Possible causes of seized PT88...?
I see where you are going with that, but it'd be more trouble than its worth....
You'd have to weld the hole shut for the air cleaner stud, find a piece of silicone hose to attach it, etc... It's 100% easier to just buy a new air filter/rubber elbow
You'd have to weld the hole shut for the air cleaner stud, find a piece of silicone hose to attach it, etc... It's 100% easier to just buy a new air filter/rubber elbow
The inlet on my turbo is a little tight to the frame. Not alot of filter options for me. I'm going to have to duct in some air from in the fender or bumper cover.
It's hard to see but the frame rail is almost right up against the filter. Just enough room to slip it on.
Oh... A low profile filter, not a carb hat....
Now I see what you were saying... I still think the point about having to have a rubber cuppler stands. How are you going to attack that?
I also think something like that would be SERIOUSLY restrictive compared to what you have now.
Now I see what you were saying... I still think the point about having to have a rubber cuppler stands. How are you going to attack that?
I also think something like that would be SERIOUSLY restrictive compared to what you have now.
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,905
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Talked to the tech at precision today and he said the turbo seized due to back pressure. He said the LS2(364ci) engine was too big for the turbo and caused excessive back pressure...the turbo has a full 4" exhaust and I run between 5-7lbs normally with one 15psi run...he said this turbo was designed for engines from 331-347ci.....................................hmmmmmmm ...any input?
Talked to the tech at precision today and he said the turbo seized due to back pressure. He said the LS2(364ci) engine was too big for the turbo and caused excessive back pressure...the turbo has a full 4" exhaust and I run between 5-7lbs normally with one 15psi run...he said this turbo was designed for engines from 331-347ci.....................................hmmmmmmm ...any input?
Talked to the tech at precision today and he said the turbo seized due to back pressure. He said the LS2(364ci) engine was too big for the turbo and caused excessive back pressure...the turbo has a full 4" exhaust and I run between 5-7lbs normally with one 15psi run...he said this turbo was designed for engines from 331-347ci.....................................hmmmmmmm ...any input?
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo That's good. Like was said before, I have heard of many people calling them and them saying that the PT88 was overkill for the 364ci. I had a friend that was building a 408 and I told him that it would be to small and to call them. They tried to sell him a 76gts and told him the 88mm was way too much. That was the opposite of what I expected to happen. I do agree that the T4 .96 a/r housing is too small for a decently equipped 364ci. I was all fired up to do the 91mm upgrade but I think that I will upgrade the hotside first.
Talked to the tech at precision today and he said the turbo seized due to back pressure. He said the LS2(364ci) engine was too big for the turbo and caused excessive back pressure...the turbo has a full 4" exhaust and I run between 5-7lbs normally with one 15psi run...he said this turbo was designed for engines from 331-347ci.....................................hmmmmmmm ...any input?
A 5% increase in your engine size over what they designed the turbo for should not cause a turbo to sieze.
That is a pretty small margin of error - especially in the hot-rod world where every setup is very different.
i called Precision Turbo just to Se what they suggested for a turbo on my heads cam 408 they told me to get the pte 88-84 i have never heard of that turbo i asked them if i could run a pt88 witch is what i have they said it will work fine but to start watching the back pressure at 25 psi witch i dont plan on going that high i asked if the turbo was for buicks they said they started making them for the buicks but have used them on Several different set ups they told me the turbo would be fine but the pte88-84 would make 50 more rwhp im going to run the pt88 and see what happens hope your new one works out for ya who ever says its to small for the 408 is a moron it depends on your cars goal
