Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

5.3 Twin On3 70mm's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-2012, 07:20 PM
  #61  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
T76s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: superior, wi
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 71 chevy
I prefer ideal setups over worst case scenarios.
Yeah i totally agree. I wouldn't think about doing twin gt45's but if he wants to do them I'm saying the nitrous would make them somewhat usable for the strip. On the street, i think it would suck *** to do twin gt45's. The on3 70's will do just fine for wicked. Me personally would do the 61's because i drive on the street all the time and want instant boost.
Old 09-21-2012, 07:48 PM
  #62  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Do you have a link for the 61's?
Old 09-21-2012, 08:24 PM
  #63  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
71 chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas, Tejas
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Wicked69
It's kind of hard to go against 71 chevy. He has done this and run some damn good times. A good point is the 70's would bolt right on with no modifications. The GT45's would need some modifications and definitely need the nitrous. So probably is just better to sale the nitrous kit cheap and get the ON370's. This way it would be good on both the street and the strip.

Lots of good input but I'll go ahead and give the on3 70's a shot first.

Thanks for the kind words. ive been overturbo'd and overcammed,

then underturbo'd and undercammed, and going under is more fun than going over
Old 09-23-2012, 06:39 PM
  #64  
TECH Resident
 
Tjabo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by a-low
Dang that looks like the size of a BW turbo. Any idea on how much it weighs?
Mine just got delivered and it is HEAVY! The UPS man commented that it seemed heavier than the 25# it said on the label. After I had put it back in the box and taped it up I remembered I wanted to weigh it. The box was sufficient, but not real heavy so I just weighed it all together. 35 pounds!

I doubt the box and packing adds up to 2 pounds (EDIT: I had to unpack the turbo to measure it for a downpipe V-Band flange, so I weighed it while I had it out of the box and sure enough, 33#), so this is a seriously heavy turbo. Having said that, I just read some of the recent threads on turbo explosions and it caused me to think that some mass in a turbo might not be a bad thing if it is in the turbine housing, etc...

And one other observation, I've had quite a few turbos over the years, and this one seems very nice quality in comparison to the others that I've had (most recently a nice billet wheel Precision that smoked, but did not blow up. Lol).

Last edited by Tjabo; 09-24-2012 at 09:51 PM. Reason: Additional information
Old 09-23-2012, 08:27 PM
  #65  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (26)
 
a-low's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Whittier, Kalifornia
Posts: 578
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks for the info tjabo. Sux to here about precision turbos i hear their turbos are pretty badass but customer service blows. If the gt45 didnt have that small compressor id be all over it.
Old 09-24-2012, 10:50 AM
  #66  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
T76s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: superior, wi
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Hey sarg, their isn't a link i emailed Chad to get specs and pricing. If you look on Ebay under on3's 4.0 mustang turbo kit they have some specs of their 61mm
Old 09-24-2012, 11:20 AM
  #67  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Gotcha. Wonder what size the turbine wheels are. Sounds like it might be a tad smaller than a 35r. 525 hp max.
Old 09-24-2012, 08:53 PM
  #68  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
T76s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: superior, wi
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Their turbines are 65mm like the rest. I think they'll work out perfect
Old 09-26-2012, 03:47 AM
  #69  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
smokeshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 6,687
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

I just put twin T70s on my L76 and its a laggy bitch...I was coming from an S480 1.32AR with a quick spool valve, now am running the 70s with the .68AR housings. I used to be able to foot brake whatever boost I wanted fairly quickly, but now after 4-5 seconds it'll only hit around 4-5psi. This is with 4700ft DA, but still noticeably slower spool than the 80mm. May have to grab some of those on3 61mm turbos.
Old 10-31-2012, 08:18 PM
  #70  
TECH Fanatic
 
99VetteFRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Felton Pa
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I've spent a whole year building my 4.8 tt project and used the Ebay t70's. The turbos are so laggy, I hate them. I can't get them to make over 6psi with 8psi springs. They don't start to spool untill 3000 rpm and doesn't make full boost untill almost 4000rpm. It went a best pass 13.60 @ 103 with a 2.22 60'. HELP!!!
Old 10-31-2012, 08:46 PM
  #71  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

LMAO that is not that laggy at all for 70mm turbos. Get a good stall converter and a 2 step. And quite honestly the springs are just a ball park, they are not always exact.
Old 10-31-2012, 08:50 PM
  #72  
TECH Apprentice
 
silver_82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ft. Wayne
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Whats the afr and timing? What fuel? Intercooled?
Old 10-31-2012, 09:07 PM
  #73  
TECH Fanatic
 
99VetteFRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Felton Pa
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by silver_82
Whats the afr and timing? What fuel? Intercooled?
I have FMIC and the afr stays between 11.2- 11.5 and I tried timing all over the board. I tried timing it like a N/A car till about 3400 then went to 21* at one point. It's losing so much on the bottom end.

I also run 93 octane and have a 3000 stall.
Old 10-31-2012, 09:28 PM
  #74  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
ZNix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Plympton, MA
Posts: 193
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99VetteFRC
I have FMIC and the afr stays between 11.2- 11.5 and I tried timing all over the board. I tried timing it like a N/A car till about 3400 then went to 21* at one point. It's losing so much on the bottom end.

I also run 93 octane and have a 3000 stall.
Do you know what the actual stall is? A turbo stall is completely different than an N/A stall. Go brake boost the car till you see 0-1PSI of boost. That will give you the stall RPM. I am willing to bet it is too tight. Also.. Get a boost controller and add some boost. 6# isn't going to get you anywhere..

Zack
Old 10-31-2012, 10:54 PM
  #75  
TECH Regular
 
LilJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Whats the CAM look like in these laggy motors???

4.10 rear gear... really???? You are letting the engine have SOOO much mechanical advantage here that the motor never loads the turbos up to make them work!!!! Get a 3.42 in the thing....

Get the air fuel up in the 12.3-12.5 range till it starts making 2-3 psi then then bring it down to 11.5. Leave ALL the timing in it till 5-6.... hell on alot of tunes i dont start pulling timing till 8!

9 times outta 10... lag isnt the TURBOS FAULT....its in the tune and setup!
Old 11-01-2012, 12:55 AM
  #76  
TECH Enthusiast
 
95bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Complete truth ^^
Old 11-01-2012, 05:02 AM
  #77  
TECH Fanatic
 
99VetteFRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Felton Pa
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I had 3.08 gears in it and it was way worse. It does have a stock cam and LS6 springs. I don't wanna go to big on the converter, it is a pure street car, and it flashes at 3000 but if I powerbrake it it starts driving through the brakes at 2200 or so. I figured my SETUP was bad, thought the turbos were just to big for a stock 4.8. When idling they stop spinning completly.
Old 11-01-2012, 06:00 AM
  #78  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Well, they ARE 70mm turbos. You can't expect magic out of them and the turbine tech is probably not exactly the latest greatest compared to a Borg or Garret. If you were looking for full spool by 3000 rpms then a pair of T3 sized turbos or smaller T4 turbos would have been a better bet and something in the 56-62mm range.

Some things to check and try in addition to the excellent advice from LilJohn. Make sure there are no exhaust leaks. Wrap any piping leading to the turbos. Both of those will aid in spool up. But you can only expect so much from those turbos. If you want them to spool up a little quicker try putting a little stiffer spring in there to make sure the gates are not cracking open too early.
Old 11-01-2012, 07:03 AM
  #79  
TECH Regular
 
LilJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99VetteFRC
I had 3.08 gears in it and it was way worse. It does have a stock cam and LS6 springs. I don't wanna go to big on the converter, it is a pure street car, and it flashes at 3000 but if I powerbrake it it starts driving through the brakes at 2200 or so. I figured my SETUP was bad, thought the turbos were just to big for a stock 4.8. When idling they stop spinning completly.
Until you are prepared to put a cam in that motor... it will never do what you want it to do. Plain and simple. Had you left the gear alone and done a cam and springs you would be alot happier right now.

The stock cam just does not have the valve events anywhere close to proper to drive those turbos.

I tune a 331 sbf with a 218/218 @.050 hydraulic roller that does the same thing. At idle you can reach in and grab the compressor nut on the S480 and stop it completely.

Proper cam and springs, 400 more on the stall, and back to a more proper gear.... youd be much happier with your decision to go twins.
Old 11-01-2012, 11:24 AM
  #80  
TECH Fanatic
 
99VetteFRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Felton Pa
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LilJohn
Until you are prepared to put a cam in that motor... it will never do what you want it to do. Plain and simple. Had you left the gear alone and done a cam and springs you would be alot happier right now.

The stock cam just does not have the valve events anywhere close to proper to drive those turbos.

I tune a 331 sbf with a 218/218 @.050 hydraulic roller that does the same thing. At idle you can reach in and grab the compressor nut on the S480 and stop it completely.

Proper cam and springs, 400 more on the stall, and back to a more proper gear.... youd be much happier with your decision to go twins.
I was looking into LS6 cam(already have the springs) but can't nfind anything I can afford. Trade and barter system here. My stepfather's boss was supposed to give me a stock LS1 cam but I haven't heard anything about that yet. I don't wanna go too big on the converter, it would make the thing a pig to drive on the street with a th350.


Quick Reply: 5.3 Twin On3 70mm's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07 AM.