Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Baddest small-size T4 turbo out there? Want to upgrade my TC78

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-13-2013, 01:18 AM
  #61  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Vetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Latvia
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

OK I've asked about Garrett, BW, PT, seems that since I don't have much space (or at least I think so), I will have to pay $$$$ for compact PT (or wait for a good deal for a used 7675 or PT88)
Old 09-13-2013, 07:45 AM
  #62  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vetal
OK I've asked about Garrett, BW, PT, seems that since I don't have much space (or at least I think so), I will have to pay $$$$ for compact PT (or wait for a good deal for a used 7675 or PT88)
Go PT8847. Don't waste time with 7675
Old 09-13-2013, 08:11 AM
  #63  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Vetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Latvia
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DrTurbo
Go PT8847. Don't waste time with 7675
It's 4X more $$ than I can sel my TC78 now...
In other words, didn't want to spend that much. Will PT88 be much worse? if I find used one till next season
Old 09-13-2013, 08:13 AM
  #64  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vetal
It's 4X more $$ than I can sel my TC78 now...
In other words, didn't want to spend that much. Will PT88 be much worse? if I find used one till next season
I would avoid the PT88. The 8847 is a much newer unit and better bearing package.
Old 09-13-2013, 08:22 AM
  #65  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Vetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Latvia
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

All right, everything is clear, thanks!
THE way to go is PT8847. Then there is PT7675. It all just depends on $$$$ now
Old 09-13-2013, 08:25 AM
  #66  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vetal
All right, everything is clear, thanks!
THE way to go is PT8847. Then there is PT7675. It all just depends on $$$$ now
Save a little extra
Old 09-13-2013, 12:19 PM
  #67  
Man-Crush Warning
iTrader: (1)
 
Shownomercy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,150
Received 119 Likes on 88 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DrTurbo
I would avoid the PT88. The 8847 is a much newer unit and better bearing package.
If my hotside and surround stuff fits in a 7675 well, would an 8847 drop right in without issue? (other than downpipe redo)
Old 09-13-2013, 12:28 PM
  #68  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Vetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Latvia
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by big reg
I have been looking at the FP HTA GT4205 journal bearing version. Forced performance makes awesome turbos. This has a 82 or 83mm turbine wheel too. On sale right now as well. I want to try it to do something different.
Almost overlooked this...
Is this the one you're talking about?
http://store.forcedperformance.net/m...tegory_Code=SP
Do you know dimensions of this thing? Judging by the weight (40#), must be quite big
Old 09-13-2013, 01:09 PM
  #69  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Vetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Latvia
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've studied logs from my GTech and realized that power starts to lower after 5500rpm on medium boost and after 5100rpm on higher boost. Torque peaks at 3800rpm in all cases. I have manual boost controller and cam is Thunder racing 214/220 .600/.523 115 LSA.
Does this sound like turbo is choked? Can that explain my low trap speed, converter keeping the engine at 6200 rpms where power has dropped considerably?
Old 09-13-2013, 01:22 PM
  #70  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
smokeshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 6,687
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Not necessarily a choked compressor, but definitely reaching the flow cap of that exhaust housing. Peak power at lower RPM with an increase in boost is characteristic of too much back pressure. It most certainly explains the lower trap speed.
Old 09-14-2013, 09:53 AM
  #71  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (28)
 
big reg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Vetal
Almost overlooked this...
Is this the one you're talking about?
http://store.forcedperformance.net/m...tegory_Code=SP
Do you know dimensions of this thing? Judging by the weight (40#), must be quite big
Yes it is but your space constraints probably won't allow it. I was looking at it on a 5.3 as well so only 325ci.
Old 09-14-2013, 10:08 AM
  #72  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vetal
Almost overlooked this...
Is this the one you're talking about?
http://store.forcedperformance.net/m...tegory_Code=SP
Do you know dimensions of this thing? Judging by the weight (40#), must be quite big
Same size as a GT42, or S400 T4.
Old 09-14-2013, 03:06 PM
  #73  
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (17)
 
stock48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Posts: 3,672
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Vetal
I've studied logs from my GTech and realized that power starts to lower after 5500rpm on medium boost and after 5100rpm on higher boost. Torque peaks at 3800rpm in all cases. I have manual boost controller and cam is Thunder racing 214/220 .600/.523 115 LSA.
Does this sound like turbo is choked? Can that explain my low trap speed, converter keeping the engine at 6200 rpms where power has dropped considerably?
Yes. You are loosing a lot with the converter slipping like that, and 214/.600" is too agressive of an intake lobe IMO. Like I told you before you need a good turbo converter. No reason why car shouldn't be trapping mid 140's+ with current turbo, and should go mid 150's with a 76/75.
Old 09-14-2013, 03:59 PM
  #74  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Vetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Latvia
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stock48
Yes. You are loosing a lot with the converter slipping like that, and 214/.600" is too agressive of an intake lobe IMO. Like I told you before you need a good turbo converter. No reason why car shouldn't be trapping mid 140's+ with current turbo, and should go mid 150's with a 76/75.
So you think my converter is slipping too much? I thought it was designed to stay around 6200+ and my problem is small turbo, no? Converter was custom built by very reputable company for my specific setup, so it was kinda out of suspect IMO...
Old 09-14-2013, 04:23 PM
  #75  
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (17)
 
stock48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Posts: 3,672
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

If you add more power the problem is just going to get worse. That's way too high unless trans is slipping or something. You want to shift a combo like that at 5800-6k max and converter should drop to 5-5200 rpm if it's right.
Old 09-16-2013, 03:00 AM
  #76  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Vetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Latvia
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stock48
If you add more power the problem is just going to get worse. That's way too high unless trans is slipping or something. You want to shift a combo like that at 5800-6k max and converter should drop to 5-5200 rpm if it's right.
Why should I limit myself to only 6000 rpm?
Don't know if tranny is slipping (I hope not at such low power), but at 6200 input, TC output is some 800-900 rpms behind
Old 09-16-2013, 03:14 AM
  #77  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Johnv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That turbo is done on a 383.

I had one on a 383, made just under 700 rwhp turbo was maxed and that was with a 1.32 ar exhaust housing.

I have since replaced the 383 with a forged 347, same turbo, same evrything else and made 770 rwhp, and the turbo still has a bit left in it..
works much better with the smaller cubes.
Old 09-16-2013, 05:10 AM
  #78  
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (17)
 
stock48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Posts: 3,672
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Vetal
Why should I limit myself to only 6000 rpm?
Don't know if tranny is slipping (I hope not at such low power), but at 6200 input, TC output is some 800-900 rpms behind
The TC78/68 can make 700 hp on 6.0L at 4800-5200 rpm after that it's down hill. If you keep the combo in it's power range it can do work but if it's running 1000 rpm past pk the ET and mph won't reflect the power. I have ran 129.xx with both a Tc76/68, and T78/68 on 6.0L @ 4850 lbs. There is anothe guy on here rhat ran low 9's at 150+ with a 370 ci mustang with a tc78/68. There is more in your combo and the converter is the first place I would look if it does not pull down below 6200 rpm under wot. If you want more rpm than you need more turbine but still you will likely pk at or below 6K even with a 76/75, or 88/94. As you add power the converter is just going to go higher. You can try some John Deere Hygurd in the trans it might tighten you up 2-400 rpm.
Old 09-16-2013, 10:44 AM
  #79  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Vetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Latvia
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stock48
The TC78/68 can make 700 hp on 6.0L at 4800-5200 rpm after that it's down hill. If you keep the combo in it's power range it can do work but if it's running 1000 rpm past pk the ET and mph won't reflect the power. I have ran 129.xx with both a Tc76/68, and T78/68 on 6.0L @ 4850 lbs. There is anothe guy on here rhat ran low 9's at 150+ with a 370 ci mustang with a tc78/68. There is more in your combo and the converter is the first place I would look if it does not pull down below 6200 rpm under wot. If you want more rpm than you need more turbine but still you will likely pk at or below 6K even with a 76/75, or 88/94. As you add power the converter is just going to go higher. You can try some John Deere Hygurd in the trans it might tighten you up 2-400 rpm.
OK, with current small turbo converter is very unmatched for the setup. But if I put normal-sized turbo that won't run out of steam, wouldn't I be perfectly fine with TC keeping my engine at let's say 6400rpm (a bit higher than current 6200 due to added high-rpm power) ?
Or do you still think it is slipping too much on its own and will do that even with PT 8847?
Old 09-16-2013, 12:29 PM
  #80  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Vetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Latvia
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Here's log from one of the runs in case anyone wants to advise
Attached Files
File Type: hpl
cr7.hpl (69.3 KB, 72 views)


Quick Reply: Baddest small-size T4 turbo out there? Want to upgrade my TC78



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 AM.