Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

static compression affect on turbo spool

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-2014, 10:26 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
thendawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default static compression affect on turbo spool

Im in the process of putting together parts to build my ls2 shortblock. Ive searched around but come up with alot of conflicting info. How much if any effect does static comp have on spool time? Im basically looking at the difference between 9.2:1 vs 10:1 scr. For what ots worth this will be with an m6 and running on e85.
Old 05-01-2014, 06:55 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Old Geezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 5,640
Received 70 Likes on 62 Posts

Default

On that fuel, I'd look real hard at the 10:1..
Gotta stay on top of the tune, tho.
At that ratio, off boost performance will be better, too.
Old 05-01-2014, 09:29 AM
  #3  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thendawg
Im in the process of putting together parts to build my ls2 shortblock. Ive searched around but come up with alot of conflicting info. How much if any effect does static comp have on spool time? Im basically looking at the difference between 9.2:1 vs 10:1 scr. For what ots worth this will be with an m6 and running on e85.
Higher compression should spool more quickly. IMO .8 compression points isn't going to make much of a difference either way. I went from 8.6:1 to 10:1... Throttle response and overall "snappieness" didn't change much in my case.
Old 05-01-2014, 10:06 AM
  #4  
I need a gauge for that
iTrader: (37)
 
Atomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 10,921
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Spool time is a complex thing, and a single point change in compression will not be noticeable one way or another.
Old 05-01-2014, 10:39 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Ryans99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OH & MI
Posts: 1,482
Received 74 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

E85 tends to help turbo's spool quicker as well. I went from 10:1 to 9.5:1 and noticed no difference in anything.
Old 05-01-2014, 10:47 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
9sectruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: jefferson city MO
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

10.9 comp here e85,
still on tr6 plugs and the engine is very responsive
Old 05-01-2014, 12:30 PM
  #7  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
thendawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sweet nice to know! Id honestly love to run 10:1 but this is a budget rebuild and Im kinda stuck on piston choices. I can go Wiseco, but the only 4.010 piston option puts me at 9.2:1 (this is even with some milling on the heads). I could go to the Autotec pistons (which would also save $75) and get 10:1, but it would be a 4032 piston, and Im a bit concerned with running a 4032 piston with boost. However, it will be on E85 and my goal is prob 700-750whp at the most, so Im still debating.
Old 05-01-2014, 03:36 PM
  #8  
TECH Apprentice
 
Bazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 332
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Higher compression should spool more quickly. IMO .8 compression points isn't going to make much of a difference either way. I went from 8.6:1 to 10:1... Throttle response and overall "snappieness" didn't change much in my case.
That is interesting, was the tune optimized with the change in compression?

I think quench has a big impact on response and snappiness if the tune is adjusted accordingly. I've seen a Viper V10 with more snap and response at 9.5:1 and with twin small GT35R's than the stock 10:1 motor - due to tight quench via custom fit pistons.
Old 05-01-2014, 05:02 PM
  #9  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thendawg
Sweet nice to know! Id honestly love to run 10:1 but this is a budget rebuild and Im kinda stuck on piston choices. I can go Wiseco, but the only 4.010 piston option puts me at 9.2:1 (this is even with some milling on the heads). I could go to the Autotec pistons (which would also save $75) and get 10:1, but it would be a 4032 piston, and Im a bit concerned with running a 4032 piston with boost. However, it will be on E85 and my goal is prob 700-750whp at the most, so Im still debating.
Go 9.2:1 then you'll be totally safe on either pump fuel or E85.
Old 05-02-2014, 12:48 AM
  #10  
Gingervitis Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
slow67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

It makes motor more powerful N/A (before boost) But it won't make it spool faster.
Old 05-02-2014, 04:25 AM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Heavy H.P.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Land Of Enchantment
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've always heard that it can effect spool time.
Old 05-02-2014, 07:14 AM
  #12  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
toytech93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: wilson,nc
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd choose the 2618 piston
Old 05-02-2014, 08:03 AM
  #13  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
rotary1307cc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 0
Received 120 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

Static is meh. Could have an 11:1 engine and have a big *** cam and a late IVC and get away with a ton
Old 05-02-2014, 10:19 AM
  #14  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bazman
That is interesting, was the tune optimized with the change in compression?

I think quench has a big impact on response and snappiness if the tune is adjusted accordingly. I've seen a Viper V10 with more snap and response at 9.5:1 and with twin small GT35R's than the stock 10:1 motor - due to tight quench via custom fit pistons.
Hard to say what optimized means exactly... If you mean running a larger cam geared towards the higher compression, then no. I don’t have a compression change only comparison, so I should probably of kept my pie hole shut. I changed too many things. (cam,heads,etc)

I’d think high static compression bleeding off cyl pressure with the cam would have a few negative side effects over a low compression turbo engine.

Higher duration shifts the power band up higher in the RPM range. This also usually requires more ign lead (counterproductive to power).

For all the OEM short blocks utilizing high compression (10:1+) and a larger cam to make things “snappy”. I’d think you’d be giving up an optimum peak torque and RPM range in boost… for a little out of boost performance. (bad trade IMO).

Ideally wouldn’t you want to…

1. Plot where you want peak torque and your redline for your specific engines top end/intake.
2. Pick a cam to match that RPM band with the least amount of overlap. (which will also allow you the least amount of ign lead)
3. Pick your fuel
4. Lastly pick your static compression based off the dynamic compression produced by the amount of boost you want to run and your chosen cam?

Last edited by Forcefed86; 05-02-2014 at 10:32 AM.
Old 05-02-2014, 12:18 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
smokeshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 6,687
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

^^ basically how it should be done.
Old 05-02-2014, 12:39 PM
  #16  
Gingervitis Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
slow67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Heavy H.P.
I've always heard that it can effect spool time.
In an automatic car it will make more RPM on the converter (while on the transbrake). More RPM = spool faster (as side effect of more RPM, not directly from the cr change).

More compression won't change how much air the motor ingests. More compression also puts more heat in the combustion cycle instead of out the exhaust (wasted). Same cfm, slightly lower EGTs = won't spool faster (at the same RPM).



Quick Reply: static compression affect on turbo spool



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 AM.