LQ9 bent rods at 16psi/12*/11.5AFR
#1
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 31
From: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
LQ9 bent rods at 16psi/12*/11.5AFR
Took the car out for a drive at the usual 11psi/12* of timing and all went well. Hit the 6600 rev limiter but all was OK (I think). I then cranked the boost controller to 16psi and it felt real good but then heard a consistent tapping afterwards. Limped back home and took the pan off and found bent rods. No metal in the oil or filter at all, oil pressure was where it was before. These are the floating style rods - suppose to be stronger. I'm assuming I heard the pistons hitting the crank or block. Haven't got the the heads off yet, but wanted to get some input. I thought I was pretty safe with only 12* of timing but maybe 16psi is too much with 92 octane and 50/50 water injection.
Here's what the timing/boost/rpm curve looks like - tell me if its too aggressive for pump fuel:
RPM....BOOST PSI...TIMING...AFR
3962...0.1 ..............30........13.4
4141...1.4...............28........12.8
4252...2.4...............26.5......12.4
4465...4.3...............22.7......12.2
4531...5.0...............20.9......11.8
4725...7.7...............16.1......11.6
5062...12.8..............12.0......11.6
5229...16.0..............12.0......11.5
Max rpm on that pull was only 5300. I did pull 470lbs/hr of fuel on that run + an additional 10% meth/water. Did I just make too much power, deto, too much timing???
This is a 04 LQ9 with an LS6 cam and rings opened-up. I will try and get the heads off tonight. No debris on plugs at all.
Here's what the timing/boost/rpm curve looks like - tell me if its too aggressive for pump fuel:
RPM....BOOST PSI...TIMING...AFR
3962...0.1 ..............30........13.4
4141...1.4...............28........12.8
4252...2.4...............26.5......12.4
4465...4.3...............22.7......12.2
4531...5.0...............20.9......11.8
4725...7.7...............16.1......11.6
5062...12.8..............12.0......11.6
5229...16.0..............12.0......11.5
Max rpm on that pull was only 5300. I did pull 470lbs/hr of fuel on that run + an additional 10% meth/water. Did I just make too much power, deto, too much timing???
This is a 04 LQ9 with an LS6 cam and rings opened-up. I will try and get the heads off tonight. No debris on plugs at all.
Last edited by 69-chvl; 10-19-2014 at 09:06 PM.
#2
Typically, the lq9 is a higher compression than an lq4 in stock form. That being said, I think the boosted timing curve should be a little more conservative. Looks like youre running a total of roughly 30 degrees at 100kpa which seems a little high for an ls based engine. So if we started off high and you're pulling timing from there, it's going to be high everywhere. Seems to me you're on the ragged edge between the timing and boost and it caught up to you. Maybe a touch lean too. These ideas are just my opinion, but thats my take on what might have happened. Sorry to hear about the engine. Total bummer.
#5
I hydrolocked a cylinder once by leaving an injector open and it made the tapping noise once running like that, the bottom of the piston hitting the crank. Is there any blow by? It seems weird detonation could bend a rod, is there any way it hydrolocked? I have some spare gen 4 rods you can have to replace your bent ones from when I did mine, had to buy a complete set. Or clearance the bottom of the piston and run it as is
#6
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 31
From: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
I did datalog this run, that where I got the rpm/boost/timing/afr figures that I listed from. Fuel pressure never dipped and was where it supposed to be - 43psi base + the boost reference.
Took the heads off. Heads, pistons, bores, bearings are all PERFECT! No signs of distress at all. Probably 5 rods are bent. Engine ran fine with the bent rods.
If it wasnt for the noise I wouldn't of known there was an issue.
I've read plenty of posts where folks ran n/a timing up until say 7psi and then dumped it all. I should of paid closer attention to what fuel was being used. But being that everything looks perfect, I can only assume too much timing at peak tq maybe???
PS - cast pistons are strong huh
Took the heads off. Heads, pistons, bores, bearings are all PERFECT! No signs of distress at all. Probably 5 rods are bent. Engine ran fine with the bent rods.
If it wasnt for the noise I wouldn't of known there was an issue.
I've read plenty of posts where folks ran n/a timing up until say 7psi and then dumped it all. I should of paid closer attention to what fuel was being used. But being that everything looks perfect, I can only assume too much timing at peak tq maybe???
PS - cast pistons are strong huh
#7
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 31
From: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
I hydrolocked a cylinder once by leaving an injector open and it made the tapping noise once running like that, the bottom of the piston hitting the crank. Is there any blow by? It seems weird detonation could bend a rod, is there any way it hydrolocked? I have some spare gen 4 rods you can have to replace your bent ones from when I did mine, had to buy a complete set. Or clearance the bottom of the piston and run it as is
I'm going to replace all of them b/c the ones that dont appear to be bent just may be slightly. Is there a way to check for straightness? I'm wondering about the crank and the piston pins too.
Trending Topics
#9
Don't think it hydrolocked? I could see if one rod was bent but there's multiple rods bent in this case. No blow-by at all.
I'm going to replace all of them b/c the ones that dont appear to be bent just may be slightly. Is there a way to check for straightness? I'm wondering about the crank and the piston pins too.
I'm going to replace all of them b/c the ones that dont appear to be bent just may be slightly. Is there a way to check for straightness? I'm wondering about the crank and the piston pins too.
#12
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 31
From: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Its a 96 Stang, my guess is 3500 with me in it??
Not sure. Only on the rev limiter for .004 seconds, that's it. I would assume those things keep flowing or else the engine could really be damaged.
#14
The GM ECM cuts fuel on the limiter.
But then, we use two steps which is a low rpm limiter, and it cuts spark while we sit there bending rods, I mean building boost. :-)
Obviously a bit different load on the engine.
You sure it didn't boost spike?
Maybe some time prior?
I'm thinking maybe something happened on an earlier drive, like when you thought the oil pressure shifted a bit?
Maybe this drive just finished them off?
But then, we use two steps which is a low rpm limiter, and it cuts spark while we sit there bending rods, I mean building boost. :-)
Obviously a bit different load on the engine.
You sure it didn't boost spike?
Maybe some time prior?
I'm thinking maybe something happened on an earlier drive, like when you thought the oil pressure shifted a bit?
Maybe this drive just finished them off?
Last edited by RonSSNova; 10-20-2014 at 01:06 AM.
#15
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 31
From: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
The GM ECM cuts fuel on the limiter.
But then, we use two steps which is a low rpm limiter, and it cuts spark while we sit there bending rods, I mean building boost. :-)
Obviously a bit different load on the engine.
You sure it didn't boost spike?
Maybe some time prior?
I'm thinking maybe something happened on an earlier drive, like when you thought the oil pressure shifted a bit?
Maybe this drive just finished them off?
But then, we use two steps which is a low rpm limiter, and it cuts spark while we sit there bending rods, I mean building boost. :-)
Obviously a bit different load on the engine.
You sure it didn't boost spike?
Maybe some time prior?
I'm thinking maybe something happened on an earlier drive, like when you thought the oil pressure shifted a bit?
Maybe this drive just finished them off?
This was the last run where I think it happened:
#17
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 31
From: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Thanks for chiming in Hellbent. What would you limit boost to on pump fuel with this engine? Does this look like deto to you?
What I dont u/s is how guys with LQ4's which have apprx .5 less compression are running 16+ with pump fuel.
What I dont u/s is how guys with LQ4's which have apprx .5 less compression are running 16+ with pump fuel.
#18
Have you verified the timing is correct? That 0° is actually TDC? You can configure in the holley if you want the rev limit to cut fuel/spark or both, although I would think detonation would cause broken ring lands/speckling in the porcelain of the plugs/ check marks on the piston... Not bent rods, but I'm no geologist
#19
All bent on the same side of the engine...Strange.
As for 16#/alky. [We routinely run Buicks, [stock rods/pistons], pump 93, at 26#/alky.]
How is the fuel delivery plumbed?
Have you cut the treads off the plugs, and taken a close look down deep??
Reusing brgs that have been run in those rods is not what I'd do..Just sayin.
As for 16#/alky. [We routinely run Buicks, [stock rods/pistons], pump 93, at 26#/alky.]
How is the fuel delivery plumbed?
Have you cut the treads off the plugs, and taken a close look down deep??
Reusing brgs that have been run in those rods is not what I'd do..Just sayin.
#20
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 31
From: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Have you verified the timing is correct? That 0° is actually TDC? You can configure in the holley if you want the rev limit to cut fuel/spark or both, although I would think detonation would cause broken ring lands/speckling in the porcelain of the plugs/ check marks on the piston... Not bent rods, but I'm no geologist
Not sure how to check the timing. I had the spark-only cut engaged. Think I'll change it to soft. But, no signs of deto. everything looks perfect.
All bent on the same side of the engine...Strange.
As for 16#/alky. [We routinely run Buicks, [stock rods/pistons], pump 93, at 26#/alky.]
How is the fuel delivery plumbed?
Have you cut the treads off the plugs, and taken a close look down deep??
Reusing brgs that have been run in those rods is not what I'd do..Just sayin.
As for 16#/alky. [We routinely run Buicks, [stock rods/pistons], pump 93, at 26#/alky.]
How is the fuel delivery plumbed?
Have you cut the treads off the plugs, and taken a close look down deep??
Reusing brgs that have been run in those rods is not what I'd do..Just sayin.
Looks like the pass side are bent but ever so slighlty compared to the drivers side. -8 to fuel rails and -6 return, regulator after the rails, twin Holley fuel pump.
I looked at the plugs with a magnafying glass and it looks very clean.
At this point I can only assume too much timing at part throttle. Peak tq for an ls6 cam in a 6.0 is around 4500. At that rpm I had about 21* and 5psi.