cam too big for boost?
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...8&autoview=sku
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...8&autoview=sku
Mine is a 346ci, with 232/240 .598 .608 112 LSA, with a D1 on top of it! This is a road racing ride, and all I can tell you is that up top it is a beast
Pretty close to 550 rwhp with 5.5 psig. I do not think that 113 LSA is killing that much boost, if any. I would say go for it. BTW based on the specs from the cam, I would assume that you have an stroker, or big cubes? Flame suit on for all the naysayers who read something on the internet, but have never actually run a big cam in a turbo car, to tell me it won't work
Trending Topics
ps sorry to cut in on your thread
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Flame suit on for all the naysayers who read something on the internet, but have never actually run a big cam in a turbo car, to tell me it won't work

Unless of course he's got twin 76's or maybe a 101 or something going on.
Unless of course he's got twin 76's or maybe a 101 or something going on.
Keep in mind that his motor is an LT1, which due to the more restrictive cylinder heads, requires more cam than a comparable LS based mill.
Bigger cams with more overlap can work very well IF the turbine(s) are sized to not choke the motor. In a street car application, it can be beneficial to run big cam / large turbine combos, because it softens the hit down low where traction tends to be an issue, and gives a monster top end charge where you can use it. The larger cams, coupled with bigger turbos, can also make more power at lower boost, and subsequently cooler IATs, which can be beneficial on an octane limited street motor. The reduced back pressure from the big turbines, and early EVO events, also reduce the chances of lifting a head / pushing water, which is often a problem for production 4-bolt LS series blocks.
Of course, it is possible to make great power, and enjoy near stock driveability with instant boost response, from a smaller cam and turbo combos. But, there are also other viable options for those who don't mind getting a little aggressive.
Edit: and btw; twin 76's, with big ol' honkin' .96 a/r housings, are right up my alley
Last edited by RAACCR; Jun 5, 2009 at 10:44 AM.
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...8&autoview=sku
Ok, lets figure this out then.
What turbo, engine specs, engine management/fuel system, goals?
If it's stock pcm and relatively stock LT1 as your signature would suggest than I will stand by my original thought that you do not need nor would benefit from a cam of that size.
I'm no stranger to turbo LT1's, mine had a 218/218 @.050 cam and made 850rwhp, ran 9.7@149mph/3800lbs in the 1/4 and 199.4mph in a standing mile. That car could have benefit some from a larger cam but anything even past mid 230's duration would probably just be past the point of diminishing return with 2 61mm .69a/r P-trim turbos.



