Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Widening ring gaps???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2012, 07:40 PM
  #41  
TECH Apprentice
 
atomic 6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Omaha,Ne
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
So what causes #7 to go boom on a stock ls1 shortblock that was tune to 10.5:1 afr, 13 degrees of timing, no KR and 14psi of boost at 6500rpm?

Post a log of that run, if you have one.

what fuel was run?
Old 02-06-2012, 11:56 PM
  #42  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
skinnies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: KS
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by atomic 6
Post a log of that run, if you have one.

what fuel was run?
I'll bet pump gas
Old 02-07-2012, 06:00 AM
  #43  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

It was pump gas, 93. It let go on the highway in 4th gear at about 4000 rpm. Unfortunately, I had my laptop connected and sitting next to me, but forgot to turn the data logging back on, but I have more than 2 dozen logs of runs showing no knock.

I had the rear steam vents on the heads blocked off as I was using a FAST 90 intake, so I'm sure that cylinder got hot.

Are the thickness of the ring lands different on the 5.3l and 4.8l motors than the 5.7 ls1?
Old 02-07-2012, 06:06 AM
  #44  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
skinnies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: KS
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
It was pump gas, 93. It let go on the highway in 4th gear at about 4000 rpm. Unfortunately, I had my laptop connected and sitting next to me, but forgot to turn the data logging back on, but I have more than 2 dozen logs of runs showing no knock.

I had the rear steam vents on the heads blocked off as I was using a FAST 90 intake, so I'm sure that cylinder got hot.

Are the thickness of the ring lands different on the 5.3l and 4.8l motors than the 5.7 ls1?
bolded the problems that probably caused it
Old 02-07-2012, 06:16 AM
  #45  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Skinnies, do you guys run steam tubes to all 4 corners in your motors?
Old 02-07-2012, 06:33 AM
  #46  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
skinnies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: KS
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Yes I use the factory fbody 4 corner one
Old 02-07-2012, 07:57 AM
  #47  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Well, pump gas is all I have available, but in an attempt to keep it cool, I'm going to vent all four corners back to the radiator, go with a cooler t-stat, and go with Evans waterless coolant.

I could also go with methanol/water injection as well to help keep the pistons cooler.
Old 02-07-2012, 04:24 PM
  #48  
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (17)
 
stock48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Posts: 3,672
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
It was pump gas, 93. It let go on the highway in 4th gear at about 4000 rpm. Unfortunately, I had my laptop connected and sitting next to me, but forgot to turn the data logging back on, but I have more than 2 dozen logs of runs showing no knock.

I had the rear steam vents on the heads blocked off as I was using a FAST 90 intake, so I'm sure that cylinder got hot.

Are the thickness of the ring lands different on the 5.3l and 4.8l motors than the 5.7 ls1?
Same thickness, the 1.2mm rings have a tad thicker land due to the thinner ring. You can NEVER trust pump gas. Just because it says 91 or 93 doesn't mean it's not 87 or worse. Whenever pushing a stock engine you are taking a gamble with pump gas. E85 is offers sooo many benifites. Sucks it's 4hrs away from me.
Old 02-07-2012, 04:45 PM
  #49  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stock48
Same thickness, the 1.2mm rings have a tad thicker land due to the thinner ring. You can NEVER trust pump gas. Just because it says 91 or 93 doesn't mean it's not 87 or worse. Whenever pushing a stock engine you are taking a gamble with pump gas. E85 is offers sooo many benifites. Sucks it's 4hrs away from me.
Before you go there with the gasoline statements, I used to work for Sunoco as a formulation chemist and would do spot checks testing as well at pumps. It's big big penalties if you don't meet the minimum requirements of octane ratings at the pumps. It's why most refineries actually formulate the gas almost a full point higher in most cases to avoid issues at the pumps.
Old 12-09-2013, 06:14 PM
  #50  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Vetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Latvia
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

quick question, I had to use 2nd ring with .04" gap in one of the cylinders, will it cause any real problems (besides higher oil consumption)?

Last edited by Vetal; 12-10-2013 at 01:39 AM.
Old 12-09-2013, 08:02 PM
  #51  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
X-Bomb Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vetal
quick question, I had to use 2nd ring with .004" gap in one of the cylinders, will it cause any real problems (besides higher oil consumption)?
Your kidding right?
Old 12-10-2013, 01:27 AM
  #52  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Vetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Latvia
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by X-Bomb Racing
Your kidding right?
Yes, sorry Meant .04", not .004

Last edited by Vetal; 12-10-2013 at 01:40 AM.
Old 12-10-2013, 07:25 AM
  #53  
TECH Fanatic
 
a4ls2goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

800whp here. 144mph trap @ 4000lbs on a 4.8.
Stock ring gaps. E85...
Old 12-10-2013, 08:22 AM
  #54  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,974
Received 737 Likes on 542 Posts

Default

Ran 8s as well, not making near the power some of these other guys are though. JY 2001 5.3, 24lbs E85 fuel. Gapped .024 .028. Had some blow-by Nothing horrible.

Bottom line is you have no idea what the rings are at unless u check. It is a gamble. My 160k motor had a top ring gaps as small as .018. (i believe someone was into the motor at one point as well)

Its pretty simple and easy to pull one and check for peace of mind IMO. Then again while your there might as well Gap them. Just dont over gap.

.006 x bore is pretty standard boost ring gap. So .022 should be good for a 5.3, which seems to be around what most high mileage motors are.

Last edited by Forcefed86; 12-10-2013 at 11:49 AM.
Old 12-10-2013, 08:46 AM
  #55  
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (17)
 
stock48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Posts: 3,672
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
Before you go there with the gasoline statements, I used to work for Sunoco as a formulation chemist and would do spot checks testing as well at pumps. It's big big penalties if you don't meet the minimum requirements of octane ratings at the pumps. It's why most refineries actually formulate the gas almost a full point higher in most cases to avoid issues at the pumps.
I guess it must depend on where you are because I have seen otherwise. All it takes is one bad tank and you're done on a 14 psi boost pump gas deal. I run pump/meth in my truck and have never blown an engine due to the gas because Im really in tune with things, but several times I could have. I have had tanks of fuel that I can hear ping on 12 psi and otheres that will take 16psi....
On a side note I just pulled apart a 140k lq4 that had .024" ring gap, and a 34k mile 6.2L L92 that had .014" gap....
Old 12-10-2013, 09:52 AM
  #56  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (5)
 
ButchB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
.006 x bore is pretty standard boost ring gap. So .022 should be good for a 5.3, which seems to be around what most high mileage motors are.
Good info, thanks
Old 12-10-2013, 09:58 AM
  #57  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stock48
I guess it must depend on where you are because I have seen otherwise. All it takes is one bad tank and you're done on a 14 psi boost pump gas deal. I run pump/meth in my truck and have never blown an engine due to the gas because Im really in tune with things, but several times I could have. I have had tanks of fuel that I can hear ping on 12 psi and otheres that will take 16psi....
On a side note I just pulled apart a 140k lq4 that had .024" ring gap, and a 34k mile 6.2L L92 that had .014" gap....
I agree 100% with what you're saying, and it's the reason I also run meth injection. It's a nice safety factor when on pump gas. I'm also conservative with my tune as well. My motor popped 2 years ago because 1, I had stock pistons and tight rings, 2, I wasn't spraying meth/water yet, 3, I had the rear steam vents blocked, which is a debatable subject if it's a factor or not. I measured my ring gap on number 7, and it was only 0.013 or 0.014, I forget, might have been even tighter.
Old 12-10-2013, 01:32 PM
  #58  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Vetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Latvia
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What should I do with .04" 2nd ring gap in one cyl, is it acceptable, or is it critical?
Old 12-10-2013, 04:01 PM
  #59  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Vetal
What should I do with .04" 2nd ring gap in one cyl, is it acceptable, or is it critical?
Is it right, no, is it critical, that's a tougher question. It all depends on what you consider acceptable.
Old 12-10-2013, 06:34 PM
  #60  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Vetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Latvia
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Haynes manual even says up to .04" is OK, so I guess for mild engine refresh I should be OK. Hell, I found out today that #1 piston head TWO top rings instead of top+2nd. Still worked just the same as other cylinders somehow


Quick Reply: Widening ring gaps???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 PM.