Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Low rwhp on twin turbo setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-30-2010, 08:18 PM
  #21  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
TracyRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by black98ws6ta
I bet it is falling off up top due to backpressure.
i plan on checking this real soon... several people have said the same thing. thanks t
Old 08-30-2010, 08:21 PM
  #22  
On The Tree
 
TT350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Cam is to small.
Old 08-30-2010, 08:25 PM
  #23  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
TracyRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Slowhawk
Up the boost a few lbs. I bet the power will jump nicely.
hey slowhawk, i actually bought the camshaft from you.... it is perfect for me as a daily driver. Hopefully with more boost, it will hit my goal of 800rwhp. I am assuming with more boost that it will bring my peak hp higher in the rpm range? How much boost can i go without pushing water? i have an o-ringed iron block with copper gaskets and of course forged pistons/rods. Sorry is these are elementary questions but i am new to boost. thanks t
Old 08-31-2010, 01:54 AM
  #24  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
93camaro_zzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Diego, Ca.
Posts: 2,211
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MY99TAWS6
Boost leaks?
GT35s should be able to do like 1400 engine hp .
This ^
Old 08-31-2010, 08:02 AM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
71 chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas, Tejas
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by tt350
cam is to small.
x2. .
Old 08-31-2010, 10:21 AM
  #26  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
TracyRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TT350
Cam is to small.
I still hope to reach my 800rwhp goal with more boost and the small cam. I agree the cam is small but hope my turbo's can get me there. Thanks
Old 08-31-2010, 10:57 AM
  #27  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
mike13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lake Tapps, WA
Posts: 2,229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you have too much back pressure the dyno graph will look like it's going to make big and start to flatten out and fall off. My opinion is the cam is small but with forced induction you should still see better numbers. A good comparison is look at the horsepower numbers of people running Z06 cams.

Something else to look into is flame out of the plugs, I've seen it show up and look like valve float or a slipping trans. My motor sounded flat, I had to gap my plugs at .022

Remember boost is just a measure of restriction, so when you talk boost numbers it won't be a direct comparision, a free breathing motor with huge turbo, large ported heads and intake might only see 14-18lbs before pushing water, while a different combination might see 20+ before a hint of any problems.
Old 08-31-2010, 11:13 AM
  #28  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
TracyRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mike13
If you have too much back pressure the dyno graph will look like it's going to make big and start to flatten out and fall off. My opinion is the cam is small but with forced induction you should still see better numbers. A good comparison is look at the horsepower numbers of people running Z06 cams.

Something else to look into is flame out of the plugs, I've seen it show up and look like valve float or a slipping trans. My motor sounded flat, I had to gap my plugs at .022

Remember boost is just a measure of restriction, so when you talk boost numbers it won't be a direct comparision, a free breathing motor with huge turbo, large ported heads and intake might only see 14-18lbs before pushing water, while a different combination might see 20+ before a hint of any problems.
hey mike, i will look for some z06 cam dyno sheets and compare. I gapped my plugs to .025 so i should be good there i would think. I will install my new meth pump and up the boost. Thanks!
Old 08-31-2010, 12:43 PM
  #29  
On The Tree
 
TT350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The power is there, 610@12 psi ant bad. the cam is not big enough to carry the power
up stairs.

The cam needs to be in the high 230's @ .050 to make good power @ 6500.
The 63a/r is not happy @ 6500 on a motor that big.

.82 or the 1.06 a/r will get it done.

I bet you have more torque than HP.

What you have is a car that is a blast to drive.
The bigger a/r's and cam will take the fun out of it.
Old 08-31-2010, 01:06 PM
  #30  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
TracyRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TT350
The power is there, 610@12 psi ant bad. the cam is not big enough to carry the power
up stairs.

The cam needs to be in the high 230's @ .050 to make good power @ 6500.
The 63a/r is not happy @ 6500 on a motor that big.

.82 or the 1.06 a/r will get it done.

I bet you have more torque than HP.

What you have is a car that is a blast to drive.
The bigger a/r's and cam will take the fun out of it.
your right! I think i saw torque at around 765 or so. I am going to check my backpressure with the .63's and will make a jump to the .82's if it is excessive. If i were to buy another cam, i would want a little lope at idle.... i have zero lope right now..... sounds stock. It is fun to drive but i want to get at least close to my goal of 800rwhp. Thanks for the help! t
Old 08-31-2010, 03:24 PM
  #31  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TT350
Cam is to small.
That Cam made 900/900rw in another turbo setup of mine.Was pretty flat from 4000rpm to 6200rpm.
Old 08-31-2010, 03:27 PM
  #32  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TracyRR
hey slowhawk, i actually bought the camshaft from you.... it is perfect for me as a daily driver. Hopefully with more boost, it will hit my goal of 800rwhp. I am assuming with more boost that it will bring my peak hp higher in the rpm range? How much boost can i go without pushing water? i have an o-ringed iron block with copper gaskets and of course forged pistons/rods. Sorry is these are elementary questions but i am new to boost. thanks t
16lbs should be just right.You could probly run that boost on just pump gas but it's a good idea to add meth for safety.
Old 08-31-2010, 03:58 PM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
71 chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas, Tejas
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Slowhawk
That Cam made 900/900rw in another turbo setup of mine.Was pretty flat from 4000rpm to 6200rpm.
not at 12psi boost it didnt
Old 08-31-2010, 05:06 PM
  #34  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
TracyRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Slowhawk
16lbs should be just right.You could probly run that boost on just pump gas but it's a good idea to add meth for safety.
Thanks for the info!
Old 08-31-2010, 05:08 PM
  #35  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
99Ls1fever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Eaton, Colorado
Posts: 1,821
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

STS=Junk!!!
Old 08-31-2010, 11:18 PM
  #36  
FormerVendor
 
qqwqeqwrqwqtq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WWW.SPEEDINC.COM
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Unless for some reason rear mount setups need a lot more cam than a traditional turbo setup I don't see a problem with the cam at all.

Needing high 230's to make power to 6500? We've run many combos with a 232 cam making 1150+rwhp and turning 7800rpm.

Check backpressure at turbine housing (I'll guess it will be quite high). Measure boost at compressor cover(I'll guess it's substantially more than you see at the intake manifold).

Post a dyno graph.

I may have missed it but what are the valvesprings installed height or seat pressure? The more backpressure you have the more seat pressure you need on the exhaust valve for it to run clean up top.
Old 09-01-2010, 01:31 AM
  #37  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
71 chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas, Tejas
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by INTMD8
Needing high 230's to make power to 6500? We've run many combos with a 232 cam making 1150+rwhp and turning 7800rpm.
im curious what CID, where this 232 cam peaked, and how many psi boost.
Old 09-01-2010, 08:31 AM
  #38  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
TracyRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by INTMD8
Check backpressure at turbine housing (I'll guess it will be quite high). Measure boost at compressor cover(I'll guess it's substantially more than you see at the intake manifold).

Post a dyno graph.

I may have missed it but what are the valvesprings installed height or seat pressure? The more backpressure you have the more seat pressure you need on the exhaust valve for it to run clean up top.
hey intmd8, yes, i will check backpressure this weekend. What does it mean if i have more boost at the compressor vs. the intake? Piping or i/c restriction? Patriot just freshened the heads so i don't know what installed height or seat pressure is, but i can check it to make sure. I'm scheduling another dyno date and install a 3 bar map in the next couple of weeks to see what high boost will do. I don't have the dyno sheets yet, my tuners printer crapped out. I'll see if he can email me the runs. Thanks for the info!
Old 09-01-2010, 09:40 AM
  #39  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
hawk584's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: earth
Posts: 1,758
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

.63 A/R sounds to small and are you running headers? stock manifolds w/full heat wrap from from to back
Old 09-01-2010, 10:08 AM
  #40  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
TracyRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by hawk584
.63 A/R sounds to small and are you running headers? stock manifolds w/full heat wrap from from to back
hawk, no headers, stock manifolds (wrapped also) with full heat wrap all the way to the turbo. It gets into boost by 3500 with a tight converter. I'm pretty happy with the spool, it hooks up well on the street. Thanks


Quick Reply: Low rwhp on twin turbo setup



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:29 AM.