Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Going turbo lets hear your thoughts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-2013, 11:05 AM
  #21  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by necrocannibal
Well I have a Twin Turbo car that I have had since about March and have only driven 3 times because of stupid issues I cant seem to get worked out like the plug boots being so damn close to the manifold it melts them after a few pulls. Another issue is I get a good puff of blue smoke a lot of times when I stop. The car likes to run a little warm, was overheating but now it is better but still too warm for me. The car has a terrible exhaust leak somewhere that all of the exhaust side is going to have to be taken apart and seals replaced and on my way back from a friends house the steering column stared rubbing against the drivers side manifold when I am turning.

When I can drive it it is fun as hell but all of these little issues add up annoyance and money wise and I am starting to regret the turbos and wishing I had gone blower instead.
Trust me I've thought about SC it but the last thing this combo needs is more low end torque. Twins is a whole other animal to boot. A big single is ALOT less headache if you ask me.
Old 09-25-2013, 11:11 AM
  #22  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Capricio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RedRocketZ28
On3 is coming out with a 7875 turbo this Fall/Winter that might be worth looking into. I had no problems at all with my on3 turbo and my biddy will be running it on his Silverado shortly.
How would this new 7875 compare to the 88 they just started offering?

http://www.ebay.com/itm/On-3-Performance-T4-88mm-Turbo-LS1-LS2-LS3-LS6-LSX-6-0l-5-3l-Mid-Frame-1200hp-/130996317105?pt=Race_Car_Parts&hash=item1e7ffd2bb1&vxp=mtr
Old 09-25-2013, 11:22 AM
  #23  
TECH Resident
 
HRHohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Specs on the CX Racing GT45 80mm Ball bearing turbo are:

Air Inlet 5"
Compressed Air Outlet 3.25" Vband
Bearing Ceramic Ball Bearing on Compressor Side Compressor
Turbine Housing Flange Standard T4
Exhaust Outlet 3.5" V-Band
Cooling Oil Cooled
Compressor 0.60 A/R
Turbine 1.15 A/R
Compressor Wheel (Major/Exducer) 80/108mm
Turbine Wheel (Major/Inducer) 77.4/88.9 mm

Just for reference. Looks like a nice, high flowing, ball bearing turbo, for a good price.
Old 09-25-2013, 11:46 AM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Twin turbo c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A .96ar will work great on what you got. I had 383 with a 76mm that made 747 to the wheel on 16 psi. But over the years I've found that the 1.15 ex housings do well on ls based engines they seem to spool faster and don't run out on the big end. That's what I've learned . I have a s480 right now on a 6.0 with a stock cam and it works flawlessly.
Old 09-25-2013, 11:57 AM
  #25  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
RedRocketZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Madrid, IA
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Capricio
How would this new 7875 compare to the 88 they just started offering?

http://www.ebay.com/itm/On-3-Perform...fd2bb1&vxp=mtr
The 7875 would be a bit more compact than the 88mm but would have a bit less power potential.
Old 09-25-2013, 12:33 PM
  #26  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

That gt45 sounds dead nuts for what I need.
Old 09-25-2013, 12:51 PM
  #27  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Twin turbo c5
A .96ar will work great on what you got. I had 383 with a 76mm that made 747 to the wheel on 16 psi. But over the years I've found that the 1.15 ex housings do well on ls based engines they seem to spool faster and don't run out on the big end. That's what I've learned . I have a s480 right now on a 6.0 with a stock cam and it works flawlessly.
That's good to hear.
Old 09-25-2013, 01:07 PM
  #28  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Here is another question. Since I am necking the exhaust port down to 3" is the larger 1.15 vs. .96 going to matter? Will the BP actually be less with the 1.15 compared to the .96 with it exiting through a 3" DP?

I guess what I'm asking is this. Will The slower spool up of the 1.15 be justified with the drop in back pressure?
Old 09-25-2013, 01:44 PM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
jrpimp00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Id look at the Turbonetics or Precision 7875 or 7879...For example I put down the numbers in my sig at 12lbs and it made over 700with 2 more lbs on a lq4 with 3' exhaust and a cutout

Id also think about running meth at the higher boost levels to help with detonation if youre set on pump gas

Last edited by jrpimp00; 09-25-2013 at 06:11 PM.
Old 09-25-2013, 01:58 PM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Ryans99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OH & MI
Posts: 1,514
Received 122 Likes on 61 Posts

Default

Precison 7675 will you get there easily, so will the turbonetics unit. I made the numbers in my sig and turned it down to 14lbs, which is still over 700whp (it made 690 at 12lbs). When it comes to the power this turbo delivers and its physical size, its awesome. DO NOT waste your time with anything that has a turbine smaller than 75mm, especially on a 6.0l. BTW, my stock t56 has help up just fine and it gets raced all the time.

Leave the motor alone, put a cam in it if you want. Run E85 or 93+meth and turn the boost up. The bottom end will be just fine if your tune is good.
Old 09-25-2013, 02:04 PM
  #31  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
LS1 240sx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore,MD
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Heres one thing ive learned, Turbine wheel size is determined by how much the motor flows exhaust gas, Air ratio (a/r) is only used for tuning purposes, basically spool time/powerband . but of course early spool means less top end and vice versa. Just like what a CAM does.
Old 09-25-2013, 02:34 PM
  #32  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Good to hear fellas, with my mild cam and upgrades I have so far this 700 is looking doable.. Would you guys mind telling me what injectors your running? And if you have a good spot to pick up the turbo Im all ears.
Old 09-25-2013, 02:45 PM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Ryans99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OH & MI
Posts: 1,514
Received 122 Likes on 61 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by oscs
Good to hear fellas, with my mild cam and upgrades I have so far this 700 is looking doable.. Would you guys mind telling me what injectors your running? And if you have a good spot to pick up the turbo Im all ears.
If you have the room, you wont be disappointed with a BorgWarner turbo either, they are physically bigger but they can be had cheaper than the above turbos and never disappoint.

I run 80lb injectors but they are maxed at 16psi with E85. On 93 they would have plenty of room.
Old 09-25-2013, 02:58 PM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
 
mrstepheneades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ryans99ls1
Precison 7675 will you get there easily, so will the turbonetics unit. I made the numbers in my sig and turned it down to 14lbs, which is still over 700whp (it made 690 at 12lbs). When it comes to the power this turbo delivers and its physical size, its awesome. DO NOT waste your time with anything that has a turbine smaller than 75mm, especially on a 6.0l. BTW, my stock t56 has help up just fine and it gets raced all the time.

Leave the motor alone, put a cam in it if you want. Run E85 or 93+meth and turn the boost up. The bottom end will be just fine if your tune is good.
Yeah my little borg 75mm at 16psi on stock bottom ls1 has lasted 1000 miles so far also on stock t56 and run pretty hard. Meth and 93.
Ill know what its making at that level in a few weeks when I hit the dyno at Tick. FIC 1000cc injectors also here. Plenty of room to grow and not to big.
Old 09-25-2013, 03:16 PM
  #35  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
gnx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,491
Received 176 Likes on 116 Posts

Default

While a tc78 isn't perfect it has gone 9.0's@150mph on a lightweight 6.0 LS Mustang.

Spend the extra money on something with a 75mm turbine or bigger. For 700rwhp it'll be a cakewalk. I would run meth inj if you plan to use pump gas. You could always blend pump gas and e85 to make e50....

What gears out back?
Old 09-25-2013, 03:18 PM
  #36  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
LS1 240sx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore,MD
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lucas 120lb injectors w/aem driver here. Idles perfect at 900rpm.
Old 09-25-2013, 03:33 PM
  #37  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I'm hoping to keep the stock lq4 ecu. 80lbs is what I had in mind. I can find Bosch 80lb injectors cheap. I run an s366 on my 7.3 with a 46mm gate and that little bastard screams. It puts out 550whp no problem. I like BW but space is an issue wit this build. I'm also running an R200 rear diff with a 3.54 ratio, I like the spread a lot. Any suggestions on a good sized gate? Also brand? I like to save money where I can. Ill most Likely drop the coin on the charger and pinch elsewhere if I can
Old 09-25-2013, 03:42 PM
  #38  
TECH Fanatic
 
mrstepheneades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by oscs
I'm hoping to keep the stock lq4 ecu. 80lbs is what I had in mind. I can find Bosch 80lb injectors cheap. I run an s366 on my 7.3 with a 46mm gate and that little bastard screams. It puts out 550whp no problem. I like BW but space is an issue wit this build. I'm also running an R200 rear diff with a 3.54 ratio, I like the spread a lot. Any suggestions on a good sized gate? Also brand? I like to save money where I can. Ill most Likely drop the coin on the charger and pinch elsewhere if I can
Yeah Borg Warner is a Watermelon lol.
Old 09-25-2013, 05:07 PM
  #39  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
1999Firehawkls7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Drag racing = One big Single Turbo... Later Spool but holy hell Top end (Drag Racing ya only gotta spool it once and your done after making a pass)

Street Car = Twin Turbos that are smaller= Quicker spool time! (A Plus w a 6 spd Street Car)

Seen the under the hood pics....do ya got room for all this up front?!
Old 09-25-2013, 06:32 PM
  #40  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

There are a few guys running twins but they are dedicated race cars. I think I could make twins fit, that was my first thought. Honestly though with the weight of this car and a good low lag single turbo I think it will light a lot sooner than you fbody guys are used to. There tons of single turbo LSZ's out there. Here is a friends
Attached Thumbnails Going turbo lets hear your thoughts-image.jpg  


Quick Reply: Going turbo lets hear your thoughts



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 AM.