Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

4.5 liter Whipple build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2014, 08:10 PM
  #41  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Bondobird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Fresno, ca
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rise of the Phoenix
I'm looking forward to seeing the end product; both HP/TQ and ET's. I've always thought a Whipple supercharger on these LS engines would be very nice. Hopefully we will see more of these builds in the future. Good luck with everything OP.
Thanks man. Not sure how soon I can complete it but we will all see soon enough
Old 04-06-2014, 08:24 PM
  #42  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
T/A KID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

My close friend has a 408 ls engine with a 4.0 whipple. He makes 23lbs of boost pump gas 91 with meth injection and can daily drive it. It's in a 86 Chevy truck that weighs 4200lbs n has been 115 in the 1/8 n when the 60ft gets down will run 5s. Still lots left in blower speed, the 4.0 is rated at 2518 cfm which is around 1500hp capable. I plan to start up my custom whipple build this week, I'll make a thread soon
Old 04-06-2014, 08:36 PM
  #43  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

My 2.9 was over a year, the 4.0 is around 6 months old. The intercooler in the 2.9 is not good, but the 4.0 seemed good. The problem with the 4.0 was the fittings, they were undersized so they could not flow enough water to support my goals.

Kurt
Originally Posted by Bondobird
Kurt, when did you purchase your kit? I've only been back to Whipple for about a year(I was gone for a few years) and to my understanding, we have a new guy making out intercooler cores. I wonder if you have an older one. I'll talk to the guys on Monday to find out when we switched.
Old 04-06-2014, 09:09 PM
  #44  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Bondobird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Fresno, ca
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 427
My 2.9 was over a year, the 4.0 is around 6 months old. The intercooler in the 2.9 is not good, but the 4.0 seemed good. The problem with the 4.0 was the fittings, they were undersized so they could not flow enough water to support my goals.

Kurt
The 2.9 and the 4.0 use the same core. Only difference is the fitting location. We do drill out the 2.9 core for bigger fittings for the COPO's though. Just the bigger fittings make a huge difference. Maybe you should try that with the 4.0 core. That's what I will be doing
Old 04-06-2014, 09:34 PM
  #45  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Bondobird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Fresno, ca
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here's what my setup will look like. That's the 4.5 sandrail kit and that's the same 12 rib belt line
Old 04-06-2014, 09:36 PM
  #46  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Bondobird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Fresno, ca
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oh but I will be running the gt500 crusher inlet instead of that billet sandrail inlet.
Old 04-06-2014, 11:59 PM
  #47  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Bondobird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Fresno, ca
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Any motor mount plate recommendation? I would like to keep the trans in the stock location. Yes I am searching too. Just wondering what you know has been used with headers and keeping in stock location
Old 04-07-2014, 07:53 AM
  #48  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

My two cores are not the same, I changed the fittings before running the 4.0 as it failed flow testing for my power goals (1,000hp flywheel). The 2.9 core flows 5 gallons per minute at 10psi as delivered, it picked up to 5.8gpm@10psi after I changed the fittings to -12 (core is restriction). The 4.0 intercooler flowed 9.5gpm@10 psi as delivered, after changing the fittings to -12 it flowed 20gpm@10psi. 20 gpm will support 1,000hp if the core has the ability, that will be part of my dyno testing.

Kurt
Originally Posted by Bondobird
The 2.9 and the 4.0 use the same core. Only difference is the fitting location. We do drill out the 2.9 core for bigger fittings for the COPO's though. Just the bigger fittings make a huge difference. Maybe you should try that with the 4.0 core. That's what I will be doing
Attached Thumbnails 4.5 liter Whipple build-20140320_143534_resized.jpg   4.5 liter Whipple build-20131217_085232_resized.jpg  
Old 04-07-2014, 08:04 AM
  #49  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

For side motor mounts many people make mounts for your car. I use some purchased from Detroit Speed, but I don't think they make them. They fit the standard 3 bolt mount and you would need frame mounts for the 1st gen SB Camaro for your sub frame.


Kurt
Originally Posted by Bondobird
Any motor mount plate recommendation? I would like to keep the trans in the stock location. Yes I am searching too. Just wondering what you know has been used with headers and keeping in stock location
Old 04-07-2014, 08:28 AM
  #50  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Bondobird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Fresno, ca
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 427
My two cores are not the same, I changed the fittings before running the 4.0 as it failed flow testing for my power goals (1,000hp flywheel). The 2.9 core flows 5 gallons per minute at 10psi as delivered, it picked up to 5.8gpm@10psi after I changed the fittings to -12 (core is restriction). The 4.0 intercooler flowed 9.5gpm@10 psi as delivered, after changing the fittings to -12 it flowed 20gpm@10psi. 20 gpm will support 1,000hp if the core has the ability, that will be part of my dyno testing.

Kurt
Wow I didn't know the 2.9's were that restrictive. I guess the fittings coming down vertically instead strait in horizontally like the 4 liter makes a huge difference.
Old 04-07-2014, 09:53 AM
  #51  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

The fittings I fixed, it's the core that restricts the flow. Can you verify that the newer systems use the same core in the 2.9 and 4.0 as the 4.0 cores water flow is fine once it's modified.

Kurt
Originally Posted by Bondobird
Wow I didn't know the 2.9's were that restrictive. I guess the fittings coming down vertically instead strait in horizontally like the 4 liter makes a huge difference.
Old 04-08-2014, 01:09 AM
  #52  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Bondobird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Fresno, ca
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I really hope I don't have a problem keeping the IAT's down. That actually the main reason I'm running a 4.5 over a 2.9 front feed, so I don't work it too hard for the power I want. I will be tapping the core for -10 fittings to help too. What water pump are you using for the intercooler? I need a decent pump because I will be running a 5 gallon cell for ice on race day
Old 04-08-2014, 03:35 AM
  #53  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
Exidous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Under a rock
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

That pulley setup you have there 427, is pretty badass! If it weren't for the height of the charger I could actually fit that in my car. lol
Old 04-08-2014, 06:54 AM
  #54  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I think on the 'other' whipple thread there was talk about making the intercooler single pass. has anyone managed to do this yet with the sandrail kit?
Old 04-08-2014, 08:17 AM
  #55  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Bondobird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Fresno, ca
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was thinking of having a single pass made for my kit through our guy, but I think I'll keep it simple and run the kit as is because it should be efficient enough
Old 04-08-2014, 09:20 AM
  #56  
TECH Regular
 
Razor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SOFLO
Posts: 404
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Jabsco pump mounted in trunk. It's quiet and pushes water all the way to IC, through HX, and back to the trunk like a garden hose.

Old 04-08-2014, 02:39 PM
  #57  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Bondobird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Fresno, ca
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Razor
Jabsco pump mounted in trunk. It's quiet and pushes water all the way to IC, through HX, and back to the trunk like a garden hose.

What model are you using?
Old 04-08-2014, 03:02 PM
  #58  
TECH Regular
 
Razor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SOFLO
Posts: 404
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

http://www.anchorexpress.com/jabsco-...FVKDfgodh6oAJA
Old 04-08-2014, 04:20 PM
  #59  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I tapped my intercooler for -12 as the -8 stuff it comes with chokes the flow below 10GPM. I think -10 might have done it, but I need a 90 degree turn pretty quick so I went -12. I have a Meziere pump, it's the only pump I found that can run the GPM I need at the PSI required.
Did you find out if the 2.9 and 4.0 use the same core?


Kurt
Originally Posted by Bondobird
I really hope I don't have a problem keeping the IAT's down. That actually the main reason I'm running a 4.5 over a 2.9 front feed, so I don't work it too hard for the power I want. I will be tapping the core for -10 fittings to help too. What water pump are you using for the intercooler? I need a decent pump because I will be running a 5 gallon cell for ice on race day
Old 04-08-2014, 04:23 PM
  #60  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Thanks! It is almost 13 inches tall, but I kept everything else as tight as possible so it would fit in some cars with just a cowl hood. I am under 10 inches from the water pump mounting point to the front of the drive.

Kurt
Originally Posted by Exidous
That pulley setup you have there 427, is pretty badass! If it weren't for the height of the charger I could actually fit that in my car. lol


Quick Reply: 4.5 liter Whipple build



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 AM.