Head pulley size.
I would bet your problem lies in that intercooler. Those cheap china intercoolers are not made to flow any kind of CFM, regardless of their horsepower "rating". Without seeing the core, I can't tell if it's even a bar and plate. It could be a super-crappy tube and fin.
Also remember, if turbo guys say they have success with a cheapo intercooler, doesn't mean a blower car will. On a turbo car, if the intercooler is restrictive, the wastegate just stays closed longer and the turbo spins faster to overcome the restriction and create the desired boost in the manifold. If a blower car has a restriction, the user has to pulley it down to try to overcome that restriction. This creates more drive power loss and a lot of extra heat. A blower setup needs a very high-flow intercooler to make good power. Your best bet is to switch to a "vertical flow" or "top to bottom flow" intercooler. This style provides much more surface area for flow. A "horizontal" or "cross flow" intercooler is good for IATs, but has much less surface area for flow and therefore is much more restrictive.
If you look at the CFM rating on that intercooler (which is probably inflated to begin with), it flows 385 cfm with 1 psi restriction, and 635 cfm with 2 cfm. That restriction is not a linear curve, more exponential. So by the time you get to the 1700 CFM your blower flows, you are at an extremely high restriction.
I would bet your problem lies in that intercooler. Those cheap china intercoolers are not made to flow any kind of CFM, regardless of their horsepower "rating". Without seeing the core, I can't tell if it's even a bar and plate. It could be a super-crappy tube and fin.
Also remember, if turbo guys say they have success with a cheapo intercooler, doesn't mean a blower car will. On a turbo car, if the intercooler is restrictive, the wastegate just stays closed longer and the turbo spins faster to overcome the restriction and create the desired boost in the manifold. If a blower car has a restriction, the user has to pulley it down to try to overcome that restriction. This creates more drive power loss and a lot of extra heat. A blower setup needs a very high-flow intercooler to make good power. Your best bet is to switch to a "vertical flow" or "top to bottom flow" intercooler. This style provides much more surface area for flow. A "horizontal" or "cross flow" intercooler is good for IATs, but has much less surface area for flow and therefore is much more restrictive.
If you look at the CFM rating on that intercooler (which is probably inflated to begin with), it flows 385 cfm with 1 psi restriction, and 635 cfm with 2 cfm. That restriction is not a linear curve, more exponential. So by the time you get to the 1700 CFM your blower flows, you are at an extremely high restriction.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Mine is 27 x 4.5 = 121.5 sq inches.
In addition, it looks like that core has 5/16 or 3/8" tall cooling rows, and only 1/4" tall pressure rows, further reducing the amount of internal air flow area.
Mine is 27 x 4.5 = 121.5 sq inches.
In addition, it looks like that core has 5/16 or 3/8" tall cooling rows, and only 1/4" tall pressure rows, further reducing the amount of internal air flow area.
ATI ProCharger and Moser Sales 260 672-2076
PM's disabled, please e-mail me
E-mail: brutespeed@gmail.comob@brutespeed.com
https://brutespeed.com/ Link to website


Yes we did use the same intercooler on my Camaro. I know of two people though who have used this intercooler and had problems getting boost with them. It seems their quality control is not that good. One of the guys had a GTO and replaced the intercooler with a brand name one and picked up a boatload of boost. Bob
ATI ProCharger and Moser Sales 260 672-2076
PM's disabled, please e-mail me
E-mail: brutespeed@gmail.comob@brutespeed.com
https://brutespeed.com/ Link to website


Yes we did use the same intercooler on my Camaro. I know of two people though who have used this intercooler and had problems getting boost with them. It seems their quality control is not that good. One of the guys had a GTO and replaced the intercooler with a brand name one and picked up a boatload of boost. Bob

Yes we did use the same intercooler on my Camaro. I know of two people though who have used this intercooler and had problems getting boost with them. It seems their quality control is not that good. One of the guys had a GTO and replaced the intercooler with a brand name one and picked up a boatload of boost. Bob
ATI ProCharger and Moser Sales 260 672-2076
PM's disabled, please e-mail me
E-mail: brutespeed@gmail.comob@brutespeed.com
https://brutespeed.com/ Link to website

That is the standard 3 core intercooler, it is only rated for 825 hp.
Below are better intercoolers:
http://shop.brutespeed.com/ATI-AI045...AI045A-001.htm
ATI AI045A-001 Univ Air to Air I/C, 1300 HP (3.5" inlet/Outlet)
http://shop.brutespeed.com/ATI-AI006...to-Air-I-C.htm
ATI AI006A-001 Air to Air I/C, 1550 HP, 4.0" inlet/Outlet Opp Side
http://shop.brutespeed.com/ATI-AI006...Air-to-Air.htm
ATI AI006A-002 Air to Air I/C, 1550 HP, 4.0" inlet/Outlet Same Side
Let me know if you have any questions Steve. Thanks. Bob
ATI ProCharger and Moser Sales 260 672-2076
PM's disabled, please e-mail me
E-mail: brutespeed@gmail.comob@brutespeed.com
https://brutespeed.com/ Link to website

That is the standard 3 core intercooler, it is only rated for 825 hp.
Below are better intercoolers:
http://shop.brutespeed.com/ATI-AI045...AI045A-001.htm
ATI AI045A-001 Univ Air to Air I/C, 1300 HP (3.5" inlet/Outlet)
http://shop.brutespeed.com/ATI-AI006...to-Air-I-C.htm
ATI AI006A-001 Air to Air I/C, 1550 HP, 4.0" inlet/Outlet Opp Side
http://shop.brutespeed.com/ATI-AI006...Air-to-Air.htm
ATI AI006A-002 Air to Air I/C, 1550 HP, 4.0" inlet/Outlet Same Side
Let me know if you have any questions Steve. Thanks. Bob





