?s on low impedance box
atleast on mine, it was a simple splice inline with the 8 injector wires from the PCM. A 12V supply to the box, and a ground. Then tune for the injectors.
There is a point where you can't get the pulse width small enough due to PCM limits, and you will have to run open loop at idle via the PE table. Or run open loop all the time. I use leaded fuel only, and removed the stock O2's in favor of an in car wideband. So it didn't bother me any

Anyone having good results with the bigger HighZs.
Since this dyno we reworked the torque converter (2000 stall-oops to 3900!) and pulled a 10.79 smokin the drag radials for half the track! Then we drove it home! No trailers here! We have dyno emissions tests to boot!
We are currently building the suspension with bearings instead of bushings and have fabricated aluminum disks to replace the rubber in the torque tube.
Real wrinkle walls this season!
-Geoff
Trending Topics
offsets and IFR are all you really need to mess with if you stay below a 72 or so injector.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I saw somewhere that ChrisB or LJ had posted success getting them to work with lean idle trims, what do you think about that?
the clamped pulse width is uneffected by anything the trims do, short or long. So the trims continue to learn down, until they can't go any more. So both long and shorts are full negative. As soon an you give it any throttle, and it needs more fuel than the clamped pulse width you have to drive through the full negative trims.
the are ways around it, PE at idle to turn off the trims or open loop. you can't mess w/ the IFR or the MAF curve cause the minimum clamp overrides everything it seems.
Yep, those are the only current options afaik. LJ mentioned adding the ability to have a constant negative offset to some of the new acceleronics boxes - say it was 1msec. A reported pulsewidth of 2msec would actually be 1msec, 18msec would be 17, etc. You could compensate for this by altering the maf curve, since on-time will be ~ to airflow - but as you got larger it would have a smaller effect.
On the other hand say the unit clamped at 1.5msec - this would give you the ability to run 0.5msec pulewidths.
it would take a bit of playing around to learn ho to properly compensate, but it is definitely do-able, and would *probably* fix that issue.
But much simple is to just run PE at idle.
Thanks for the info guys.
-Geoff
Thanks for the info guys.
-Geoff
OK, I see that, then do I set my PE vs RPM table to 1.0 at the same RPM's?
-Geoff
-Geoff



