Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Anyone useing the 3.3 Bar Delphi Map sensor ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-2010 | 10:11 PM
  #1  
Johnv's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
Default Anyone useing the 3.3 Bar Delphi Map sensor ?

Hi,

Got a 3.3 Bar map sensor(factory style), looks to be plug and play for a ls6 manifold.

Just wondering what MAP scaler values you needed to get the sensor to read 101kpa at key on.

also read of another user not being able to get it to read below 40kpa and had trouble with idle cruise tuneing, any feedback appreciated.
Old 08-15-2010 | 11:45 PM
  #2  
Mike454SS's Avatar
TECH Addict

iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 4
From: Manchester, CT
Default

Can you post more details (part number and picture) of this sensor?
Old 08-16-2010 | 11:40 PM
  #3  
Johnv's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
Default

Originally Posted by Mike454SS
Can you post more details (part number and picture) of this sensor?
part number on box is - PS10087
will get a pic up tomorrow but looks the same as factory, just a couple of extra tabs that need to be trimed off to make fit.

got it in and calibrated to read 101 kpa at key on, needed "446" in Map sensor scaler table (seems kinda high)

MAP in logs follow same cells as my 2bar sensor just giving it a bit of free revving and back to idle, but tune is now way off , has gone super lean everywhere and will need pretty big numbers even in the idle cells to bring it back into line !!!

any suggestions ?
any other map based tables need adjusting to compensate ?
Old 08-17-2010 | 12:30 AM
  #4  
NicD's Avatar
7 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,827
Likes: 344
From: Chandler, AZ
Default

If this is the sensor I am thinking of it doesn't read vacuum for ****, which is also why it's used on Diesels mostly. Your cruise/idle/decel fueling will be muddy depending on how much vacuum your motor makes. I think you would want 330 in the map sensor scalar for that sensor but I can't remember off the top of my head what the curve looks like on the OEM spec sheet.
Old 08-18-2010 | 04:42 PM
  #5  
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 5
From: WPB, FL
Default

Originally Posted by NicD
If this is the sensor I am thinking of it doesn't read vacuum for ****, which is also why it's used on Diesels mostly. Your cruise/idle/decel fueling will be muddy depending on how much vacuum your motor makes. I think you would want 330 in the map sensor scalar for that sensor but I can't remember off the top of my head what the curve looks like on the OEM spec sheet.
Which 3 bar do you prefer? We have been using this Duramax one and it seems to be working well everywhere. If there is a better plug-n-play, I would certainly like to try it out. And yes, should be in the 330-345 Kpa range on the high end.
Old 08-19-2010 | 07:30 AM
  #6  
Johnv's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
Default

I have to have the map sensor scaler (efi live) at 446 to get the sensor to read 101 kpa at key on.

seams to read fine in vaccum but tune has gone extremly lean for some reason.

will have it on the dyno tomorrow and see what i can do with it, may go back to the 2bar if it gives me greif.

only looking to run 18psi, just wanted the 3bar for a bit more tuneability/safety, at that level,
and to be able to log boost all the way to 18psi.
Old 09-19-2010 | 12:51 PM
  #7  
dhdenney's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,433
Likes: 0
From: Monticello, Kentucky
Default

I have tried the 3.3 bar MAP on my BS3 with no luck. I'm not sure if it's the sensor or another issue. I have posted a thread on this so not to hijack.
Old 09-20-2010 | 02:06 AM
  #8  
Johnv's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
Default

I had no luck with it either,
ended up ditching it and going back to 2 bar sensor.
Old 09-20-2010 | 05:14 AM
  #9  
dhdenney's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,433
Likes: 0
From: Monticello, Kentucky
Default

I'm going nuts with my deal as it seems the old style isn't really working either.
Old 09-20-2010 | 07:54 AM
  #10  
Julio's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: St. Petersburg, Florida
Default

Why not run the 12223861 3 bar GM sensor?

Is it becuase you want a sensor that plugs into the intake? The regular 3 bar you mount on the firewall and nobody has an issue with. Its used on pretty much every aftermarket ecm.

Just asking..
Old 09-20-2010 | 06:17 PM
  #11  
dhdenney's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,433
Likes: 0
From: Monticello, Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by Julio
Why not run the 12223861 3 bar GM sensor?

Is it becuase you want a sensor that plugs into the intake? The regular 3 bar you mount on the firewall and nobody has an issue with. Its used on pretty much every aftermarket ecm.

Just asking..
I have that sensor now and it still doesn't work. I'm not sure if my BS3 is f'ed now because I used that other sensor or what. Just not sure at this point. I originally chose the 3.3 bar sensor because the pigtails matched. I guess I assumed because it was a 3.3 bar and plugged right up that it would be fine. I suppose I just hated hacking up my BS3 harness. As far as sticking in the intake, that didn't matter as I have a Victor Jr.
Old 09-20-2010 | 06:52 PM
  #12  
TracyRR's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 699
Likes: 3
From: Louisiana
Default

I'm not a tuner (not at all, ha ha) but i did watch my tuner geoff when he dialed it in.... he used 289 and then the box below it (efi live) he used 47 to get it to 100kpa and to get the left/right fuel trims to zero as compared to my 2 bar tune. My VE was at 56 at idle. I do not know the correct terms in tuning so excuse my description. It runs great as this is my daily driver. One thing i do notice is the AFR hunts around a little while cruising but it runs just fine. I hope this helps someone. Best of luck.
Old 09-21-2010 | 07:48 AM
  #13  
Julio's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: St. Petersburg, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by dhdenney
I have that sensor now and it still doesn't work. I'm not sure if my BS3 is f'ed now because I used that other sensor or what. Just not sure at this point. I originally chose the 3.3 bar sensor because the pigtails matched. I guess I assumed because it was a 3.3 bar and plugged right up that it would be fine. I suppose I just hated hacking up my BS3 harness. As far as sticking in the intake, that didn't matter as I have a Victor Jr.
Basically you try and match a sensor to your intended goals as far as boost.

If you run 13 PSI boost, a 2 bar is better suited. Just like if you shift at 7000 then an 8k tach is fine. But if you get a 20K tach... then its hard to see the needle at 7000. In other words, putting a 3 bar sensor will not make you faster unless your running more than 16 PSI and less than 32 PSI.

Maybe your plugs are wired backwards?
If this helps.
Terminal A is ground.
Terminal B is signal
Terminal C is +5 vdc

Key ON.. 5 volts applied, sea level.. terminal B will read 1.6 volts on a 3 bar. 2bar will read 2.3 volts.
Old 09-21-2010 | 10:41 AM
  #14  
darkhorizon's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Default

I run a maf setup, use the stock map for the map input on the pcm and send this map sensor voltage to the AC pressure sensor or EGR pintle position to scan it.
Old 09-21-2010 | 12:25 PM
  #15  
Snyper's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,905
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by Johnv
I have to have the map sensor scaler (efi live) at 446 to get the sensor to read 101 kpa at key on.

seams to read fine in vaccum but tune has gone extremly lean for some reason.

will have it on the dyno tomorrow and see what i can do with it, may go back to the 2bar if it gives me greif.

only looking to run 18psi, just wanted the 3bar for a bit more tuneability/safety, at that level,
and to be able to log boost all the way to 18psi.

I run a custom 2.5bar map sensor that uses a stock, modified 1bar sensor. Running a 3bar sensor will gain no safety and actually lose tuneability over going with a 2..or 2.5 bar. My sensor goes all the way up to 255kpa or 22.9psi.

http://www.dpecorvettes.com/gpage4.html is where I got it from and have been running it for the past 6 months with no problems.
Old 09-21-2010 | 01:25 PM
  #16  
dhdenney's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,433
Likes: 0
From: Monticello, Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by Julio
Basically you try and match a sensor to your intended goals as far as boost.

If you run 13 PSI boost, a 2 bar is better suited. Just like if you shift at 7000 then an 8k tach is fine. But if you get a 20K tach... then its hard to see the needle at 7000. In other words, putting a 3 bar sensor will not make you faster unless your running more than 16 PSI and less than 32 PSI.

Maybe your plugs are wired backwards?
If this helps.
Terminal A is ground.
Terminal B is signal
Terminal C is +5 vdc

Key ON.. 5 volts applied, sea level.. terminal B will read 1.6 volts on a 3 bar. 2bar will read 2.3 volts.
You're reading too far into that post. I was just making the point that the 3.3 bar didn't work.
Old 09-21-2010 | 01:48 PM
  #17  
Julio's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: St. Petersburg, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by dhdenney
You're reading too far into that post. I was just making the point that the 3.3 bar didn't work.
Did you get the 3 bar working?
Old 09-21-2010 | 01:51 PM
  #18  
Julio's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: St. Petersburg, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Snyper
I run a custom 2.5bar map sensor that uses a stock, modified 1bar sensor. Running a 3bar sensor will gain no safety and actually lose tuneability over going with a 2..or 2.5 bar. My sensor goes all the way up to 255kpa or 22.9psi.

http://www.dpecorvettes.com/gpage4.html is where I got it from and have been running it for the past 6 months with no problems.
You should run a MAP sensor that matches your intended boost range. For someone running 10 PSI boost.. a 2 bar is better suited.

Someone running 20-23 PSI.. a 2.5 bar.

Someone running 28 PSI.. a 3 bar.
Old 09-21-2010 | 02:52 PM
  #19  
Snyper's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,905
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by Julio
You should run a MAP sensor that matches your intended boost range. For someone running 10 PSI boost.. a 2 bar is better suited.

Someone running 20-23 PSI.. a 2.5 bar.

Someone running 28 PSI.. a 3 bar.
I run 6-15psi for now and this one works absolutely great.
Old 09-21-2010 | 04:09 PM
  #20  
Julio's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: St. Petersburg, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Snyper
I run 6-15psi for now and this one works absolutely great.
Technically a 2 bar would have been a better choice for that boost range. But I understand, and it is what it is . And you saved money using the Motorola sensor.


Quick Reply: Anyone useing the 3.3 Bar Delphi Map sensor ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 PM.