Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Got My STS Turbo Kit Today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-25-2004, 09:53 PM
  #21  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 10,010
Received 45 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

i read the call out thread.. HAHAHA love those guys.
Old 03-25-2004, 10:42 PM
  #22  
TECH Apprentice
 
99Fbody99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MIGHTYMOUSE
i read the call out thread.. HAHAHA love those guys.
The list is growing large for the Turtle..

Eventually he will get punked out here too, some people dont have a clue, and when the light bulb does go on , its to late..

Dave
Old 03-25-2004, 11:30 PM
  #23  
On The Tree
 
93turboLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portage, MI
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think that system ROCKS and is prolly just as simple or simpiler to install then any supercharger kit, with equal results. This kit removes practically all the headaches of a usaual turbo installation on a V8 its amazing. Not to mention all the advantages it has over a supercharger....boost adjustablity...for one I think is its greatest feature. But...i wouldn't go buy one from them...3400!! goodness thats still outragous...make you own! I'm in the process right now. I have my turbo, boost controller, gauges, tubing, and oil lines all for under $300. ( got my turbo off ebay... Don't believe the price! Now all I need is the oil scavenging system, wastegate and blowoff valve...~$300 off ebay all together...damn looks like I just bought mine for way under a $1000....but then again i'm taking a lot of risks that come along with doing it myself. Reliability, affectiveness...where that STS is provin, and all ready to install. Well anywho post those result to prove that system! I can't wait either.
Old 03-25-2004, 11:59 PM
  #24  
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
 
CAT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

turtle thread is to deep. Wonder how I would have turned out if I had stayed in MI? Scary!
Old 03-26-2004, 09:56 AM
  #25  
9 Second Club
 
2001-WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CAT3
turtle thread is to deep. Wonder how I would have turned out if I had stayed in MI? Scary!
You would have been significantly more stir crazy in the spring waiting for the last of the salt to wash off the roads.

Rick
Old 03-26-2004, 11:03 AM
  #26  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Excal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i think the difference is...

the STS kit is not limited to that 60-1 turbo. just like you can pay 5000 or whatever for the smaller QMP kit, the sts has the 60-1.

as long as you pay the diff for a bigger turbo they will adjust.

it's still the cheapest way to 500hp
Old 03-26-2004, 11:21 AM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
White_Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by YOUR03COBRA8ME
Rightttttt That was one lame comment, My turbo kit must suck A$$ Because it wasnt $9000+$1500 Install, So i guess i have a low end turbo kit that makes no power, so what makes it like powerdyne
Bring it on Powerdyne
Best $3400 ever spent on my car

It doesn't suck, but once you realize it's limits you are going to be wanting to step up to a used incon or a qmp, that's all. Boost is just as addictive as nitrous. It's a turbo starter kit like the powerdyne is a blower starter kit - both cost effective, but limited in ultimate performance relative to the big guns (ATI, Vortech, QMP, incon, etc).

-Geoff

p.s. My old powerdyne is back up for sale for like $1300 right now by the guy who bought it from the guy I sold it too and never installed it.
Old 03-26-2004, 11:25 AM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
White_Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Excal
it's still the cheapest way to 500hp
500? I think trturbo has 412 in his sig. That LT1 making 500 was built pretty good in addition to the STS.

-Geoff
Old 03-26-2004, 11:28 AM
  #29  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
YOUR03COBRA8ME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Corol Springs Florida
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

412 on 5 psi stock fuel system
Old 03-26-2004, 11:32 AM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
 
trtturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newark, Tx.
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It is 412 on stock fuel system. Give it some more fuel and 8psi and your at 500.
remember, I have no mods, not headers, cam, nothing that would add any power
Old 03-26-2004, 11:52 AM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
rons 00z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: omaha, NE
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

a regular turbo wont work like the sts kit. sts uses a diffrent housing (from what they say) specificly designed for this kit

Originally Posted by 93turboLT1
I think that system ROCKS and is prolly just as simple or simpiler to install then any supercharger kit, with equal results. This kit removes practically all the headaches of a usaual turbo installation on a V8 its amazing. Not to mention all the advantages it has over a supercharger....boost adjustablity...for one I think is its greatest feature. But...i wouldn't go buy one from them...3400!! goodness thats still outragous...make you own! I'm in the process right now. I have my turbo, boost controller, gauges, tubing, and oil lines all for under $300. ( got my turbo off ebay... Don't believe the price! Now all I need is the oil scavenging system, wastegate and blowoff valve...~$300 off ebay all together...damn looks like I just bought mine for way under a $1000....but then again i'm taking a lot of risks that come along with doing it myself. Reliability, affectiveness...where that STS is provin, and all ready to install. Well anywho post those result to prove that system! I can't wait either.
Old 03-26-2004, 01:04 PM
  #32  
Teching In
 
drmatera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: south Fl.
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

cool, i'l be at moroso tonight (if it doesn't rain) to witness the runs. I saw the black LT1 car run a few months back.. i was impressed as it was trapping in the 113mph range.
Old 03-26-2004, 02:22 PM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
White_Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by YOUR03COBRA8ME
412 on 5 psi stock fuel system
Originally Posted by trtturbo
It is 412 on stock fuel system. Give it some more fuel and 8psi and your at 500.
So I am just trying to understand here. You add three more psi and you gain 88 rwhp with additional fuel? That just doesn't add up to me. You need more than fuel and three psi to pick up that much power.

-Geoff
Old 03-26-2004, 02:50 PM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
 
trtturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newark, Tx.
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

One of the test cars at STS went from 416 to 509 just from going to 8psi; no additional mods. This car was a stock LS1.
Old 03-26-2004, 03:14 PM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
 
WS6snake-eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: La Porte, TX
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I wonder how this kit would perform on top of a H/C setup????? What do you guys think about running a G5X-3 cam with forced induction?
Old 03-26-2004, 03:35 PM
  #36  
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
 
CAT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am curious as to the other units available. When first emailed them I thought they said it would be basic with the 60-1, or as an option could have 66 or 70 something like that. I would imagine changing out the headunit would require chagning out the tubing to some extent as well since its all designed together (larger turbo larger tubing ?). Cant wait to hear your results.

Charlie
Old 03-26-2004, 03:48 PM
  #37  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Excal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that lt1 ended up being built, that has nothing to do with the power it put down BUT it's a good idea if you do landspeed racing.

i mean you COULD run around withs 200 shot of n20, the fact that you "build it pretty good" doesn't mean it needed rockers to make that extra power.

specially whren that lt1 sees work in the salt flats in utah, the owner wants it in the 200mph area so it was a matter of time anyways.. also that was beyond 500 to the wheels at that altitude, AND it was a lt1.

also the diff between this and the powerdyne is that powerdynes is a SC lthat needs installing like anyother and happens to not make power. while the whole purpose for the sts is to be streetable and not a race kit.

the Turbotech base kit is become pointless as long as the STS kits don't blow up or something...

if a year down the road you want more hp, you can always go bigger like with any other turbo kit as long as you get it from them.

Last edited by Excal; 03-26-2004 at 04:02 PM.
Old 03-26-2004, 03:59 PM
  #38  
Teching In
 
drmatera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: south Fl.
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

it's very easy to believe 3 psi could make 80+ more HP. I did it on a chassis dyno with a turbocharged 5.0 stang. From 6-8psi it picked up an average of 37rwhp per lb. of boost. it made 350rwhp at 6psi and ended up around 425 at 8psi
Old 03-26-2004, 07:06 PM
  #39  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
White_Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by drmatera
it's very easy to believe 3 psi could make 80+ more HP. I did it on a chassis dyno with a turbocharged 5.0 stang. From 6-8psi it picked up an average of 37rwhp per lb. of boost. it made 350rwhp at 6psi and ended up around 425 at 8psi
On a non-intercooled rear mount turbo? Apples to apples please.

-Geoff
Old 03-26-2004, 07:24 PM
  #40  
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
 
CAT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

White hawk, I am sure you know the STS uses its remote location for its IC effect.


Quick Reply: Got My STS Turbo Kit Today



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 PM.