Should I upgrade the cam? Specs inside
Int - 280*, 234* @ .50", .564" lift
Ex - 290*, 240* @ .50", .581" lift
LSA - 113
The machine shop is recommending this type of cam:
Int - 238* @ .50", .595" lift
Ex - 248* @ .50", .585" lift
LSA - 115
Now in my early hotrodding days, I've mismatched cams (bigger is always better, right???) and learned the hard way that everything needs to function as a system. However, since the engine has already been built for a procharger (by a shop supposedly) I figured worst case scenario is that I may lose a few hp without going with the recommended cam, but it shouldn't act like a mismatched cam.
This will be going into a Datsun 240z, so it's not really that big of a deal if I don't squeeze every ounce of horsepower out of this engine. I'm already going to be having enough traction issues as is.
So my question to you guys is how would the driving characteristics differ between the two cams? Would it be worth the extra $400+, or would the extra money be better spent elsewhere? (like a callies crankshaft, because right now it's just a stocker) The shop is waiting on me to figure out the cam situation, so I'd appreciate any help with this. Thanks
Last edited by zeeboost; Dec 5, 2010 at 08:27 AM.

But inspector is right, Get a little more up top for sure with the new cam and it may not end up being a $400 swap as you can always sell the old cam for a couple hundred and get at least half your money back and now that power is only costing you +/-$200. If you can do that, I'd say go for it OR if you want TRUE expert advice, hit up Patrick G or Predator Z for the best Cam info on these things. Good luck with the build.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Int - 280*, 234* @ .50", .564" lift
Ex - 290*, 240* @ .50", .581" lift
LSA - 113
The machine shop is recommending this type of cam:
Int - 238* @ .50", .595" lift
Ex - 248* @ .50", .585" lift
LSA - 115
Now in my early hotrodding days, I've mismatched cams (bigger is always better, right???) and learned the hard way that everything needs to function as a system. However, since the engine has already been built for a procharger (by a shop supposedly) I figured worst case scenario is that I may lose a few hp without going with the recommended cam, but it shouldn't act like a mismatched cam.
This will be going into a Datsun 240z, so it's not really that big of a deal if I don't squeeze every ounce of horsepower out of this engine. I'm already going to be having enough traction issues as is.
So my question to you guys is how would the driving characteristics differ between the two cams? Would it be worth the extra $400+, or would the extra money be better spent elsewhere? (like a callies crankshaft, because right now it's just a stocker) The shop is waiting on me to figure out the cam situation, so I'd appreciate any help with this. Thanks
Last edited by grpaic; Dec 11, 2010 at 06:28 AM. Reason: spelling
When you were talking about a kick in the pants, are you suggesting that it will be lacking in more low end power, but then hit harder once I get in the powerband? If so, that seems like more of the cam I'm looking for. I'd like to shift my powerband to around the 2500-6500k range...wheel spin will already be a PITA with this car.
I appreciate the replies so far, but I'm hoping to get more insight on this. Thanks
I'm a little confused, you suggest that it wouldn't be much of a change for the $$$ (which looking at the numbers I can see that, but that may not accurately represent the real driving conditions), but then the rest seems like you're favoring the notion that I upgrade the cam.
When you were talking about a kick in the pants, are you suggesting that it will be lacking in more low end power, but then hit harder once I get in the powerband? If so, that seems like more of the cam I'm looking for. I'd like to shift my powerband to around the 2500-6500k range...wheel spin will already be a PITA with this car.
I appreciate the replies so far, but I'm hoping to get more insight on this. Thanks
Last edited by grpaic; Dec 12, 2010 at 04:44 PM. Reason: spelling



