Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Lower static compression???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2012, 10:27 AM
  #1  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Pat Burton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Lower static compression???

Has any one stacked two Cometic MLS head gaskets together to lower their static compression? I know stacking sounds bad but the MLS gaskets are basically stacked gaskets anyways. I just didn't know if this has been tested on a boosted motor.

I am sitting at 10.0:1 and would love to be in the 9's or even 8's. I am getting my heads machined and going to gain about 5cc in the combustion chamber.
Old 11-12-2012, 10:30 AM
  #2  
TECH Regular
 
LilJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

And exactly whats leading you to want to reduce the static compression?
Old 11-12-2012, 10:41 AM
  #3  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Pat Burton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I want to lower my static compression so I can increase my volumetric efficiency and allow more boost without spark retard.
Old 11-12-2012, 11:25 AM
  #4  
ss1
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (32)
 
ss1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scarborough, Maine
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

You can buy Cometics in almost any thickness you can imagine...within reason.
Old 11-12-2012, 01:07 PM
  #5  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (64)
 
dschmittie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: York, PA
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I think stacking gaskets would be a bad idea. what fuel are you running and how much power are you looking for. My current motor is 10:1CR running E85 My last motor was 9.9:1CR on 93 and Meth.
Old 11-12-2012, 01:49 PM
  #6  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Pat Burton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dschmittie1
I think stacking gaskets would be a bad idea. what fuel are you running and how much power are you looking for. My current motor is 10:1CR running E85 My last motor was 9.9:1CR on 93 and Meth.
Just talked with a guy from cometics. He said they can do a 0.140 mls gasket. That will get me down into the 8.xx:1's. Right now im running a 10.0 with 11 lbs of boost. Im looking to build around 20lbs. Im hoping to get into the 8's with a 383. Anyone know of a better compression ratio to run from experience? Im running 110 shell unleaded gas.
Old 11-12-2012, 01:51 PM
  #7  
FormerVendor
 
qqwqeqwrqwqtq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WWW.SPEEDINC.COM
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pat Burton
Anyone know of a better compression ratio to run from experience? Im running 110 shell unleaded gas.
Yes, leave it at 10.0-1 unless you're trying to reduce power and response.
Old 11-12-2012, 02:20 PM
  #8  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Pat Burton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by INTMD8
Yes, leave it at 10.0-1 unless you're trying to reduce power and response.
Hmmm. I've read different articles saying that you should run a lot lower CR's if you are trying add a lot of boost. So what is the optimal CR if the engine was at 10.0:1 at 11 lbs of boost when I am trying to get around 20 lbs. I was running a p600b and now I'm switching to an F1-R
Old 11-12-2012, 02:31 PM
  #9  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
chasgiv3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If you want to run big boost on pump gas then that's a different story. But at 110 I don't see an issue.
Old 11-12-2012, 02:36 PM
  #10  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (64)
 
dschmittie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: York, PA
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pat Burton
Hmmm. I've read different articles saying that you should run a lot lower CR's if you are trying add a lot of boost. So what is the optimal CR if the engine was at 10.0:1 at 11 lbs of boost when I am trying to get around 20 lbs. I was running a p600b and now I'm switching to an F1-R
I have seen 16 psi on my 10:1 385 cubic inch motor on E85 powered my 3400lb car to an 8.79@158 Saturday. I plan on turning it up closer to 20 psi next season
Old 11-12-2012, 02:41 PM
  #11  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Pat Burton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dschmittie1
I have seen 16 psi on my 10:1 385 cubic inch motor on E85 powered my 3400lb car to an 8.79@158 Saturday. I plan on turning it up closer to 20 psi next season
What is your guys's IAT's? I'm not planning on running meth or nitrous. I run a water to air intercooler that keeps my IAT's below 100 degrees F
Old 11-12-2012, 02:50 PM
  #12  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (64)
 
dschmittie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: York, PA
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

No Meth and a cheap E-bay air to Air intercooler my IAT's are 140ish
Old 11-12-2012, 02:59 PM
  #13  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Pat Burton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dschmittie1
No Meth and a cheap E-bay air to Air intercooler my IAT's are 140ish
Damn thats not bad for air to air... Is 10.0 what many people run? I just want to be on the safe side because it isn't too hard to slap on a thicker head gasket. I was thinking about hittin 9.5:1 just to be safe. I guess there is more factors that just CR, like cam and valve events and keeping the heat down. So I guess I could stick with 10.0:1 and try and keep the air cool? Any other insight?
Old 11-12-2012, 03:04 PM
  #14  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (64)
 
dschmittie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: York, PA
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I know of an Outlaw drag radial car that was a 427 with 10:1 CR and saw 40 psi
Old 11-12-2012, 05:10 PM
  #15  
TECH Regular
 
jridenour31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I don't see the point of this at all. 10-1 is fine for boost. Dynamic is more important anyway.



Quick Reply: Lower static compression???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:02 PM.