MS Vista
Thus why I like building PC's, you get what you need/want. You know whats in it and you know what your expandability/upgradability is. Plus the price is equivalent or better sometimes.
Software drives the industry and this is just the next step. For somebody who just needs e-mail and web browsing, you can't beat a $300 PC.
It's funny the person I'm building this for was over my house and he saw one of my computers and was like, can you build me one like that? He has a pretty basic machine, but didn't realize how fast and extravagant you can make a computer now, if your willing to spend a little more than getting an e-machine.
Having said so, the H20 is a serious machine!!
So how much better is this OS than the current one.I will say do a clean install- don't upgrade (I had to do both!)
I will say do a clean install- don't upgrade (I had to do both!)
Bob,
Im running an ATI video card and it says I ca run Vista just fine.
Desktop Specs:
AMD Athelon64 4200
2GB PC 3700 DDR Ram
OS Running on a 74GB 10,000rpm HD
Data on a 320GB 7200rpm HD
Im running an ATI video card and it says I ca run Vista just fine.
Desktop Specs:
AMD Athelon64 4200
2GB PC 3700 DDR Ram
OS Running on a 74GB 10,000rpm HD
Data on a 320GB 7200rpm HD
Pretty Cool O/S.
Pretty Cool O/S.
MacBook Pro = $2499
AppleCare 3Yr = $349
Student Discount = -10%
Never having to worry about compatibility, OS crashes, Plus being able to run OS-10.4Tiger and Windows at the same time = PRICELESS!
Never having to worry about compatibility...
That's exactly what you have to worry about with mac's, haha. Regardless if it's an x86 architecture, the OS itself is still incompatible with a ton of software that's available for windows.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Cz_2vKq5cZk
and
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Rj3UPnriIxc
I dual boot my laptop with OpenSuse 10.2, and lately I've been spending more time in it than in my XP partition. I have no plans on upgrading to Vista... instead, I'm going to force myself to get into Linux more and become more comfortable with it.
See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpdclE_Jqa8
With the rising popularity of OSX, more and more software is becoming available, so this is a dieing argument. The Parallels solution is a bit of a band-aid but I'm betting that it's only temporary.
BTW, what version(s) of Linux is XGL available in now?
Plus I work for a firm that runs MAC's so any software I need I can get.
I would not recommend Vista to anyone for at least a year and a half... remember what happened with Windows ME?
I'm personally fed up with Windows instability when running massive graphics applications such as 3D Studio Max or Maya. Plus, aesthetically, aside for Sony, windows based laptops looks hideous. MAC makes a much better looking product.
For hardware that has Vista driver's (many don't but the OS has some compatible one's built in, possibly limiting features) When I tried to install a manufacturers driver it took about 3-4X longer to install? I don't know why, I think MS must be analyzing or creating a backup point before the driver installs.
Anyways I ran into no problems and It's pretty much idiot proof. You get asked a lot "Are you sure you want to do this" and "You must be a Admin is this ok" type stuff.
Stability wise I can find no fault even when I had like 30 processes running and a deozen or so apps/windows. The OS is very clean and the eye candy is something to be desired but not required. The transparency's are nice and the "Windows"/TAB ability is really cool to play with too (scrolls through the app panes). Hovering over minimized tabs displays a mini image of the screen, which is kinda neat. The search options built in work great and fast.
I had no hardware problems and to be honest it does kinda have a mac feel. Anyways I brought it over to his house and he's been playin' around with it and likes it.
I didn't mess with it for long but it's a very easy OS to use and an improvement visually for sure. Some software CD's I had would not load (Incompatible OS message), while other windows based softwares worked fine.
In short If you got a good working version of XP, wait till you need to upgrade or reinstall for some reason. There is no driving force or benefit going to Vista as of now. If your doing a new machine or reformatting, etc, I say go for it.
Stability wise I can find no fault even when I had like 30 processes running and a deozen or so apps/windows.
People have run into major issues trying to run iTunes on Vista. Apparently Microsoft is trying to push the Zune over the iPod and disabling the ability of iTunes to work work properly. Thats really nice for the millions of people who have iPods with Windows based machines.
I would honestly wait a year or so to get Vista on my desktop. I just don't trust Microsoft with new releases. Remember Windows ME?
Solution for me was to go back to XP on the computer.
I agree with Alex, stick with known OS's like XP or prior for the time being...they seem to work well for the most part...Vista may take a while.
My Advice is do your homework and make sure you're needed applications/hardware currently work on Vista.
good read
http://www.powerdonkey.net/vista_sitemap.php
other pros ImageX and WIM Image Format, file based disk imaging based on an updated NTFS file system.
and Windows System Assessment Tool, which helps pick apart your system and subsystem to determine bottlenecks driver/app issues, and tweak performance based on what loads. Of course you can do the same in xp, but this is a nice complete method that shows you whats impacting what at what %.





