VE vs Psi
Higher VE by more cam duration
or
Higher Psi of boost by less cam duration
TIA
On the flip side, if the intake valve is remains open for a shorter duration, then less air can flow into the cylinder. And if the intake valve has a short duration, then obviously more psi of boost can build up in intake manifold.
I guess my question is; Is it better to have more air enter the cylinder because of the extra duration or to be pushed in by the extra pressure build up in the intake manifold?
It is a fundamental law of engine physics: A specific build will ALWAYS flow the same VOLUME of air.
With that being said, a supercharger, turbo, is never going to change the VE of the engine. The only thing that forced induction does is change the DENSITY of the air that is being ingested by the motor. The motor is still ingesting the same VOLUME of air.
Which is more important, VE or PSI? Its a tossup. PSI, once you have the system is 10x easier to increase, while most changes to your motor will only produce marginal changes in VE.
Good Luck
Trending Topics
small cam = 775 with 16psi
big cam probably would = 775 on 15 or 14
figure yea it adds little more heat but obviously at my power level still in a safe range
.. and it sounds stock
some dont go for the rumpity rump barely idling non emmissions passing ticket encouraging thing... some do.i really dont think cams make a hill of beans.. octane permitting.. not on our engines.. not yet..
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
just something to ponder.
So what breaks when these motors are pushed? Ignoring detonation which is another problem in itself. I don't know, I don't own an LS1 motor yet.
Forced induction on a stock block it is usually a ringland or the #7 piston that is the first to go. Both of these failures can usually be attributed to a poor forced induction tune/method of operation.






