Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

victor jr or super victor ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-2009, 05:23 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
valiant65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default victor jr or super victor ?

I have a 6.0 engine project which is supposed to make 1000 fwhp with following parts:
-stock crank and block
-mahle 4.020 dish pistons 9.2 comp with 64cc heads
-eagle 6.125 h-beams
-hyd cam 23x/23x lift .610 lsa 114
-arp studs allover
-patriot 6.0 stageIII heads 64cc
-homemade turbo kit (1.75 pri 2.5 coll & crossover) for B&W S480 T6 1.32 a/r
-megasquirt II

Question is which intake is better for me, jr or super?
Old 01-01-2009, 05:41 AM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
 
deuce_454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what you need to remember is that you will be flowing the same volume of air at boost as you would be if you ran naturally aspirated... (P*V=n*R*T) but the mass of air will be proportionately larger with increased boost pressure.. so you should ideally be looking for an intake that gave you more low to mid end torque to help get the turbos mooving..

edelbrock is comming out with a cast tunnelram that should be the ticket for you... but making 1000 Hp thru an LS6 intake isnt a problem (untill it explodes from the increased pressure that is :-) )
Old 01-01-2009, 10:36 AM
  #3  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Stock LS6 might be better lol.
Old 01-01-2009, 12:13 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
valiant65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks to all, just chose slightly used victor jr for my build.
Old 01-01-2009, 10:33 PM
  #5  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
fastls1inaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: phoenix,az
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Why did you choose that intake?

I'm having the same questions on what intake to run as well.
Old 01-03-2009, 02:21 AM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
valiant65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fastls1inaz
Why did you choose that intake?

I'm having the same questions on what intake to run as well.
Couple of things made my mind:
-I will have only 367 ci so I need parts that do not kill the whole low end torq
-smaller runners give more velocity before boost
-One friendly member here made an offer to me... Thanks BlwnTA!
Old 01-04-2009, 10:52 AM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
valiant65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How big throttle body? Ported stock enough? Coldside will be 3" tubing, so 78mm would still be bigger than tubing inside.
Old 01-04-2009, 11:01 AM
  #8  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Stock TB's have been used to 1000bhp without any problems.

It does seem daft using a TB that is a lot larger than the plumbing.
Old 01-05-2009, 07:37 AM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Fireball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cecil County Raceway!!!
Posts: 8,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I went vic Jr last year and make ~1400 FWHP. Changing to Super Vic for 2009
Old 01-05-2009, 07:41 AM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (9)
 
Ryans_pewter_ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have a black powdercoated vic jr for sale, 175$ Pm me if anyone is interested.
Old 01-05-2009, 08:12 AM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
 
deuce_454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah, now you mention it... i just bought mine friday!

the 78 mm will be more than enough.. its the same deal as the intake, same volume air at higher pressure = more mass flow, but same volume flow as stock, so 78 will be fine

some builders mount the TB pointing upwards like a 4bbl (on a plate to adapt) to avout the crappy flow of an elbow.. a 3 inch mandrell bend will work much better and be way cheaper than a fabricated elbow
Old 01-05-2009, 08:22 AM
  #12  
Dumb Ass Vette Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
ls1290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

That is an interesting method for mount the TB. What is that going to be placed in?
Old 01-05-2009, 11:47 AM
  #13  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Interesting yes...but it also reduces the volume of the plenum, and could also affect air distribution.

Hopefully Edelbrock will get this new intake into the shops at a sensible price...soon.
Old 01-05-2009, 12:06 PM
  #14  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
sciff5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Thats an interesting TB setup. Might work fine, but I dont think anyone has tried it on here. I would like to see if it effect distribution of air flow.
Old 01-05-2009, 01:06 PM
  #15  
TECH Apprentice
 
deuce_454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

schwartz racing uses it on all his 720+ hp ls7´s for ultimas (he sells like 30 of them a year)

this very engine is goung in a 1971 cutlass (thats the reason its stroked to 455 cui) www.schwartzperformance.com look in projects

quote from Hp:
We're taking this restored 1971 Cutlass Supreme SX and transforming it into "Cutlass LSX 455"
With a complete Schwartz tubular chassis, rack and pinion, QA1 coil overs, Winters 9" aluminum housing with Moser 3rd member, Baer 6 piston monoblock 6s calipers clamping 14" rotors, Forgeline modular 18x9 and 19x12.5 wheels, A Schwartz stroked 455 cubic inch dry sump LS7 Z06 engine using the original Oldsmobile 455 bore and stroke. It has custom Wiseco forged pistons, Lunati camshaft to our specs and 600 hp, mated to a Viper T56 six speed. It'll be riding on Michelin Pilots, 345/30x19 and 255/35/18's

Update 11/06/08. Final Assembly in process. Upon completion look for it in Popular Hot Rodding Magazine.

the engine has been dynoed so any individual lean conditions should have been caught.. but thats speculation on my part...
http://www.schwartzperformance.com/p...x?projectid=15

Last edited by deuce_454; 01-05-2009 at 01:11 PM.
Old 01-06-2009, 05:38 PM
  #16  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

How will the TB mounted on the intake like that mess up distribution? The Edelbrock elbows have a divider in them to supposedly help distribution.
Old 01-06-2009, 06:09 PM
  #17  
TECH Apprentice
 
deuce_454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1CAMWNDR
How will the TB mounted on the intake like that mess up distribution? The Edelbrock elbows have a divider in them to supposedly help distribution.
i think what they are referring to is that at part throttle, the blade will push air towards one end of the plenum...

according to jeff schwartz there is close to no measurable difference in EGT front to back at half compared to full throttle, so its an academic issue..
Old 01-06-2009, 07:19 PM
  #18  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Then at part throttle with a carb it would do it worse since the front two barrels only are open.
I don't think there is anything to worry about here.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:22 AM.