Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Wat size ... On crossover

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2013, 04:05 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
AR's LSnotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Wat size ... On crossover

Sup guys am about to start doing my hot parts doing a LS swap on my 89 mustang notch . Running a 2007 5.3 with truck manifolds flipd .. Still have my crossover hot parts from my old set up 357w but is a 3 inch cross over the turbo I have an planning on running is a T6 s400 Borg Warner 75 mm 1.32 AR . An my question is will that kill me if I run this turbo wit a 3 inch crossover on my 5.3 . Will I have alot of boost lag

Am planing on running 14 to 18 psi of boost
Wit supporting mods


Thanks
Old 05-16-2013, 04:39 PM
  #2  
Staging Lane
 
88mmrocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Dunn, NC
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

3" is too big. Yes it will work and it will have some lag but if this is going to be a track only car then it may be ok. The issue will Be when out of boost and trying to get back in to it.....ie blowing the tires off and trying to recover.

Run 2.5" or 2.25" pipe if you can. You are going to need the velocity to spin the turbine wheel.

It will fly though!
Old 05-16-2013, 04:48 PM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
AR's LSnotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

One of my buddy's told me is to big but wanted to kno if it will really kill me ... I got a straight pipe that I'm gonna use then is 2 7/16 for crossover an another question
Can I use that same t6 merge 3 inch to the turbo or should I go all the way 2 7/16 "
Old 05-16-2013, 06:41 PM
  #4  
TECH Regular
 
jridenour31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Definitely too big, 2.5" max.
Old 05-16-2013, 07:21 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
conan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Back in the Burg
Posts: 6,492
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Not a turbo guy but I read through this a while back, might help you out.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...over-pipe.html
Old 05-16-2013, 11:59 PM
  #6  
9 Second Club
 
shawnc16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2 1/4. Fits perfectly with a divided T6 flange as well for the merge.
Old 05-17-2013, 09:48 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
TurboJoe@Straightline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lol...this is more of that hocus pocus...2.5 is great cuz everyone has that size and it works great. But after a couple big boost cars we have had on the dyno and seeing there spool times with huge turbos and smaller motors with there "horrible" sized hot sides I find that it just does not matter that much! Guy yesterday with 2 in primary's and a 3 in crossover made north of 1200 and boost was there around the 36-37 mark. Just do what u can get and make work.

Look up willamz on here and his tiny 5.7 with 3in crossover. He has a 3in crossover and it did not affect his stupid numbers!
Old 05-17-2013, 10:21 AM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
BMF_Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Alexandria, Ky
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've always used 2.5", but may use 2.25 or 2" in the future (pending on the hp goals). There was a guy recently post up 850whp with 2" crossover with no back pressure issues. Really no benifit at all for 3" in my eyes (cost more than 2.5 and 2.25" and is slower to spool due to the greater area). Just my $0.02, GL.
Old 05-17-2013, 11:50 AM
  #9  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
bad6as's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ide say 2.25 On that combo
Old 05-17-2013, 12:35 PM
  #10  
TECH Regular
 
jridenour31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by TurboJoe@Straightline
Lol...this is more of that hocus pocus...2.5 is great cuz everyone has that size and it works great. But after a couple big boost cars we have had on the dyno and seeing there spool times with huge turbos and smaller motors with there "horrible" sized hot sides I find that it just does not matter that much! Guy yesterday with 2 in primary's and a 3 in crossover made north of 1200 and boost was there around the 36-37 mark. Just do what u can get and make work.

Look up willamz on here and his tiny 5.7 with 3in crossover. He has a 3in crossover and it did not affect his stupid numbers!
It's definitely not hocus pocus. Phil has posted tons of logs showing the difference in spool with different crossovers and primaries. Saying it doesn't make a difference is just flat out wrong.
Old 05-17-2013, 01:40 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
BMF_Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Alexandria, Ky
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jridenour31
It's definitely not hocus pocus. Phil has posted tons of logs showing the difference in spool with different crossovers and primaries. Saying it doesn't make a difference is just flat out wrong.
X2 true
Old 05-17-2013, 02:23 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (28)
 
Cam72aro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sugar Land, Tx
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I did 2.5, but if I had it to do again I would go 2" or 2.25" max. Blackws666 I think is the screen name did 3" and had a bunch of lag, went to smaller pipes and noticed a big difference.
Old 05-17-2013, 02:40 PM
  #13  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I have worked with guys that have done various different sizes. A properly sized pipe based on velocity will work better and make more power under the curve. Fact.

2" crossover, merged into a 2.5" that goes into the turbo, easily good to 1000rwhp.

I am still using a 2.5" on a 460" methanol 118mm combo.
Old 05-17-2013, 02:42 PM
  #14  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TurboJoe@Straightline
Lol...this is more of that hocus pocus...2.5 is great cuz everyone has that size and it works great. But after a couple big boost cars we have had on the dyno and seeing there spool times with huge turbos and smaller motors with there "horrible" sized hot sides I find that it just does not matter that much! Guy yesterday with 2 in primary's and a 3 in crossover made north of 1200 and boost was there around the 36-37 mark. Just do what u can get and make work.

Look up willamz on here and his tiny 5.7 with 3in crossover. He has a 3in crossover and it did not affect his stupid numbers!
Anyone can make power at the top end of the motors legs. Whats the boost curve look like, how does it come up on the converter or does that even matter?
Old 05-17-2013, 02:45 PM
  #15  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

And FWIW, turbine/Turbine housing dictates backpressure.
Old 05-17-2013, 02:58 PM
  #16  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
bad6as's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would redo mine again if i had the chance or the need, its 2.5'' Now. But this was befoe phill posted that info.
Old 05-17-2013, 10:42 PM
  #17  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I have not had one person say.... I wish I had stayed with my old 2.5 or 3" piping. Just sayin. Couple of people went to larger turbines.
Old 05-18-2013, 02:35 PM
  #18  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
AR's LSnotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shawnc16
2 1/4. Fits perfectly with a divided T6 flange as well for the merge.
I did my own merge 2 1/4 had to weld both sides on t6 flange an hit wit hammer to open the pipes wider to be able to weld inside an out to big of a gap
Old 05-18-2013, 02:37 PM
  #19  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
AR's LSnotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So should I do 2" for crossover an merge it to my 2 1/4 or go 2.5 all the way
Old 05-21-2013, 07:06 PM
  #20  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Roll with what you have and post the results.


Quick Reply: Wat size ... On crossover



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 PM.