Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

cam for twin gt45s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-29-2013 | 02:01 PM
  #41  
IMPATIENT 1's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: hugo okla.
Question

Originally Posted by Martin@Tick
231/239 114.5lsa.

I believe Wicked has been 6.0@116 with little boost with his 6.0 and twin turbo's at said weight with the new Holley EFI he has.
Martin im runnin a 218/229 545 114lsa cam in a 5.3 and just changed up from a single s480 deal to a twin on3 70mm .81ar turbine turbs on the racing innovation up n forward headers and was wondering if a new cam was in order to help drive the 70's harder or stick with what i have already.the lil cam pulled well to 6900 before the small turbine held it back.figure losing a ton of backpressure wld allow more rpms on same cam???? Maybe retard it 2-4*?? I see all these 112+4. cams and assume thats a 112lsa cam installed with 4* advance correct?
Old 11-29-2013 | 03:04 PM
  #42  
Sales@Tick's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 15
From: Mount Airy, NC
Default

I would honestly keep what you have. That sounds like a perfect cam for a 5.3.
Old 11-29-2013 | 03:51 PM
  #43  
IMPATIENT 1's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: hugo okla.
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Martin@Tick
I would honestly keep what you have. That sounds like a perfect cam for a 5.3.
Good enough for me! Thnx martin
Old 11-29-2013 | 04:27 PM
  #44  
S1LV3R's Avatar
TECH Regular

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 433
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Wicked69
FWIW-I am shocked the ebay turbo's always come up. I know some success but damn these ON3 70's flat out rock. The absolutely smoke the precision 62's I had. Not even close. I am not sure who has gone the fastest so far using the chinese turbo's but I would have to think that my 3720lb chevelle that has run 6.00@116.85mph has to be at least one of the fastest. I have put these things through the ringer at the drag strip and on the street. I drive an average of 300 miles a week. I take my kids to school and pick them up everyday unless the weather is just absolutley horrible. These turbo's have not missed a beat. They ran awesome on my 5.3 and on my current 6.0.

Hope my experience has helped. A set of the On3 70's as was mentioned with a stock 5.3 will easily net the hp you are looking for.
Do you have pics of your engine compartment?
Old 12-18-2013 | 08:12 PM
  #45  
rollwithit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HRHohio
This is not a "74mm" turbo in the classical sense. You're quoting the wrong spec.

By conventional naming this would be a "52mm" turbo (Compressor Inducer). Or also could be called a "52/58" turbo. (Compressor Inducer / Turbine Exducer).

I would suggest avoiding these for your setup based on compressor/turbine size.

Consider the On3 Performance 70mm turbos if you're looking for a budget twin setup:

On 3 Performance 70mm turbocharger T4 Camaro Firebird | eBay

People have had good results with these.
took your advice and ordered the 70mm on 3.
got one in today!
Old 12-18-2013 | 08:14 PM
  #46  
rollwithit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Wicked69
FWIW-I am shocked the ebay turbo's always come up. I know some success but damn these ON3 70's flat out rock. The absolutely smoke the precision 62's I had. Not even close. I am not sure who has gone the fastest so far using the chinese turbo's but I would have to think that my 3720lb chevelle that has run 6.00@116.85mph has to be at least one of the fastest. I have put these things through the ringer at the drag strip and on the street. I drive an average of 300 miles a week. I take my kids to school and pick them up everyday unless the weather is just absolutley horrible. These turbo's have not missed a beat. They ran awesome on my 5.3 and on my current 6.0.

Hope my experience has helped. A set of the On3 70's as was mentioned with a stock 5.3 will easily net the hp you are looking for.
went with the on 3 70mm. got one in today!
Old 12-18-2013 | 08:17 PM
  #47  
rollwithit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Martin@Tick
I can't wait to see you put that thing in the 5's at 3800lbs. Delbert. Glad that cam I did for you is working well in the new set-up.

For the OP, I'd specify something similar to this for a 5.3 with those turbos:

217/225 112+4
decided to go with on 3 70mm .68 a/r
how much for a cam with this set up?
Old 12-18-2013 | 08:51 PM
  #48  
KissMySSo1's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 494
Likes: 1
Default

Kind of misleading advertising the turbos as a GT45 considering a true GT45 is a much larger turbo
Old 12-18-2013 | 09:26 PM
  #49  
HRHohio's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 916
Likes: 5
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Originally Posted by rollwithit
took your advice and ordered the 70mm on 3.
got one in today!
Nice! I'm sure it will give you everything you're looking for in a nice compact size. And, I agree with Martin, run the cam you mentioned you had.

Now you need to change the name of the thread to "Twin ON3 70's" instead of "cam for twin GT45s"... and turn it into a build thread.

Keep us posted.
Old 12-22-2013 | 12:06 PM
  #50  
rollwithit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HRHohio
Nice! I'm sure it will give you everything you're looking for in a nice compact size. And, I agree with Martin, run the cam you mentioned you had.

Now you need to change the name of the thread to "Twin ON3 70's" instead of "cam for twin GT45s"... and turn it into a build thread.

Keep us posted.
hell yeah!



Quick Reply: cam for twin gt45s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 PM.