Procharger buddies please help . At a loss here.
Launching!
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 267
Likes: 14
From: Chicago
I am saying you do loose 3 square inch of area. That is a lot of area to loose. I think 3.5 inch or 4 inch piping would be ideal. 3.5 inch pipe would be the same area as the twins actually.
To match the area that was lost.
I am going with air to water, that will be in the same place as my twins. 800 cfm air to water twins.
The 4.5s are not bad either. They are not. I know they are only good for 800 rwhp though.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 75
From: Amsterdam Ny, the good part
ended up making 572, 574, 572 rwhp on 3 pulls . Running 11.8 afr to keep the engine together alone with 50 50 m1 and distilled water .
I added a fmic this winter, better catback , 3.4 to a 3.0 pulley , washer fluid to 50 50 m1 and water .
I added a fmic this winter, better catback , 3.4 to a 3.0 pulley , washer fluid to 50 50 m1 and water .
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 75
From: Amsterdam Ny, the good part
T56. I tell ya the car still isn't fast enough. Must be the way it puts down power. My bro heads cam car seems more nasty.
I brushed off the 572 number but then two days later he dynod a 13 grandsport auto car and make 360. So the dyno seems right on.
I brushed off the 572 number but then two days later he dynod a 13 grandsport auto car and make 360. So the dyno seems right on.
Those #'s seem on track for a stock head/cam/bottom end. Might be time for a blower cam in that thing and crack the 600 mark. 13#'s gain you 200+ hp vs the N/A power your motor would make.
