Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Check out the difference in numbers between our Mustang Chassis Dyno and a Dynojet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2009, 02:49 PM
  #21  
LS1TECH Sponsor
 
floormatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That is a shocker...
Old 05-11-2009, 09:25 PM
  #22  
8 sec potential, 12 sec slip
iTrader: (50)
 
ChevyChad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 4,092
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Wow! 10% difference in power and torque. Very interesting observation, and great input in this thread
Old 05-11-2009, 11:34 PM
  #23  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (45)
 
Frost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 5,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Exotic Performance Plus
Yes indeed, 430-432rwhp. It sounds like you have an eddy current Dynojet, if you don't, it's really conservative. Bob
I get 425-435rwhp SAE from stock untuned C6 Z's on the unloaded Dynojet 224 that I tune on most often. It seems to be a tad on the stingy side for a Dynojet based on numbers commonly posted here. 400rwhp from an A4 on it runs mid low 11s (60' dependent of course!) at about 118-119 MPH from a full weight car. Full weight 6 speeds that make 400rwhp on it trap about 116-117 MPH.



Quick Reply: Check out the difference in numbers between our Mustang Chassis Dyno and a Dynojet



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19 AM.