Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

What are the big #'s being made with truck manifolds?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-2009, 08:15 PM
  #21  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
frcefed98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 6,907
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Is it safe to say that they'll support more HP/power than the LS platform will support up to this point in the LS game?
Old 10-23-2009, 08:55 AM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Classic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

As you can see, they are good to well beyond your requirements. Mine did 1150+ in my street car.
Old 10-23-2009, 09:19 AM
  #23  
Launching!
 
Shearer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Chicago
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BlwnTA
I don't think we really know where the limit is yet. I'm making around 1850-1900bhp and Mike Brown is closer to 2000bhp or maybe more. As far as I know, we are only ones that pushed them that far and trust me, they will be pushed even harder next year .

Mark
You and Mike are making a ton of power with the cast manifolds. But that doesn't mean that you will not see gains by switching to a tubular set-up. My $.02.
Old 10-23-2009, 10:03 AM
  #24  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
chasgiv3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Generally when tubular headers are made they make them with less sharp bends and are made with equal length tubes per cylinder for better scavenging.

So yes I'd agree that you would get better numbers. How much better is really the question. Unfortunately it's not that simple. Depending on the Turbocharger design, piping and size you may be gaining almost nothing.

My cast manifolds don't seem to move, sag or need tweaking even with the heat cycling they deal with. If money was no object I'd go tubular.
Old 10-23-2009, 02:02 PM
  #25  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Some of the biggest gains with tubular headers would probably be in na power, making it faster at spooling the turbo when staging. I am on the fence on my own build, but leaning towards tubular.....

Kurt
Old 10-23-2009, 04:52 PM
  #26  
On The Tree
 
Mavmavv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Dont cast manifolds handle heat better than tubular anyways?
Old 10-23-2009, 07:09 PM
  #27  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
OUTLAWZ RACING's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: COLUMBUS GA.
Posts: 2,726
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by BlwnTA
I don't think we really know where the limit is yet. I'm making around 1850-1900bhp and Mike Brown is closer to 2000bhp or maybe more. As far as I know, we are only ones that pushed them that far and trust me, they will be pushed even harder next year .

Mark
Please send one, size 34 boxer shorts and some baby wipes I just nutted.....


Thank u sir..
Old 10-23-2009, 08:15 PM
  #28  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
BlwnTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shearer
You and Mike are making a ton of power with the cast manifolds. But that doesn't mean that you will not see gains by switching to a tubular set-up. My $.02.
Ron...I was going to leave this alone so to not hurt the header business but if you knew every detail of Mike's set-up (truck mani's) and Steve's set-up (tubular headers) you wouldn't say "big" gains. In fact, it's non existent right now and that's at 2000HP. There may be advantage at some point with certain combo's, say for a big block with twins, but it is very apparent that the bang for the buck just isn't there with our stuff.
Old 10-23-2009, 08:15 PM
  #29  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
BlwnTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 427
Some of the biggest gains with tubular headers would probably be in na power, making it faster at spooling the turbo when staging. I am on the fence on my own build, but leaning towards tubular.....

Kurt

Chicken....lol
Old 10-23-2009, 08:48 PM
  #30  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I am going tubualr on my next build partly for the idea that they "should" spool some twins better on a pro-tree....AND THE BLING FACTOR!!!!!
Old 10-23-2009, 09:27 PM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
MelScrilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

this may be the first case that a budget setup wins, usaully budget and high horsepower dont go together.
Old 10-25-2009, 10:02 PM
  #32  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (8)
 
jp92z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NE TEXAS
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

are the 6.0 manifolds stock or is there any porting done to them?
Old 10-26-2009, 04:03 PM
  #33  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
chasgiv3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

No porting done to mine and she put down 900RWHP. I thought about buying a better intake and bigger throttlebody but when it's all said and done I don't think I'll be getting much in the way of additional power. I'm spending my money on bigger injectors and a new parachute.
Old 10-26-2009, 10:22 PM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
99Z28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I love real world experience and experiments
Old 10-26-2009, 10:43 PM
  #35  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (18)
 
TurboZ28408's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

anyone measure the backpressure ?
Old 10-28-2009, 09:18 AM
  #36  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Gforce Engineering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd like to thank the "big boys" for stepping into this thread.
Lots of good information has been mentioned here.
You cant beat the look of custom tubular headers and I'm sure there are gains to be had from them.
And you also cant beat the truck manifolds for the OEM look, price and durability. Plus it sounds like they will hang right up there with the headers.

Thanks
Chris
Old 10-28-2009, 09:55 AM
  #37  
Banned
iTrader: (120)
 
Josh@KY-Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Headers, manifolds, maifolds, headers....the debate continues.

They both have thier place.
Manfolds are simple, stronger, and save fab time.
Headers have the bling factor, Cost more, More fab time, and so on.
Both have made 1500rwhp.


I do both on a daily basis. Single and twin setups. Small frame and large frame setups. Spool up characteristics from Maniofolds to headers is a mute point. Its all in what you want and are looking for with your build.

Thanks you for your time.
Old 10-28-2009, 10:03 AM
  #38  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

FWIW, I have not seen a turbo car spool faster than my old setup. 1 3/4" headers and a 2.5" crossover tube, 106mm turbo, 1.32/g-trim. We'd be ready to leave in less than 1.5 seconds(1.25-1.27 60'), stages just like a nitrous car.
Old 10-29-2009, 08:59 AM
  #39  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
99Z28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Phil99vette
FWIW, I have not seen a turbo car spool faster than my old setup. 1 3/4" headers and a 2.5" crossover tube, 106mm turbo, 1.32/g-trim. We'd be ready to leave in less than 1.5 seconds(1.25-1.27 60'), stages just like a nitrous car.

Do you think it was because placement of the turbo?
or just how your pipes were routed?
or just because your motor was built with quote, "Better parts than most?"
Or the material used
or how you have the tune set up?
Old 02-16-2012, 09:01 PM
  #40  
MASS seller approved
iTrader: (13)
 
mitchellmade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Trenton,nj
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

can i see some pics of truck manifolds on a single turbo set up?


Quick Reply: What are the big #'s being made with truck manifolds?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 AM.