Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

FI-98X....question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-2011, 12:58 AM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default FI-98X....question

what cubic inch for fast spool-up....least amount of lag possible....

408ci
416ci
422ci

Says its rated at 1650 HP............like to maybe pound an LSX iron block with it.........

Curious how one gets rid of lag or almost gets rid of it............

.
Old 09-21-2011, 01:03 AM
  #2  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Lag is there just to give the other guy enough time to think he's winning before you remind him he should of nailed his doors shut as you blow by him.

Turbo lag is enevitable it's how they work, but once the power comes on, beleive you me, the last thing on your mind will be turbo lag.

With that said I'd go smallest C.I. possible as to have the least amount of backpressure possible. Turbo's operate best when backpressure equals boost pressure in a 1:1 ratio. When you get rid of lag completely or close to it, it means your about to reach the max potential of your turbo and it really isn't operating at it's full potential.

After reading that last sentence I wrote that isn't always true as a well matched combo, with the proper converter and gear will spool very quickly while still having a nice top end.
Old 09-21-2011, 01:07 AM
  #3  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Fbodyjunkie06
Lag is there just to give the other guy enough time to think he's winning before you remind him he should of nailed his doors shut as you blow by him.

Turbo lag is enevitable it's how they work, but once the power comes on, beleive you me, the last thing on your mind will be turbo lag.

With that said I'd go smallest C.I. possible as to have the least amount of backpressure possible. Turbo's operate best when backpressure equals boost pressure in a 1:1 ratio. When you get rid of lag completely or close to it, it means your about to reach the max potential of your turbo and it really isn't operating at it's full potential.
Huh..ok. Lets just talk about a 100% street car...highway roll runs only...no drag racing at all. So for a car that would be driven allot on the street, actually it will just be a street car. If it was say 370ci with that large single turbo.....would it be a pain in the *** to drive in normal driving conditions, meaning the turbo will reach a point and just HIT hard. Or will it be a manageable normal driving car if driven casually?

.
Old 09-21-2011, 01:29 AM
  #4  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

It will drive like a completely stock car out of boost depending on cam selection.
Old 09-21-2011, 01:31 AM
  #5  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

If your looking for something that spools better your going to need a smaller turbo like a pt88.
Old 09-21-2011, 01:39 AM
  #6  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Fbodyjunkie06
If your looking for something that spools better your going to need a smaller turbo like a pt88.
Yea, I also don't want the turbo to be maxed out on the edge. PT88 can;t make the power the FI98X (or FI91X) can though.........behind a 402ci will it have that backpressure you talked about?

I guess if I'm gonna do a roll race....it'll be spooled up before the start of the run.

.
Old 09-21-2011, 03:43 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Fb0dy0nly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Detroit ROCK City
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Fbodyjunkie06
With that said I'd go smallest C.I. possible as to have the least amount of backpressure possible.
Excuse me if Im wrong here but for someone who wants a bigger turbo and instant response or little lag in the setup, wouldnt a bigger cube motor be more suitable for those needs? It is know that the bigger the cubes of a motor, the more low end torque the engine would produce (everything else being the same internally between the two). So wouldnt this extra low end "kick" help spool the turbo up quicker, or at least get it going good enough to make a difference in how the turbo spools? I understand you want it to be efficient with the setup and near 1:1 but OP is looking for something with little lag which isnt always the combo that is going to make the fastest runs at the track... What Im saying is, sometimes you compromise.
Fighting lag issues and building boost is something it seems people fight with when running a bigger turbo; sort of one of those compromises for being able to run more boost and make more power; that part is inevitable.
Old 09-21-2011, 06:08 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Fireball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cecil County Raceway!!!
Posts: 8,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS6427
what cubic inch for fast spool-up....least amount of lag possible....

408ci
416ci
422ci

Says its rated at 1650 HP............like to maybe pound an LSX iron block with it.........

Curious how one gets rid of lag or almost gets rid of it............

.
bigger cubes will be best in terms of spoolup. need to properly match the a/r of the turbine housing to engine size...they offer a few sizes.

oh...and the 98x is rated at 1975hp...
Old 09-21-2011, 06:20 AM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (30)
 
djfury05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 3,430
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

the FI-98x is way more turbo than you'll ever need OP.. PT88 would be great.
Old 09-21-2011, 08:53 AM
  #10  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Fb0dy0nly
Excuse me if Im wrong here but for someone who wants a bigger turbo and instant response or little lag in the setup, wouldnt a bigger cube motor be more suitable for those needs? It is know that the bigger the cubes of a motor, the more low end torque the engine would produce (everything else being the same internally between the two). So wouldnt this extra low end "kick" help spool the turbo up quicker, or at least get it going good enough to make a difference in how the turbo spools? I understand you want it to be efficient with the setup and near 1:1 but OP is looking for something with little lag which isnt always the combo that is going to make the fastest runs at the track... What Im saying is, sometimes you compromise.
Fighting lag issues and building boost is something it seems people fight with when running a bigger turbo; sort of one of those compromises for being able to run more boost and make more power; that part is inevitable.
Absolutely 100% correct.
Old 09-21-2011, 12:13 PM
  #11  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by djfury05
the FI-98x is way more turbo than you'll ever need OP.. PT88 would be great.
Can a PT88 make 1,300 RWHP on a say a 402ci..........?

How about an S91 on a 402ci?

A goal is a goal...................

.
Old 09-21-2011, 12:29 PM
  #12  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Fireball
bigger cubes will be best in terms of spoolup. need to properly match the a/r of the turbine housing to engine size...they offer a few sizes.

oh...and the 98x is rated at 1975hp...
Mis-typed.....I meant the FI91X....1650 HP.

If someone has a goal of making 1,300 RWHP....how do you choose a turbo given those maximum HP ratings. AND not wanting to run a turbo to its max and have it breathing on the edge of its capabilities?

This was my next question today........you said above in your post, "match the a/r of the turbine housing to engine size."

How is this done so I can choose the proper combo before hand????

Maybe I'm asking for too much.......I want an engine that I can drive around casually if I want to, driving it like any normal car, not having the turbo smacking me in the *** when it his its "so called" sweet spot where it starts making boost..........but when I want to run it from 50-160mph thats where I want it to perform at its best.

.
Old 09-21-2011, 12:45 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Fireball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cecil County Raceway!!!
Posts: 8,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

either pick a turbo and design the engine around it or pick the engine and design a turbo around it...

you have two indepedant variables and have to fix one to come up with a solution. For example, I would not run a pt88 on anything over 350-360 cubes personally...otherwise you run out of compressor and the back pressure becomes a bitch.
Old 09-21-2011, 12:47 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
TracyRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

If you do twins, i highly recommend the billet 6765's.... I daily drive my car and it is very streetable and predictable.
Old 09-21-2011, 12:48 PM
  #15  
Banned
iTrader: (120)
 
Josh@KY-Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Fireball
either pick a turbo and design the engine around it or pick the engine and design a turbo around it...

you have two indepedant variables and have to fix one to come up with a solution. For example, I would not run a pt88 on anything over 350-360 cubes personally...otherwise you run out of compressor and the back pressure becomes a bitch.
Very Sound Advice here.
Old 09-21-2011, 01:18 PM
  #16  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Fireball
either pick a turbo and design the engine around it or pick the engine and design a turbo around it...

you have two indepedant variables and have to fix one to come up with a solution. For example, I would not run a pt88 on anything over 350-360 cubes personally...otherwise you run out of compressor and the back pressure becomes a bitch.
Ok. I see. Kind of..............

I want to reach a goal of 1,300 RWHP through a 4L80E. HP is what makes a roll racer.

FI91X seems like the choice in turbo, given its max rating of 1650 HP. So what cubic inch, heads and cam.

Gonna use the LSX iron block and 6 bolt heads....so I'm good there anyway.....

.

Last edited by LS6427; 09-21-2011 at 02:00 PM.
Old 09-21-2011, 02:23 PM
  #17  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
venom ws7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: EARTH
Posts: 5,967
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

408ci LSX with FI91X will be nasty and will spool very fast with the right cam/stall and compression.

Oh you should listen to Fireball and Josh@kyt for sure
Old 09-21-2011, 02:40 PM
  #18  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by venom ws7
408ci LSX with FI91X will be nasty and will spool very fast with the right cam/stall and compression.

Oh you should listen to Fireball and Josh@kyt for sure
If the right cam and stall are chosen...will a FI91X run out of compressor on a 408ci for highway pulls?

I'm asking about fast spooling because I "assume" the faster an engine can spool its turbo the closer to an N/A feel it will have. I see these twin-turbo engines on the dyno that NRE builds....when they snap the throttle its like an N/A engine, like no lag, yet they're making 1,600 HP 402ci with the LSX iron block, so it doesn't seem they're running out of compressor.

.
Old 09-21-2011, 03:00 PM
  #19  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
venom ws7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: EARTH
Posts: 5,967
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

IMO the turbo will be perfect for highway runs 50-170mph but of course I'm
Quoting Fireball "" match the a/r of the turbine housing to engine size ""
Old 09-21-2011, 03:33 PM
  #20  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (30)
 
djfury05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 3,430
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

what are you trying to outrun on the highway lol? good luck getting traction with 1300 hp jesus


Quick Reply: FI-98X....question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 AM.