Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Anyone use a Edelbrock Pro-Flo XT with boost?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2010, 06:13 PM
  #21  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Forcfed93
One thing to remember with this intake if you're using the Eddy rails as well, is that you're limited to the types of injectors it will take. You can't use the fat style injectors that most Low-z come in. I've been wanting to find something over 100lb/hr but the high-z skinny siemens versions are expensive.
Did not know that. Thanks for that good bit of info. My buddy just bought one for his turbo silverado project and was counting on using low imp injs and mega squirt.
Old 03-26-2010, 06:34 PM
  #22  
TECH Enthusiast
 
buick_lsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How much power would the 100lb/hour inj. support....and could you just use diff fuel rails (and still use the pro flo) to support low impedance inj. if you needed more?
Old 03-26-2010, 06:35 PM
  #23  
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
RX666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i was all about that intake when they first came out, now that ive realized im not into having to use a 14 inch cowl hood, ive moved on.
Old 03-27-2010, 11:23 AM
  #24  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by buick_lsx
How much power would the 100lb/hour inj. support....and could you just use diff fuel rails (and still use the pro flo) to support low impedance inj. if you needed more?
Why **** about with old low impedance when there are better performing high impedance injectors available that will fit ?
Old 03-27-2010, 12:20 PM
  #25  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Why **** about with old low impedance when there are better performing high impedance injectors available that will fit ?
They are BIG MONEY for big high imp injs. I've seen over $2K for a set of 220's & over $1K for 120's. As far as better performing, I haven't had any trouble with the low imp injs yet. Good driveability and rock solid fuel delivery down the track. What sort of issues are the high imp injs resolving?

I do agree that if you are going to have to run a driver box, may as well just spring for the high imps.
Old 03-27-2010, 12:43 PM
  #26  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Boosted One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cecil County, MD
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by grifter757
I think so just couldnt find his thread. Also wanted to know what kind of power he was making with it. Just thought the intake would be nice for the "different" look.

That was me. It made 753rwhp @14psi. So far the intake seems to be working great with my combo. Lots of under the curve power, great throttle response and higher than expected Hp.



Quick Reply: Anyone use a Edelbrock Pro-Flo XT with boost?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 AM.