Fast 92 or 102 for boost?
10-02-2015 | 04:37 PM
#21
Ok. How about the more efficient an engine is before the boost kicks in, the more efficiently it will use the boost when it kicks in?
You can add better flowing heads and the boost will drop, but the power still goes up. Same with the higher flowing intake. Who cares if the boost number is lower as long as the power number is higher? If losing boost is that big of a deal to someone, they can always crank it right back up to where it was before adding a higher flowing intake/heads and make even more power. It's a win/win situation for the fast 102, either way.
You can add better flowing heads and the boost will drop, but the power still goes up. Same with the higher flowing intake. Who cares if the boost number is lower as long as the power number is higher? If losing boost is that big of a deal to someone, they can always crank it right back up to where it was before adding a higher flowing intake/heads and make even more power. It's a win/win situation for the fast 102, either way.
10-02-2015 | 05:47 PM
#22
TECH Addict
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 119
From: Portland, Oregon
I think an ls6 intake will do you fine and it won't require any cowl modifications. I'm not sure how well the fast 102 intake fits, so I can't say one way or another about it working without cutting the cowl.