Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Fast 92 or 102 for boost?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2015, 03:37 PM
  #21  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
 
redbird555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pompano Beach FL
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DavidBoren
Ok. How about the more efficient an engine is before the boost kicks in, the more efficiently it will use the boost when it kicks in?

You can add better flowing heads and the boost will drop, but the power still goes up. Same with the higher flowing intake. Who cares if the boost number is lower as long as the power number is higher? If losing boost is that big of a deal to someone, they can always crank it right back up to where it was before adding a higher flowing intake/heads and make even more power. It's a win/win situation for the fast 102, either way.
I'm not saying it isnt, but a lot of people DONT see a dyno gain with a fast because of the boost loss hence why it gets a bad rap. I think its worth while. Heads are a whole different ball game because so much more changes.
Old 10-02-2015, 04:47 PM
  #22  
TECH Addict
 
DavidBoren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,189
Received 119 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

I think an ls6 intake will do you fine and it won't require any cowl modifications. I'm not sure how well the fast 102 intake fits, so I can't say one way or another about it working without cutting the cowl.



Quick Reply: Fast 92 or 102 for boost?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 AM.