PM
  #24  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rybern
Gotcha. What was the air temp and DA where your buddy ran 108 with 325rwhp?

Should I have expected to knock off more than .5 seconds with these upgrades? BTW, I appreciate your honesty.
If I remember right the DA was around 2000 that day, and temps in the high 60's.

The ET has a lot more to do with the launch, but from stock to full bolt ons with all else equal .5 seconds seems about right.

Yeah I'm not trying to discourage you or anything, but more just trying to steer you down the right path, because that's what we are here for. I honestly wouldn't sweat it. Your car runs just fine for what it is, so I'd just go and enjoy it.
Old 07-12-2016, 12:31 PM
  #25  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
rybern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Albertville, AL
Posts: 481
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HCI2000SS
If I remember right the DA was around 2000 that day, and temps in the high 60's.

The ET has a lot more to do with the launch, but from stock to full bolt ons with all else equal .5 seconds seems about right.

Yeah I'm not trying to discourage you or anything, but more just trying to steer you down the right path, because that's what we are here for. I honestly wouldn't sweat it. Your car runs just fine for what it is, so I'd just go and enjoy it.
I'm definitely having fun with it. I have found it pretty satisfying to do a few mods and test it at the dragstrip for gains. I'm also not sure that my DA is correct when I said 2400. I googled it for the strip that I ran and got the 2400 answer, but I have since learned that DA is contingent to temp.
Old 05-07-2019, 11:42 AM
  #26  
Teching In
 
nickpags90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rybern
Here are my track slips and even a video.

1st pass
Attachment 627169

2nd pass
Attachment 627170

http://www.youtube.com/attribution_l...m-upload_owner
my car with a slp lid no tune ran a 13.5 and it’s a convertible automatic. With a constant 2.070 60 foot
Old 05-13-2019, 05:09 AM
  #27  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
rybern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Albertville, AL
Posts: 481
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nickpags90
my car with a slp lid no tune ran a 13.5 and it’s a convertible automatic. With a constant 2.070 60 foot
That's pretty good for a convert. Nice job.
Old 05-13-2019, 10:17 AM
  #28  
Teching In
 
nickpags90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rybern
That's pretty good for a convert. Nice job.
i saw your car is an automatic with the power you’re at have you had any problems with your rear end?
Old 05-13-2019, 02:49 PM
  #29  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
rybern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Albertville, AL
Posts: 481
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nickpags90
i saw your car is an automatic with the power you’re at have you had any problems with your rear end?
I added a T/A girdle to help protect it. I sold the car almost 2 years ago. Car was too nice to leave sitting out. Sold it to an guy in his 60's. I do miss the car.
Old 05-13-2019, 10:11 PM
  #30  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (21)
 
Kingc8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,558
Received 51 Likes on 42 Posts

Default

My 2000 Z28 A4 with Hooker 1 3/4 LTs, Hooker O/R Y, E Cutout, Hooker Aerochamber, LS6 intake, Ported TB, Slp Lid and FTRA made 328hp Cutout Closed, 332hp Cutout open. I can't remember the torque numbers off hand and that was untuned so your numbers seem good.

The best time I ran bolt ons was 12.84@107.7 I believe. My 60ft was better than yours as well as DA though. Back then I had a race weight of 35XX lbs.

Edit: Found my times

My best run was:

DA: -294
60ft: 1.964
1/8th ET: 8.29
1/8th MPH: 87.07
1/4 ET: 12.849
1/4 MPH: 107.77

When I ran in July with similar DA to you I show that I ran a 13.03 @ 107
Old 06-24-2019, 10:28 AM
  #31  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
LilJayV10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Evansville,IN
Posts: 9,447
Received 898 Likes on 640 Posts

Default

Not bash but I think those numbers are pretty high for a bolt on A4 car even if the TCC was locked.

I think the MPH shows that too.
Old 06-24-2019, 02:05 PM
  #32  
On The Tree
 
War Prayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 148
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LilJayV10
Not bash but I think those numbers are pretty high for a bolt on A4 car even if the TCC was locked.

I think the MPH shows that too.
Agreed. Absolutely no negativity intended but 360whp on an auto with those mods seems like a friendly dyno, and the trap speed isn't backing up the number. What brand of dyno?



Quick Reply: 2000 Camaro SS w/bolt ons



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 PM.