Any CT people get written up on the new exhaust law?
#1
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any CT people get written up on the new exhaust law?
The new stupid one that started October 1st. Basically saying any aftermarket muffler or pipe is illegal if it makes the car louder? Not just a fione either OH NO that would be too easy. Its $150 and you have to go to court since its now a misdameaner. Yes thats right, you are now a criminal if you like the way your car sounds with freeier flowing exhaust.
#3
8 second mod
iTrader: (37)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: East Side Performance! mASShole
Posts: 17,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Any CT people get written up on the new exhaust law?
So now I guess, SLP Street Leagal Performance. Loudmouth Clames 50 state leagal, How does that get grandfathered in? How does that work?
Some laws are so f-n stupid.
Some laws are so f-n stupid.
#4
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wallingford, CT
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Any CT people get written up on the new exhaust law?
Ya we got pulled over and the cop was such idiot. He told us to put exhast on the car and we told him to look under the car. He was surpresed to see two big 4 inch flowmasters. He told us we needed to quite it down or he was going to arest us next time.
#5
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Norwalk, Connecticut
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Any CT people get written up on the new exhaust law?
Hey Guy Your car is pretty loud, but it is a good loud I am glad we went with the exhaust set up on my car because it is pretty quiet but sounds good. Sorry about the bad luck, though.
Mark
Mark
#6
TECH Addict
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Plainville,MA
Posts: 2,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Any CT people get written up on the new exhaust law?
Ya we got pulled over and the cop was such idiot. He told us to put exhast on the car and we told him to look under the car. He was surpresed to see two big 4 inch flowmasters. He told us we needed to quite it down or he was going to arest us next time.
#7
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wallingford, CT
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Any CT people get written up on the new exhaust law?
Local!
A 540 CI bbc putting out 805 flywheel horse does not help the 4 inch exhaust
we rarely take it out this cop was just an idiot
A 540 CI bbc putting out 805 flywheel horse does not help the 4 inch exhaust
we rarely take it out this cop was just an idiot
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
Re: Any CT people get written up on the new exhaust law?
A misdermeanor for having a loud exhaust???
Getting arrested because the cop thinks your car is too loud???
Thats the most f'n assinine thing I've ever heard. My sympathy goes out to you CT guys, but I know NY won't be far behind on making our laws more strict. Christ I swear, the laws get worse and worse. Soon we'll be at the point where if you sneeze without covering your mouth you'll be charged with attempted murder.
Man where's the ACLU when ya need them...
Getting arrested because the cop thinks your car is too loud???
Thats the most f'n assinine thing I've ever heard. My sympathy goes out to you CT guys, but I know NY won't be far behind on making our laws more strict. Christ I swear, the laws get worse and worse. Soon we'll be at the point where if you sneeze without covering your mouth you'll be charged with attempted murder.
Man where's the ACLU when ya need them...
#10
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Brewster, NY
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Any CT people get written up on the new exhaust law?
So, how do they determine if the car is too loud ? Is it up to the officer’s discretion ?
And I wouldn't be surprised if NY follows suit with this type of BS law.
And I wouldn't be surprised if NY follows suit with this type of BS law.
#11
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Any CT people get written up on the new exhaust law?
So, how do they determine if the car is too loud ? Is it up to the officer’s discretion ?
I recieved the followin from SEMA:
Jim:
I am aware of the new law. Last session, we took great pains to alert our Connecticut contacts to this legislation (see attached). I do not believe that we received a strong response. To follow below is a letter that I wrote to the Judiciary Committee chairman (by coincidence, his name is McDonald as well) when the bill was being considered. I have also attached a copy of our model bill which can be adapted to the needs of your state. The model does not include a provision for actual testing, but can be modified (as it was in California and Maine) to mandate state-sponsored testing. I encourage you to bring this information to the attention of your state legislators. Remember, they are elected by and work for you and your car club contacts.
In some states, we have been pushing for noise limits for modified exhaust systems, applicable to an easy to administer test standard. These limits are usually indicated in decibels and allow vehicle owners to prove compliance by an objectively measured fair and predictable procedure. In California, for example, we made provision for the testing of vehicle exhaust noise to a standard adopted by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) to an established noise limit of 95-decibels (SAE J1169). A 95-decibel limit has also been enacted in Washington State and Maine and legislation is also being considered this year in New Hampshire. The alternative, currently in effect in Connecticut, is to have law enforcement authorities make a subjective interpretation of a modified vehicle's exhaust noise level as compared to the noise emitted by the vehicle's original muffler. We find this unacceptable as a method to cite for violation of the vehicle code and certainly unfair to the many law-abiding and responsible Connecticut motorists who choose to customize their vehicles and have no connection to street racing or gang related activity.
Thanks for your interest. I also encourage you to join the SEMA Action Network which will enable you to receive notice of bills like these when they are introduced. I will have our Action Network Director (Conrad Wong) contact you by e-mail with all of the necessary information. We are available to work with you to see that the law is changed in CT.
Steve McDonald
SEMA
Dear Chairman McDonald:
On behalf of the Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA), I am writing to request your opposition to House Bill 5145 when it is heard by the Judiciary Committee. H.B. 5145 would increase the fine to $150 for violation of the state's current motor vehicle exhaust noise law. Current Connecticut law prohibits "excessive, unusual or unnecessary exhaust noise" but fails to define these terms. H.B. 5145 does not supply law enforcement officers with a clear standard to enforce, allowing them to make subjective judgments on whether or not a modified exhaust system is in violation. Connecticut's vehicle enthusiasts find this unacceptable as a method to cite for violation of this law and certainly no basis for increasing the fine so dramatically.
SEMA is a trade association made up of 4,900 businesses in Connecticut and around the country that manufacture, rebuild, distribute and retail parts and accessories for motor vehicles. The products manufactured by our member companies include functional, restoration, performance and styling enhancement products for use on passenger cars, trucks and special interest vehicles. We represent a $27 billion a year industry. Our market is the many Connecticut constituents that modify their vehicles for improved performance and utility. These vehicle hobbyists unanimously oppose this bill.
All will agree that motor vehicle exhaust systems should not be used in a way that causes overly loud or objectionable noise. However, H.B. 5145 adds substantial fines to a state law that could, if applied inappropriately, prohibit exhaust systems that result in even modest and inoffensive noise increases. Modified exhaust systems are preferred by motorists less because of their distinctive sound, but rather for their benefits to performance, durability, appearance and improved vehicle fuel efficiency.
There is a solution. The best and most fair method to address noise concerns is by instituting a noise decibel limit. In some states, noise limits for modified exhaust systems are established and measured by an easy to administer, objective and predictable test standard. California, for example, provides for the testing of vehicle exhaust noise to a standard adopted by the Society of Automotive Engineers at a noise limit of 95-decibels. A 95-decibel limit has also been enacted in Washington State and similar legislation is being considered this year in Maine and New Hampshire.
Thank you for consideration of our views. I would be happy to work with you or your staff to find satisfactory alternative language that will not discriminate unfairly against the many law-abiding Connecticut motorists who choose to customize their vehicles responsibly. I can be reached by telephone at 202/783-0864 or by e-mail at stevem@sema.org
Sincerely,
Stephen B. McDonald
SEMA Director, Government Affairs
1317 F Street, NW, Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20004
202/783-0864
stevem@sema.org
#12
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Paxton, Ma.
Posts: 3,489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Any CT people get written up on the new exhaust law?
That cranks my ***. Period. There are straight piped Harleys all over the place riding around all over New England and the police never give them a second look....They are obnoxiously loud and get away with it...What the hell is going on here?
#13
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Farmingdale NJ
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd start by writing your senators and congresspersons.
Also, if your exhaust was within legal limits prior to the bill being passed, you may be able to get the vehicle grandfathered.
As far as the "50 state legal" claim on SLP's website, it's 50 state "emissions" legal. That does not account for noise. It's a broad and misleading claim by SLP.
Also, if your exhaust was within legal limits prior to the bill being passed, you may be able to get the vehicle grandfathered.
As far as the "50 state legal" claim on SLP's website, it's 50 state "emissions" legal. That does not account for noise. It's a broad and misleading claim by SLP.
#15
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Shelton Ct
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If it's to loud your to old! Oh this is gonna make the summer so much fun now. I should put the stock exhaust back on and throw an electric cutout on to really screw with them.
#16
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: RI
Posts: 5,650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this is one of the laws that really **** me off for one reason that was already mentioned about the fing harleys that wake the dead pluss. i understand loud pipes save lives and that when you cant see them you can hear them but i say if theres defective equipment yea fine but after you sink a lot of cash into an exhaust to your needs and is made alot better than the factory stuff anyway why come down on us, the old big block muscle cars used to run around open headers
ok im done
ok im done
#17
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by ChiefBrody
If it's to loud your to old! Oh this is gonna make the summer so much fun now. I should put the stock exhaust back on and throw an electric cutout on to really screw with them.
#19
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by ChiefBrody
I'm up for it. A double line lock burnout. We'll see how they like it when there fillings are rattling out of there mouth.