Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

gts 76 vs tc78

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2011, 04:48 PM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
southpaw0314's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: corpus christi, texas
Posts: 404
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default gts 76 vs tc78

what would you choose? I plan to run a stock 5.3 motor til I can build up my 6.0. I hope to get 650 out of the 5.3 and who knows what from the 6.0.
Old 06-26-2011, 05:14 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
HydroStream6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I've run both. The Precision makes gobs more power with very little loss in spool time.
Old 06-26-2011, 05:46 PM
  #3  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (91)
 
MUSTANGBRKR02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 4,599
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I'm with Hydro! I can't wait to upgrade over this TC unit.
Old 06-26-2011, 05:51 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (27)
 
evo462's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How do they compare in physical dimensions? My TC78 will more than push the short block I'm running to its limits...just wondering for future reference.
Old 06-26-2011, 05:56 PM
  #5  
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (17)
 
stock48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Posts: 3,672
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

If you go the TC go with the 76mm. I had a TC76 vs the T78 and the TC76 ran just as good or better, and spooled quicker. That little 68mm exh wheel doesn't spinn that extra 2mm as well.
Old 06-26-2011, 05:58 PM
  #6  
Launching!
 
91blowthru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

76gts have a 75mm turbine? That's the crappy part on the tc78, is the 68mm turbine wheel... can make some pretty good power on smaller c.i. tho...
Old 06-26-2011, 07:20 PM
  #7  
Launching!
iTrader: (11)
 
gallo-lo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ny LI 495.
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

im using a gt74 on my 5.3 build., its heavy than TC.
Old 06-26-2011, 09:40 PM
  #8  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I love my PTE76 it's an awesome unit. Quicker spool than you would expect and pulls to 6600 with my puny cam before it even feels like it's starting to lose steam.
Old 06-27-2011, 01:06 AM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
skinnies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: KS
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I've ran tc76/gts76 back to back in my firebird and now the tc78 and billet 7675 in the rx7 and ltd. The tc definitely spools faster, but does give up some power, just depends on how much you want to make, if you want 700rwhp or less go with the tc, otherwise go with the precision.
Old 06-27-2011, 08:24 AM
  #10  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
southpaw0314's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: corpus christi, texas
Posts: 404
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

how much difference is there in physical size?
Old 06-27-2011, 08:58 AM
  #11  
Launching!
 
91blowthru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Skinnies, did you ever measure/record backpressure when using the tc78, thats my only concern with my setup(using the tc78 on 6.0L) i know the turbine wheel sucks, but im using a 1.15 housing and 3 1/2" downpipe with good exhaust to try help it breath a LITTLE better up top (only plan on revving to 6000rpms...)
Old 06-27-2011, 10:57 AM
  #12  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by southpaw0314
what would you choose? I plan to run a stock 5.3 motor til I can build up my 6.0. I hope to get 650 out of the 5.3 and who knows what from the 6.0.
With what you are trying to achieve the TC76 and proper A/R housing will easily do it. Spool faster then anything else as well.
Old 06-27-2011, 04:57 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
HydroStream6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

The PT will be much better suited to the cubes of a built 6.0 than the TC. The TC will do 650 on a 5.3 no problem though. They're both good units honestly, but IMO, I'll happily give up a touch of spool for 100+ hp.
Old 06-27-2011, 08:25 PM
  #14  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
skinnies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: KS
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 91blowthru
Skinnies, did you ever measure/record backpressure when using the tc78, thats my only concern with my setup(using the tc78 on 6.0L) i know the turbine wheel sucks, but im using a 1.15 housing and 3 1/2" downpipe with good exhaust to try help it breath a LITTLE better up top (only plan on revving to 6000rpms...)
I never did, but I was on a .96 housing with 3.5" open downpipe. I'll stand behind my above 700rwhp switch to a precision. I've got my billet 7576 turned up on my ltd(highest it has seen is 24.5lbs) with no coolant issues. I think the tc would push coolant at this level with the high back pressure.
Old 06-27-2011, 09:13 PM
  #15  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I have the .96 housing and 3.5" DP and 3" exhaust. Mine spools nicely. I do plan on adding a 3.5" cut-out soon and a Eboost2 so I think those two mods will really help my spool time immensely.
Old 06-28-2011, 12:18 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
KILLER-LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

i had the tc78 and made 612rwhp. with NO CHANGES i installed the 76gts and made 723rwhp.
Old 06-28-2011, 01:09 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Chicago TDP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KILLER-LS1
i had the tc78 and made 612rwhp. with NO CHANGES i installed the 76gts and made 723rwhp.
WOW....that is a serious change...

How did the dyno graph look? Was the peak level at a lower or higher RPM?
With these numbers, if $$$ was not a problem, why would one run the TC78?
Old 06-28-2011, 08:19 PM
  #18  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

^Because they don't know any better. Bigger is better right?
Old 06-28-2011, 08:27 PM
  #19  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (27)
 
evo462's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by southpaw0314
how much difference is there in physical size?
Anyone?
Old 06-28-2011, 08:30 PM
  #20  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I remember reading in Z28Cobra Killers thread for his buddy that the Twin TC78's they replaced with PTE76's were the exact same in physical size, but the turbine wheel is a 75 on the pte where as its a 68 on the tc78 which is where the extra power comes from and the billet wheel on the pte helps spool time and helps deflection at high boost. IIRC


Quick Reply: gts 76 vs tc78



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 AM.