Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Ok, supercharger or turbo... lets here what you like more on the LS1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-09-2009, 11:39 AM
  #21  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (116)
 
BIG_MIKE2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Skiatook, OK
Posts: 5,222
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by SKINNY69
I'm in about the same boat as you Ian. I have a turbo 6g72 eclipse GT and while it eats up about every NA V8 I've come across, it just doesn't touch boosted V8s. In my book there really isn't a comparison, turbo all the way. I keep reading about people crying over the lack of engine bay space to mount turbos but compared to my eclipse it looks like a walk in the park. The truck manifold setup is what I plan on doing once I find the right f body.
LOL, you have never tried to install a kit in a f-body though correct? Sayin it's a walk in the park is far from correct. Do some searching & read thru some install threads & the things that had to be done to make everything work if your doin it yourself & not having a shop do the install.
Old 09-09-2009, 03:08 PM
  #22  
Launching!
 
SKINNY69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Newville, PA
Posts: 205
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BIG_MIKE2005
LOL, you have never tried to install a kit in a f-body though correct? Sayin it's a walk in the park is far from correct. Do some searching & read thru some install threads & the things that had to be done to make everything work if your doin it yourself & not having a shop do the install.
Compared to my eclipse there's lots of space in an fbody... Do you think a 6g72 is a 4 cylinder or what? The picture can speak for itself.

Old 09-09-2009, 03:34 PM
  #23  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (116)
 
BIG_MIKE2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Skiatook, OK
Posts: 5,222
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by SKINNY69
Compared to my eclipse there's lots of space in an fbody... Do you think a 6g72 is a 4 cylinder or what? The picture can speak for itself.

And exactly what does this have to do with your comment about it being a walk in the park on a f-body? There isnt as much room to work as it appears once you start flipping manifolds over for a turbo kit. Like I said do more reading on it for these car, not imports before tryin to say installs are a walk in the park. It has been proven otherwise on many turbo builds.
Old 09-09-2009, 03:49 PM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (9)
 
Super Slow SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Greenville, Raleigh NC
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Its like ya'll said everyone is entitled to their own opinion and that's what the OP is wanting to hear. To my knowledge a car has never came factory with a centrifugal supercharger on it. And I can make a grocery list of cars to come with turbos and intercoolers so you cant really knock the reliability of them. And just to defend my point I did post the last part separate so he would know that was my opinion only speaking.

But you are wrong on the initial cost part, I said if he had an ability to get the fab work done it would be cheaper or for that matter people have gone single digits on e-bay $500 hot side parts and $250 e-bay intercooler and pipe kits so it wouldn't be cheaper to do a s/c, there are plenty of guys on this board that can attest to doing a custom turbo kit including all the parts for less than 4k, you cant get a S/C kit for that much.
Old 09-09-2009, 03:56 PM
  #25  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (31)
 
RS_SS69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im biased, after seeing 2 cars here have constant trouble with a d1sc breaking belts even with the right parts, then 1 went to a f1a and shredded the belt, it rubbed a hole in the be cool radiator twice and just plain and simple has fitment issues I voted against them. It took him 3 tries to figure out what the right bracket and tensioner was for the setup and sadly enough it was a Vortech design that worked. I love the vortech setups as 2 guys here have the YSI and push well into 800rwhp and have no issues whatsoever but it makes the engine bay almost impossible to access.

Yes you have to stand the radiator up in a turbo setup but there are plenty of ways around not having to relocate anything or buy a turbo k member and the day a vortech or procharger full setup is $4500 shipped new and can put the numbers down like this then I will buy one untill then I will stay turbo. When you want the blowers to put that out you almost always have to upgrade the head unit which is $2000+ ontop of the $6-8000 you already spent for the original setup!

Granted you can sell your old head unit but your still out $1000 or more. So your talking $7-10000 for a proper blower setup to be in the 800+ range efficiently without maxing out the head unit. My boss has at least $8000 in his YSI setup then about another $12000 into the car to take all the power and be able to drive it daily get 20+ mpg and not have to worry what is going to break.

So yes I will take my $4500 turbo kit and dump another $6-8000 into the rest of the car to take it.

Plain and simple is if you want to stay under 600rwhp then blower any day cant beat it. But when your getting into parts like this that are more than what you paid for the whole car itself is crazy. Plan on keeping the car you will never get what you put into it.
Old 09-10-2009, 01:06 AM
  #26  
8 sec potential, 12 sec slip
iTrader: (50)
 
ChevyChad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 4,093
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Super Slow SS
Its like ya'll said everyone is entitled to their own opinion and that's what the OP is wanting to hear. To my knowledge a car has never came factory with a centrifugal supercharger on it. And I can make a grocery list of cars to come with turbos and intercoolers so you cant really knock the reliability of them. And just to defend my point I did post the last part separate so he would know that was my opinion only speaking.

But you are wrong on the initial cost part, I said if he had an ability to get the fab work done it would be cheaper or for that matter people have gone single digits on e-bay $500 hot side parts and $250 e-bay intercooler and pipe kits so it wouldn't be cheaper to do a s/c, there are plenty of guys on this board that can attest to doing a custom turbo kit including all the parts for less than 4k, you cant get a S/C kit for that much.
$500 hot side > $100 bracket + $150 in pulleys

$250 IC & cold side piping for turbo = $250 IC & cold side piping for S/C

I'm gonna have to raise the BS flag on you on the $4k comment as well. I JUST helped a buddy do a D1SC setup and total he has right at $3k in parts. He is fully capable of doing his own welding for the pipes (I know, he did the welding on my setup). Yes, thats with a slightly used low mileage D1SC, but even if he bought new, he could have had everything for under $4k

I'm done e-arguing LOL I don't care what the OP decides to do honestly. I don't need to defend prochargers. Everyone doesnt have to like them, and everyone is entitled to their own opinions. I just hate it when their opinions are based on false data, and even worse when they try to spread that false data to others who dont know any better.. At the end of the day, any FI setup will get the job done. There is a million ways to skin this cat. boost = boost, so lets just all get along lol
Old 09-10-2009, 05:35 AM
  #27  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
alottaboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SKINNY69
Compared to my eclipse there's lots of space in an fbody... Do you think a 6g72 is a 4 cylinder or what? The picture can speak for itself.
NOTHING!! compared to my TT Stealth. Talk about a PITA to work on!
Old 09-10-2009, 06:33 AM
  #28  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (116)
 
BIG_MIKE2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Skiatook, OK
Posts: 5,222
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by ChevyChad
$500 hot side > $100 bracket + $150 in pulleys

$250 IC & cold side piping for turbo = $250 IC & cold side piping for S/C

I'm gonna have to raise the BS flag on you on the $4k comment as well. I JUST helped a buddy do a D1SC setup and total he has right at $3k in parts. He is fully capable of doing his own welding for the pipes (I know, he did the welding on my setup). Yes, thats with a slightly used low mileage D1SC, but even if he bought new, he could have had everything for under $4k

I'm done e-arguing LOL I don't care what the OP decides to do honestly. I don't need to defend prochargers. Everyone doesnt have to like them, and everyone is entitled to their own opinions. I just hate it when their opinions are based on false data, and even worse when they try to spread that false data to others who dont know any better.. At the end of the day, any FI setup will get the job done. There is a million ways to skin this cat. boost = boost, so lets just all get along lol
Agreed. And the only way I see a turbo build in that price range is running **** APS turbos, LMAO. Your definetly not buying Turbonetics & the rest of the parts for $4k.
Old 09-10-2009, 11:16 AM
  #29  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (31)
 
RS_SS69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BIG_MIKE2005
Agreed. And the only way I see a turbo build in that price range is running **** APS turbos, LMAO. Your definetly not buying Turbonetics & the rest of the parts for $4k.
APS turbos are the worst and most expensive. As for the turbonetics and the rest of the parts for $4k yes its being had.

My setup

Tubular headers
crossover pipe
downpipe
JGS 40mm wastegate
JGS 50mm blowoff valve
TC78 turbo
Frontmount with piping
Oil feed and return

$3845 plus shipping.

You cannot count guages, fuel system, ect into this as both blowers and turbos need them seperatly.

It can be had for under $4k and im doing Tubular headers in stainless to boot. That is all new parts nothing used, new procharger D1SC from lets say EPP

#ATI 1GJ204-SCI - ATI ProCharger D-1SC for 98-02 F body
This kit requires you to have custom tuning
Price: $6,019.99

Manufacturer: ProCharger (ATI)

This kit is without the injectors, and dampner pulley you would need so your still $2000 over a turbo new for the basics and the D1SC is maxed around 16psi where the tc78 has easily gone 20+psi.

Not trying to start a war here but it CAN be done. Also kit is not homebuilt.
Old 09-10-2009, 11:58 AM
  #30  
8 sec potential, 12 sec slip
iTrader: (50)
 
ChevyChad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 4,093
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Dude!, are you freakin serious!? How are you even comparing a pieced together kit you fab up yourself with a brand new from a dealer complete s/c kit? Thats not fair at all man. Compare apples vs apples. I can buy everything new for a procharger setup separately and fab it up myself just like you have done with your turbo kit. How bout we compare a procharger kit from EPP to an APS or KYTP or OFI COMPLETE setup. I'm pretty sure the turbo route is going to cost more AND be more complicated simply because there are more parts to a turbo kit.
Old 09-10-2009, 12:05 PM
  #31  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (31)
 
RS_SS69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChevyChad
Dude!, are you freakin serious!? How are you even comparing a pieced together kit you fab up yourself with a brand new from a dealer complete s/c kit? Thats not fair at all man. Compare apples vs apples. I can buy everything new for a procharger setup separately and fab it up myself just like you have done with your turbo kit. How bout we compare a procharger kit from EPP to an APS or KYTP or OFI COMPLETE setup. I'm pretty sure the turbo route is going to cost more AND be more complicated simply because there are more parts to a turbo kit.
DUDE that is a kit from KYTP, called Josh and got mine setup.

Also if you read the last thing I said in the last post, NOT A HOMEBUILT KIT.

LOL im all for both just stating if you do it right then it can be done cheaper through a company.
Old 09-10-2009, 12:23 PM
  #32  
8 sec potential, 12 sec slip
iTrader: (50)
 
ChevyChad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 4,093
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I stand corrected then. I thought that was you parting it together yourself. Props to KYTP for providing a kit like that.
Old 09-10-2009, 12:46 PM
  #33  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (31)
 
RS_SS69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChevyChad
I stand corrected then. I thought that was you parting it together yourself. Props to KYTP for providing a kit like that.
Yeah Josh is a great guy went that route since the truck manifold kit and relocating everything and the tubular k member cost the same as just keeping the stock k frame, ac and alternator in stock location and just doing tubular headers.

Oh and I made a mistake it would have been like $4500 with the cold piping which I already had but still a great price as Josh likes to work with everyone on pricing and thier personal build.
Old 09-10-2009, 01:23 PM
  #34  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
'Trust''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eternity
Posts: 7,975
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I love my supercharger, I really do, but I have an itch for a big single!
Old 09-10-2009, 02:14 PM
  #35  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

These conversations always drift off topic.

I have never had a supercharger car but I did a bunch of reading before diving into my turbo build. The belt slip issues were a major turn off. The constant whistling sound coupled with the louder NA type exhaust also didn't appeal to me. Parasitic drag requires that the fuel system have atleast an additional 10% capacity. Add to all that the lack of boost control options and I was sold on the turbo.

Then you could always do a search for guys that have switched from one to the other and they are usually going from blower to turbo. It's rare to sdee someone going the other way.

A turbo system will always be more expensive unless you are creative and a bargain hunter and either have fab skills or have friends with fab skills. I built my entire turbo setup with 1000 rwhp capability for under $5K. That includes the fuel system, hot side, cold side, IC, BOV, truck manifolds, flanges, raw materials, WG, and turbo. I didn't pay a penny for fab work but I also didn't cut corners on materials or quality of components.

As for leaving hard, I was carrying the wheels pretty good on mine with a bonestock LONG block LQ9. Ran a 6.32 @ 109.5 in the eight with a 1.38 60'. I am currently in search of a bare block to build a forged bottom end and turn it up to full blast. Hoping for high 8's.
Old 09-10-2009, 03:25 PM
  #36  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
DanZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cali/Bay Area
Posts: 3,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'll stick with my F3 .
Old 09-11-2009, 12:54 PM
  #37  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (17)
 
sr71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Knoxville,TN
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

I've had both and here is how I look at it from personal experience with everything else being equal.....

sc for manual trans car.

turbo for auto car.
Old 09-11-2009, 02:31 PM
  #38  
Launching!
 
abbaskhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i went with s/c for a low boost daily driver but if i were going ALL out 1200rwhp i would have done turbo

turbos are more money to setup properly i dont care what everyone says they are!!!! ive had 3 and done custom kits on 4 vipers so....

s/c work fine in low boost situations 5-12psi anything above that turbo is the way to go

as for production cars using superchargers the dare dz, the ssc koegnissig (wat ever i cant spell), the paxton shelbys, the cobra twin supercharged from shelby, and the g ladder series of VW's... im sure there are more but these are off the top of my head

heres one that will mess with your head

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aSR5...layer_embedded
Old 09-11-2009, 03:10 PM
  #39  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
DanZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cali/Bay Area
Posts: 3,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

s/c work fine in low boost situations 5-12psi anything above that turbo is the way to go
What makes you say that?
Old 09-11-2009, 04:32 PM
  #40  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
MelScrilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DanZ28
I'll stick with my F3 .
A F3 on a F body this is a must see. I've always wondered if you can go bigger than a F1R on a F body.

Now we need pics.


Quick Reply: Ok, supercharger or turbo... lets here what you like more on the LS1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 AM.