Boosted GMPP LSX 454 Cylinder Cracks Like An Egg Shell
#202
TECH Apprentice
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Did i get lucky and got a good block i dont know but mine looks fine nothing like the photo, although mine isn;t cutaway like the photo perhaps it might thin out i dont know. but from above at 4.185bore lsx454 crate motor it looks ok.
#204
TECH Apprentice
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ok had a look inside the water jackets on my LSX454 today and it is the same as the picture from the PRI show someone else posted.
Basically the first 10mm are of a normal thickness and then you can see it humps in and is thinner the whole way down the bore.
It's thin i dont know why they would do that but it is and for N/A it will be fine.
Basically the first 10mm are of a normal thickness and then you can see it humps in and is thinner the whole way down the bore.
It's thin i dont know why they would do that but it is and for N/A it will be fine.
#206
TECH Apprentice
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It is clearly like this by eye and 100% gets smaller in thickness.
#208
TECH Apprentice
#209
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My engine block was dimensionally defective having less than the advertised metal thickness. An important component of the engine block’s strength comes from having enough metal thickness to support a load.
The industry standard and Chevrolet’s standard for cylinder wall thickness is a minimum of .200 thousands of an inch. Summit Racing and Chevrolet’s own advertising for the lsx block states “maximum 4.250 bore at .200 minimum wall thickness”. My defective block had a intentional smaller 4.185 bore, hence the remaining cylinder wall thickness should have been .2325. However the sonic testing that was performed post-mortem discovered a bore thickness as little as .177 which effectively cheated me of .0555 thickness of metal or using a simple analogy in dollars, I was entitled to $232.50 but only received $177.00 dollars. A shortage of $55.50 or 24 percent!
The industry standard and Chevrolet’s standard for cylinder wall thickness is a minimum of .200 thousands of an inch. Summit Racing and Chevrolet’s own advertising for the lsx block states “maximum 4.250 bore at .200 minimum wall thickness”. My defective block had a intentional smaller 4.185 bore, hence the remaining cylinder wall thickness should have been .2325. However the sonic testing that was performed post-mortem discovered a bore thickness as little as .177 which effectively cheated me of .0555 thickness of metal or using a simple analogy in dollars, I was entitled to $232.50 but only received $177.00 dollars. A shortage of $55.50 or 24 percent!
#210
8 sec potential, 12 sec slip
iTrader: (50)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Dude, you wont give up the fact that that max bore is for N/A applications. And the max bore is 4.200, not 4.25.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/14476280-post168.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/14476280-post168.html
#211
TECH Apprentice
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My engine block was dimensionally defective having less than the advertised metal thickness. An important component of the engine block’s strength comes from having enough metal thickness to support a load.
The industry standard and Chevrolet’s standard for cylinder wall thickness is a minimum of .200 thousands of an inch. Summit Racing and Chevrolet’s own advertising for the lsx block states “maximum 4.250 bore at .200 minimum wall thickness”. My defective block had a intentional smaller 4.185 bore, hence the remaining cylinder wall thickness should have been .2325. However the sonic testing that was performed post-mortem discovered a bore thickness as little as .177 which effectively cheated me of .0555 thickness of metal or using a simple analogy in dollars, I was entitled to $232.50 but only received $177.00 dollars. A shortage of $55.50 or 24 percent!
The industry standard and Chevrolet’s standard for cylinder wall thickness is a minimum of .200 thousands of an inch. Summit Racing and Chevrolet’s own advertising for the lsx block states “maximum 4.250 bore at .200 minimum wall thickness”. My defective block had a intentional smaller 4.185 bore, hence the remaining cylinder wall thickness should have been .2325. However the sonic testing that was performed post-mortem discovered a bore thickness as little as .177 which effectively cheated me of .0555 thickness of metal or using a simple analogy in dollars, I was entitled to $232.50 but only received $177.00 dollars. A shortage of $55.50 or 24 percent!
#212
9 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cecil County, MD
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech20year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Trust but verify. It could be interpreted that GM is saying you can have a 4.250 bore as long as you have .200" wall thickness. So if you check the thickness first you can see if you can even get to that bore to begin with. A simple sonic test on engine assembly could have saved allot of agrivation and $$$ I have to admit I'm a little slack in that area myself. I tend to trust manufactures info more than I should.
#213
Teching In
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: DFW 888rwhp Land
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This thread has me shaking my head.. GM offers a N\A engine, the LSX454 and a boosted engine, LSX376.. Anyone thinking they can drop a bunch of boost on a the LSX454 should have done some research. There is a REASON GM says to boost the LSX376.. because that is what it is designed to do!! I have the LSX376 pushing 888rwhp out of it. Works GREAT, cost half as much as the LSX454.. Even on the corvette forum, I just laugh when people blow there LS7, which cannot handle more than 5-6psi.. They cry when they drop 9-10psi on it.. I bet the LSX454 may be able to handle 5-6psi max only with a spot on tune..
Believe it or not but GM engineers are smarter than you. This is why they have a boost friendly application available.. the LSX376.. and it delivers!
Believe it or not but GM engineers are smarter than you. This is why they have a boost friendly application available.. the LSX376.. and it delivers!
#214
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Burleson/Ftw,Texas
Posts: 3,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This thread has me shaking my head.. GM offers a N\A engine, the LSX454 and a boosted engine, LSX376.. Anyone thinking they can drop a bunch of boost on a the LSX454 should have done some research. There is a REASON GM says to boost the LSX376.. because that is what it is designed to do!! I have the LSX376 pushing 888rwhp out of it. Works GREAT, cost half as much as the LSX454.. Even on the corvette forum, I just laugh when people blow there LS7, which cannot handle more than 5-6psi.. They cry when they drop 9-10psi on it.. I bet the LSX454 may be able to handle 5-6psi max only with a spot on tune..
Believe it or not but GM engineers are smarter than you. This is why they have a boost friendly application available.. the LSX376.. and it delivers!
Believe it or not but GM engineers are smarter than you. This is why they have a boost friendly application available.. the LSX376.. and it delivers!
he has a good point, why would someone try and boost a high compression motor not designed for boost? Whatever happens is your own damn fault
#216
10 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: pembroke pines florida
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i just took apart our 454 lsx block first gen cylinder #6 has a hairline crack.coolant leaked into cylinder detonated head gasket between 6 and 8.na motor made 685 rwhp.what do u do can the block be fixed?
#219
TECH Apprentice
#220
10 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: pembroke pines florida
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts