Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Boosted GMPP LSX 454 Cylinder Cracks Like An Egg Shell

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-03-2011, 05:09 AM
  #201  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Boosted One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cecil County, MD
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by O.N.
lol you might want to read the first post with the pictures from the guy who posted the pics.
The left 2 are 4.185 the right 2 are 4.125
lol, thanks. I must have glanced over that.
Old 03-03-2011, 05:11 AM
  #202  
TECH Apprentice
 
O.N.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 98Z28CobraKiller
Regardless of the bore or application, the difference between the wall thickness at 10:00 and 2:00 on #6 cylinder should fail QC.
agreed in this photo yeah i'll take some pics of my engine and post them up, they look to be the same thickness all the way around the cylinder.
Did i get lucky and got a good block i dont know but mine looks fine nothing like the photo, although mine isn;t cutaway like the photo perhaps it might thin out i dont know. but from above at 4.185bore lsx454 crate motor it looks ok.
Old 03-03-2011, 06:49 PM
  #203  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
NA$TY-TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 10,333
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

wow............
Old 03-16-2011, 09:31 AM
  #204  
TECH Apprentice
 
O.N.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ok had a look inside the water jackets on my LSX454 today and it is the same as the picture from the PRI show someone else posted.

Basically the first 10mm are of a normal thickness and then you can see it humps in and is thinner the whole way down the bore.

It's thin i dont know why they would do that but it is and for N/A it will be fine.
Old 03-16-2011, 07:46 PM
  #205  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
kmracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

you cant judge cyl wall thickness by looking at it, you need a sonic tester.
Old 03-16-2011, 09:54 PM
  #206  
TECH Apprentice
 
O.N.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by kmracer
you cant judge cyl wall thickness by looking at it, you need a sonic tester.
yeah but all im saying is you can physicaly see it with your eye it is 1 thickness for about 10mm then its humps inward in a space of about 5mm and stays that thickness the wholeway down, you can clearly see it hump with your eyes.

It is clearly like this by eye and 100% gets smaller in thickness.
Old 03-16-2011, 10:17 PM
  #207  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
kmracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

have you ever run this engine?
Old 03-17-2011, 02:28 AM
  #208  
TECH Apprentice
 
O.N.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by kmracer
have you ever run this engine?
are you talking to me?
if so yeah its my second lsx454 build at the moment both are N/A applications.
Old 04-27-2011, 08:18 AM
  #209  
Teching In
 
prostreetbuyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My engine block was dimensionally defective having less than the advertised metal thickness. An important component of the engine block’s strength comes from having enough metal thickness to support a load.
The industry standard and Chevrolet’s standard for cylinder wall thickness is a minimum of .200 thousands of an inch. Summit Racing and Chevrolet’s own advertising for the lsx block states “maximum 4.250 bore at .200 minimum wall thickness”. My defective block had a intentional smaller 4.185 bore, hence the remaining cylinder wall thickness should have been .2325. However the sonic testing that was performed post-mortem discovered a bore thickness as little as .177 which effectively cheated me of .0555 thickness of metal or using a simple analogy in dollars, I was entitled to $232.50 but only received $177.00 dollars. A shortage of $55.50 or 24 percent!
Old 04-27-2011, 08:38 AM
  #210  
8 sec potential, 12 sec slip
iTrader: (50)
 
ChevyChad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 4,092
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Dude, you wont give up the fact that that max bore is for N/A applications. And the max bore is 4.200, not 4.25.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/14476280-post168.html
Old 04-27-2011, 09:43 AM
  #211  
TECH Apprentice
 
O.N.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by prostreetbuyer
My engine block was dimensionally defective having less than the advertised metal thickness. An important component of the engine block’s strength comes from having enough metal thickness to support a load.
The industry standard and Chevrolet’s standard for cylinder wall thickness is a minimum of .200 thousands of an inch. Summit Racing and Chevrolet’s own advertising for the lsx block states “maximum 4.250 bore at .200 minimum wall thickness”. My defective block had a intentional smaller 4.185 bore, hence the remaining cylinder wall thickness should have been .2325. However the sonic testing that was performed post-mortem discovered a bore thickness as little as .177 which effectively cheated me of .0555 thickness of metal or using a simple analogy in dollars, I was entitled to $232.50 but only received $177.00 dollars. A shortage of $55.50 or 24 percent!
lol ok so you had the dead engine block sonic tested then what did gmpp say about it?
Old 04-27-2011, 10:31 AM
  #212  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Boosted One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cecil County, MD
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Trust but verify. It could be interpreted that GM is saying you can have a 4.250 bore as long as you have .200" wall thickness. So if you check the thickness first you can see if you can even get to that bore to begin with. A simple sonic test on engine assembly could have saved allot of agrivation and $$$ I have to admit I'm a little slack in that area myself. I tend to trust manufactures info more than I should.
Old 04-27-2011, 11:08 AM
  #213  
Teching In
 
trenaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: DFW 888rwhp Land
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This thread has me shaking my head.. GM offers a N\A engine, the LSX454 and a boosted engine, LSX376.. Anyone thinking they can drop a bunch of boost on a the LSX454 should have done some research. There is a REASON GM says to boost the LSX376.. because that is what it is designed to do!! I have the LSX376 pushing 888rwhp out of it. Works GREAT, cost half as much as the LSX454.. Even on the corvette forum, I just laugh when people blow there LS7, which cannot handle more than 5-6psi.. They cry when they drop 9-10psi on it.. I bet the LSX454 may be able to handle 5-6psi max only with a spot on tune..

Believe it or not but GM engineers are smarter than you. This is why they have a boost friendly application available.. the LSX376.. and it delivers!
Old 04-27-2011, 11:31 AM
  #214  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (12)
 
Ravenous T\A's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Burleson/Ftw,Texas
Posts: 3,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by trenaman
This thread has me shaking my head.. GM offers a N\A engine, the LSX454 and a boosted engine, LSX376.. Anyone thinking they can drop a bunch of boost on a the LSX454 should have done some research. There is a REASON GM says to boost the LSX376.. because that is what it is designed to do!! I have the LSX376 pushing 888rwhp out of it. Works GREAT, cost half as much as the LSX454.. Even on the corvette forum, I just laugh when people blow there LS7, which cannot handle more than 5-6psi.. They cry when they drop 9-10psi on it.. I bet the LSX454 may be able to handle 5-6psi max only with a spot on tune..

Believe it or not but GM engineers are smarter than you. This is why they have a boost friendly application available.. the LSX376.. and it delivers!

he has a good point, why would someone try and boost a high compression motor not designed for boost? Whatever happens is your own damn fault
Old 04-27-2011, 04:10 PM
  #215  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Boosted One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cecil County, MD
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Wow, very impresive numbers Trenaman! Is that a 376 off the shelf, or did you change the heads/cam? Stock rod bolts?
Old 10-07-2011, 10:49 PM
  #216  
10 Second Club
 
littlefranks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: pembroke pines florida
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i just took apart our 454 lsx block first gen cylinder #6 has a hairline crack.coolant leaked into cylinder detonated head gasket between 6 and 8.na motor made 685 rwhp.what do u do can the block be fixed?
Old 10-07-2011, 11:34 PM
  #217  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Sounds like no matter N/A or boosted these motors had problems.
Old 10-08-2011, 12:40 AM
  #218  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by littlefranks
i just took apart our 454 lsx block first gen cylinder #6 has a hairline crack.coolant leaked into cylinder detonated head gasket between 6 and 8.na motor made 685 rwhp.what do u do can the block be fixed?
Not sure if you can sleeve an iron block but by the time you pay for the sleeves and the machine work, you'll likely be close to the retail price of a new block.
Old 10-08-2011, 01:43 AM
  #219  
TECH Apprentice
 
O.N.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 98Z28CobraKiller
Not sure if you can sleeve an iron block but by the time you pay for the sleeves and the machine work, you'll likely be close to the retail price of a new block.
you can sleeve it and no its doesn't cost all that much.
Old 10-08-2011, 10:13 AM
  #220  
10 Second Club
 
littlefranks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: pembroke pines florida
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

https://ls1tech.com/forums/picture.p...ictureid=77981


Quick Reply: Boosted GMPP LSX 454 Cylinder Cracks Like An Egg Shell



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 AM.