Quench on turbo engines
There's 2 ways to reach quench
Thinner head gasket such as .040 cometic head gasket, .007 piston out of the hole = .033 quench
.020 piston out of hole, .053 gm head gasket = .033 quench
My question is does it matter which way you go to achieve it? Cost wise the 2nd way is more expensive since you need to deck the block to reach .020 out of hole..
But is there a performance difference, side effects of doing it the 2nd way?
Because most people shoot for .035-.040 area
I should be shifting around 6600-6800 rpm so I'm thinking a tight quench might not be so bad.
If I was shifting 7k+ then I should be worried with tight quench..
How's that take on it?
I would not intentionally build any engine .020 out of the hole.
I would not intentionally build any engine .020 out of the hole.
Diamond -2cc flat tops (2618)
I'm running ls9 gaskets/ 317 heads
I didn't pick that quench, I wanted my block decked and after assembly my engine builder handed me my spec sheet and it says .020..
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Last edited by Bazman; May 28, 2020 at 05:14 AM.
Average ls1 piston out of hole is .005-.010 coupled with ls9 gaskets, is about .040-.045 quench...
So there's a lot of people that don't run .050-.100 quench on here if they are running gm head gaskets
The valve reliefs on the piston are -2cc, and my PTV clearance is very big since my heads cc are 72 and my cam is a 225/225 .571/.571 TU1 cam
So what can the piston hit if the head bore is bigger than the cylinder bore and I have a lot of valve clearance with valve reliefs?
Maybe my tight quench can work!
Lol I'm trying to justify this but ^^ that doesn't sound too crazy does it
Basically it comes down to intended purpose.
Basically it comes down to intended purpose.
I think there was a mix up at the machine shop and too much was cut off the deck, anyway I'm stuck with this quench unless I want to run a .060 cometic to open up quench..
Any tuners here think my combo would be hard to tune?




