Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

My car is a turd! - maybe not

Old 04-15-2015, 09:02 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default My car is a turd! - maybe not

So finally went to the track and got a couple of passes in before I got asked to leave for no cage.

1st run was 1.7/7.16/101.5/128.8 12ps, 12* of timing

2nd run was 2.0/7.35/104.88/11.0/132.6, 12psi, timing to 16*, disconnect meth inj, blew tires off.

Looked at the datalogs, everything looks good except I normally burn about ~460lb/hr of fuel farting around town. I could only burn around 370 lb/hr here. I had 1/4 of 93 octane, and I mixed in 5 gal of 110. I noticed right off the car idled bad. Could the race gas of did me in here??? Car ran otherwise really good and pulled nice and clean to the 6000 rpm shift points.

This is disappointing b/c the 5.3 I took out with a cheapy converter and 14psi ran 1.8/10.8/134. WTF????

I also think the converter is WAY too tight. With the old converter I used the most fuel in 3rd gear, now it 2nd gear. I'm getting an 1100-1200 drop from the 2-3rd shift. But with this converter I was still able to burn fuel, just couldnt do it tonight.

Last edited by 69-chvl; 04-17-2015 at 08:40 PM.
Old 04-15-2015, 09:35 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Hank Peabody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Abilene TX
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

I kind of had the same issue and put a heat gun on the header tubes and found out I had been running on 7 cylinders the whole time. Idled and drove great on 7 cylinders, you'd never know the difference other than the track numbers.
Old 04-15-2015, 11:03 PM
  #3  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,596
Received 698 Likes on 439 Posts

Default

Maybe that quiet exh bottled it up?
Old 04-16-2015, 06:53 AM
  #4  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
408GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: GA
Posts: 966
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

I had a similar scenario this past weekend. The car felt strong on the street, but when we were finally able to get it down the track it went a 2.0/7.45/102. We checked it with a heat gun and found a cool cylinder. We pulled the plug and it was all black, the wires were old and maybe bad. But the other night I did a compression test, and it was 120-5 lbs on all cylinders. We're going to degree the cam tonight and find out it it's retarded several degrees.
Old 04-16-2015, 07:28 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

I did a compression test the other day and was at 200lbs all the way around. I'll check though to make sure there all firing.

But - I'm missing about 90lb/hr of fuel consumption...that's like 150hp by my calculation at .6 BSFC.
Old 04-16-2015, 01:17 PM
  #6  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,848
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 69-chvl
So finally went to the track and got a couple of passes in before I got asked to leave for no cage.

1st run was 1.7/7.16/101.5/128.8 12ps, 12* of timing

2nd run was 2.0/7.35/104.88/11.0/132.6, 12psi, timing to 16*, disconnect meth inj, blew tires off.

Looked at the datalogs, everything looks good except I normally burn about ~460lb/hr of fuel farting around town. I could only burn around 370 lb/hr here. I had 1/4 of 93 octane, and I mixed in 5 gal of 110. I noticed right off the car idled bad. Could the race gas of did me in here??? Car ran otherwise really good and pulled nice and clean to the 6000 rpm shift points.

This is disappointing b/c the 5.3 I took out with a cheapy converter and 14psi ran 1.8/10.8/134. WTF????

I also think the converter is WAY too tight. With the old converter I used the most fuel in 3rd gear, now it 2nd gear. I'm getting an 1100-1200 drop from the 2-3rd shift. But with this converter I was still able to burn fuel, just couldnt do it tonight.
Sounds about right to me, I wouldn't be too discouraged. Look at MPH to judge power, not ET.

Basically 133 on 12lbs. (with a poor tune) Exh. could make a big diff too.
5.3 went 134 at 14lbs.

First problem I see is you added more octane and didn't up your boost. That combined with meth inj. and low timing was killing power. Make a pass with your DD at the track, then fill it up with C16 and make a pass. It will run much slower.

You went about your tuning backwards IMO. You added a bunch of octane and went right to timing. Timing is that last thing I adjust on a tune.

IMO leave your timing as is. Setup your meth inj to start spraying at 12lbs. Turn the boost up to 17 and I bet it's a whole new car. More power will add to converter slip and cause less of a drop on your shifts.

Quit babying it and turn up that boost ****!

Then go back and add timing. You'll need more than 2 passes, I'd do 1/8th mile until you get it worked out.


Last edited by Forcefed86; 04-16-2015 at 01:30 PM.
Old 04-16-2015, 01:30 PM
  #7  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
93camaro_zzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Diego, Ca.
Posts: 2,211
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Do you have a video of the runs? That would help a ton. Or a log?
Old 04-17-2015, 06:32 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Sounds about right to me, I wouldn't be too discouraged. Look at MPH to judge power, not ET.

Basically 133 on 12lbs. (with a poor tune) Exh. could make a big diff too.
5.3 went 134 at 14lbs.

First problem I see is you added more octane and didn't up your boost. That combined with meth inj. and low timing was killing power. Make a pass with your DD at the track, then fill it up with C16 and make a pass. It will run much slower.

You went about your tuning backwards IMO. You added a bunch of octane and went right to timing. Timing is that last thing I adjust on a tune.

IMO leave your timing as is. Setup your meth inj to start spraying at 12lbs. Turn the boost up to 17 and I bet it's a whole new car. More power will add to converter slip and cause less of a drop on your shifts.

Quit babying it and turn up that boost ****!

Then go back and add timing. You'll need more than 2 passes, I'd do 1/8th mile until you get it worked out.

Do you think the octane could of made a big difference in terms of performance (or lack of)? I had one 1/8 only run with 16psi, and it still only pulled 101 mph but I spun off the line and had to back off/on again.

I hear ya though, I ran close to the 5.3 with less boost, so that's a good thing. Looking through all the datalogs, I was actually closer to 11psi (11.3-ish). Seems like my manual boost controller is subject to weather conditions b/c all winter I was getting 12psi, and now that its warmer out I lost a little boost. AND, the 5.3 was actually 16psi for those track runs...for some reason I thought those runs were 14psi. There's my missing 100+hp LOL!

Do you guys think a 1200 rpm drop from 2-3rd is high? My other converter was much less - like maybe 700. Slip on this converter at 11psi was 5.5%.
Old 04-17-2015, 06:38 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 93camaro_zzz
Do you have a video of the runs? That would help a ton. Or a log?
I have both, vid's kinda suck
Old 04-17-2015, 08:17 AM
  #10  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,848
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 69-chvl
Do you think the octane could of made a big difference in terms of performance (or lack of)? I had one 1/8 only run with 16psi, and it still only pulled 101 mph but I spun off the line and had to back off/on again.

I hear ya though, I ran close to the 5.3 with less boost, so that's a good thing. Looking through all the datalogs, I was actually closer to 11psi (11.3-ish). Seems like my manual boost controller is subject to weather conditions b/c all winter I was getting 12psi, and now that its warmer out I lost a little boost. AND, the 5.3 was actually 16psi for those track runs...for some reason I thought those runs were 14psi. There's my missing 100+hp LOL!

Do you guys think a 1200 rpm drop from 2-3rd is high? My other converter was much less - like maybe 700. Slip on this converter at 11psi was 5.5%.
I think it could. 11lbs doesn’t require that much octane. Boost speeds up the burn/flame front, octane slows it down. Advancing timing starts that flame front sooner. (probably why you saw such drastic improvements adding 4*) Additional timing isn’t always good thing though. You’re lighting off the mixture before TDC which is pushing down on the piston while it’s still moving up. (wasted work, hard on parts) You want as little advance as necessary. So adding a ton of octane when it’s not needed and then advancing timing to compensate is not the best way to make power.

I’m not saying 12* of timing is ideal. I’m sure at 11lbs you should be around 16* (or more on that fuel mixture.) Need to go 1 degree at a time and see what the MPH does. I wouldn’t suggest 4* jumps… ever. Mixing fuel is also inconsistent. If you make a habit of it, leave yourself a big margin of error with the tune.

A 1200 drop isn’t bad, 900-1000 would be better IMO. What are you shifting at? Turn it up 15+lbs (maybe shift a bit higher) and it may be perfect.
Old 04-17-2015, 11:38 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
I think it could. 11lbs doesn’t require that much octane. Boost speeds up the burn/flame front, octane slows it down. Advancing timing starts that flame front sooner. (probably why you saw such drastic improvements adding 4*) Additional timing isn’t always good thing though. You’re lighting off the mixture before TDC which is pushing down on the piston while it’s still moving up. (wasted work, hard on parts) You want as little advance as necessary. So adding a ton of octane when it’s not needed and then advancing timing to compensate is not the best way to make power.

I’m not saying 12* of timing is ideal. I’m sure at 11lbs you should be around 16* (or more on that fuel mixture.) Need to go 1 degree at a time and see what the MPH does. I wouldn’t suggest 4* jumps… ever. Mixing fuel is also inconsistent. If you make a habit of it, leave yourself a big margin of error with the tune.

A 1200 drop isn’t bad, 900-1000 would be better IMO. What are you shifting at? Turn it up 15+lbs (maybe shift a bit higher) and it may be perfect.
I've been trying to shift at 6000-6100 rpms as I dont think the LS6 cam needs to spin more than that. 2-3rd goes from about 6100 to 4900 +/-. You can feel the engine lug a bit. But, this is at 11psi. But really, this is pretty much the boost I run all the time, just no place around here for more than that. I'm thinking of just having them loosen it a bit to match my actual use.
Old 04-17-2015, 11:58 AM
  #12  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,848
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 69-chvl
I've been trying to shift at 6000-6100 rpms as I dont think the LS6 cam needs to spin more than that. 2-3rd goes from about 6100 to 4900 +/-. You can feel the engine lug a bit. But, this is at 11psi. But really, this is pretty much the boost I run all the time, just no place around here for more than that. I'm thinking of just having them loosen it a bit to match my actual use.
6k is really low IMO. I'd give 6500 a shot. The cam may stop making power around 6k but it will carry it a bit over and give you less of a drop between shifts. Sure won't hurt anything with a pac1218 or better spring on it. I don't think a 1200rpm drop is worth a re-stall personally. Esp. if it's not a track car and you never plan to turn it up. (wish I had that much self control!)
Old 04-17-2015, 12:54 PM
  #13  
On The Tree
 
turboventura's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

To have that much drop at a low rpm that converter must be pretty tight. What converter and trans fluid are you using?
Old 04-17-2015, 01:16 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by turboventura
To have that much drop at a low rpm that converter must be pretty tight. What converter and trans fluid are you using?
PTC 9.5", using regular ATF
Old 04-17-2015, 02:34 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Monte4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MI
Posts: 1,159
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I was shifting at 65-6600 rpms and my converter was bringing me down to 4900 -/+. I hurried up and sent it back for a re-stall. This was with an F1A on 13lbs.
Old 04-17-2015, 03:48 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Monte4ever
I was shifting at 65-6600 rpms and my converter was bringing me down to 4900 -/+. I hurried up and sent it back for a re-stall. This was with an F1A on 13lbs.
Was the car a "turd"? lol!
Old 04-17-2015, 03:49 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Unrelated (or maybe related) - I guess at some point the 83mm turbine may start to become a restriction. Any idea at what point that becomes an issue?
Old 04-17-2015, 03:59 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Hank Peabody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Abilene TX
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Really not that turdly, 11psi and 3600# weight you cant expect much. That Monza I had was around 3200-3300# race weight I think, it had an LQ4 and the exact same turbo you have...was E85 and blow through though.

13# and stock cam 136mph Island 520whp Denmahs dyno
16# and 216/216 (TU0) cam 145mph Atco 590whp Denmahs dyno

With the stock cam it had a few busted ring lands, smoked like a chimney, but Im starting to think shitty pistons don't affect power that much.

Last edited by Hank Peabody; 04-17-2015 at 07:16 PM.
Old 04-17-2015, 04:03 PM
  #19  
Launching!
 
Torqueshaft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 234
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I take it that your runs were through the mufflers and with a air cleaner.

If so...You are leaving a lot on the table I think.

You have added cid which means more cfm in and out of the motor over the last combo all things being equal.

If you removed the bottle necks I think you would see a increase.

I guess it all depends on what you want.

If you are wanting to optimize it in the configuration you run on the street or are wanting to see what it will do in a "strip only" set up.
Old 04-17-2015, 04:04 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Hank Peabody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Abilene TX
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Haha 134mph in garage built hotrod, thats how fast the ZX11's were when they came out and I remember saying "they'll never have anything faster, this has to be the pinnacle"

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: My car is a turd! - maybe not



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 PM.