PT88 too big for a 5.3?
Plan is:
Stripped 97, with enough interior to run our "street class"
Truck manifolds, pt88, a2a fmic
Th350/400, rmvb w/ brake, 9"
2 step, boost controller, etc
E85
Just a fun street strip car, I would like some easy 9s when everything is dialed in, and to hurt some feelings with an "lt1" car. So will it be alright on a 5.3 for a while while I dial the rest of the car? I don't want it to be a dog, but idk what to expect, this will be my first boooost build. Thanks!
Plan is:
Stripped 97, with enough interior to run our "street class"
Truck manifolds, pt88, a2a fmic
Th350/400, rmvb w/ brake, 9"
2 step, boost controller, etc
E85
Just a fun street strip car, I would like some easy 9s when everything is dialed in, and to hurt some feelings with an "lt1" car. So will it be alright on a 5.3 for a while while I dial the rest of the car? I don't want it to be a dog, but idk what to expect, this will be my first boooost build. Thanks!
I do not have the experience with the combo you are asking about. However, logic would suggest that that turbo on a 5.3 engine is going to be laggy and you are going to have to spin the 5.3 to a high RPM to get a usable power band. It wouldn't surprise me if that turbo didn't start making power until around 4500rpm on a 5.3. Again though, I dont have the experience with that combo.
EDIT: Anyone who has more knowledge than me PLEASE feel free to correct anything I am wrong on.
Trending Topics
http://www.precisionturbo.net/Street...PT8889-CEA/289
Apparently the PT8889 is not the turbo we are talking about in this case then?
Also, tight LSA = more valve overlap. Typically this is not desirable in a turbo app. Is this not the case with these engines?
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
http://www.precisionturbo.net/Street...PT8889-CEA/289
Apparently the PT8889 is not the turbo we are talking about in this case then?
Also, tight LSA = more valve overlap. Typically this is not desirable in a turbo app. Is this not the case with these engines?
It sure helps spool off of the line.....
http://www.precisionturbo.net/Street...PT8889-CEA/289
http://www.precisionturbo.net/Street...ger---PT88/283
Apparently the PT8889 is not the turbo we are talking about in this case then?
Also, tight LSA = more valve overlap. Typically this is not desirable in a turbo app. Is this not the case with these engines?
This is the turbo in question.
When I say I want easy 9s out of the car, I want to be able to start it up, do a burnout, and run 9s, easily and consistently. I will probably eventually push it and who knows where that will go. Our DA is typically 3000+ and usually not the best prepped surface, so an easy 9 would be a decent accomplishment.
I'd be more than happen to hear from someone that has tried done this or something similar. I don't want to buy a 5.3 and a better suited 70-76mm, run it for a month, swap to a forged motor, and then have to hope the pt88 fits where I have the exhaust merged, redo the down pipe, redo the intake, redo the cold side, etc. Not only would I be buying 2 turbos, but I'd be wasting time redoing ****.
Plan for the forged motor is a 370-390ci, AFRs or TFS, undecided on intake or cam until the time comes.
Last edited by FlashLCD33; May 2, 2011 at 01:36 AM.



