Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Ring gap?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2014, 02:55 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
ul-ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Lake County Ca
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Ring gap?

I have a low mileage lm7, im pretty sure he said it was around 8k miles on it. I was reading it is important to open up the ring gap on lower mileage motors. But I was wondering how big of a gap? Thanks for any help
Old 10-13-2014, 03:30 PM
  #2  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
transaminator99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Ruther Glen , Va
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if your staying n/a leave it alone ..if your going boost .028 top ring
Old 10-13-2014, 03:41 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
ul-ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Lake County Ca
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm going to be going boosted shooting for around 600whp
Old 10-14-2014, 12:56 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
ul-ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Lake County Ca
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so is .028 good for the top and stock botttom?
Old 10-14-2014, 01:43 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
2muchboostNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From what I understood you do not want to gap both rings to the same size as it creates flutter. Dont quote me on this but I believe the top ring should be gapped up to 0.025 and the bottom ring can be gapped a bit more. I wouldnt hold me to that but there are threads on here with real world data.

Last edited by 2muchboostNY; 10-15-2014 at 09:58 AM.
Old 10-14-2014, 01:53 PM
  #6  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

.006 x bore for top
.0064 X bore for bottom

Pretty standard and even overly "safe" for forced induction. So .022 and .024 is fine for a 5.3 IMO.

Last edited by Forcefed86; 10-14-2014 at 03:04 PM.
Old 10-14-2014, 02:39 PM
  #7  
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
denmah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,339
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

its hard to go wrong with 28 top and 24 bottom
Old 10-14-2014, 03:03 PM
  #8  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by denmah
its hard to go wrong with 28 top and 24 bottom
I'm lost, why would you gap the top larger than the bottom?




Straight from Weisco...

http://www.aa1car.com/library/ringendgap_wiseco.pdf

The gap on the second ring should always be larger than the top ring end gap, this will
help to reduce top ring flutter or lifting.
Other stuff I read says you don't need to worry about ring flutter unless your reving the engine over 8000 RPM... so who knows.

Last edited by Forcefed86; 10-14-2014 at 03:13 PM.
Old 10-15-2014, 12:34 PM
  #9  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
toytech93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: wilson,nc
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I read somewhere forged pistons can handle slightly tighter gaps .006 x bore. compared to hypereutectic pistons .0065 x bore. Anyone ever hear of this before ?
Old 10-15-2014, 02:22 PM
  #10  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
ul-ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Lake County Ca
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
.006 x bore for top
.0064 X bore for bottom

Pretty standard and even overly "safe" for forced induction. So .022 and .024 is fine for a 5.3 IMO.
so a .024 gap for the top and stock bottom would be a safe route?
Old 10-15-2014, 02:59 PM
  #11  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ul-ss
so a .024 gap for the top and stock bottom would be a safe route?
Not really. You want the bottom gapped wider than the top. (from what i read anyway) If you went .024 on top go .026 bottom. Though as many have proved doing otherwise isn't going to cause major issues.
Old 10-15-2014, 03:54 PM
  #12  
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
denmah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,339
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

i have always read opposite, this is why i dont touch the rings at all lol
Old 10-15-2014, 10:44 PM
  #13  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
soundengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 4,651
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I never re-gap rings....
I always put on new ones, and you set it by the manufacturer recommendations... every brand of rings has their own specs that they want to see for optimum performance and life.

its is always based on Bore size and type of power(NA/N20/FI)
Old 10-16-2014, 10:17 AM
  #14  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,596
Received 698 Likes on 439 Posts

Default

The rings in your engine are now perfectly worn to the bore.
First thing you need to do is disassemble it and measure the gaps.

Mine had 126k. The tops were .019" and the second was .028".

I opened the top to .024" to .025". I left the second alone.

The bottom ring is the oil ring. Leave them alone.

BTW, from everything I've read, the stock rings are excellent. Hard to beat them going aftermarket. They are also quite expensive to buy from GM. Another reason to re-use them.

Lastly, don't mix them up cyl to cyl.



Quick Reply: Ring gap?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51 AM.