Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Diameter Transitioning, Hotside

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-2016 | 07:06 AM
  #1  
Shownomercy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Man-Crush Warning
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,168
Likes: 123
Default Diameter Transitioning, Hotside

Crossover is currently 3 inch, and wanna neck it down a foot before turbo to 2/2.5 stuff.

76gts T4 turbo, undivided flange

Poor choice?
Old 10-26-2016 | 07:07 AM
  #2  
svslow's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 15
From: Pittsboro, IN
Default

The 3" would be the poor choice here.
Old 10-26-2016 | 07:18 AM
  #3  
Shownomercy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Man-Crush Warning
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,168
Likes: 123
Default

Originally Posted by svslow
The 3" would be the poor choice here.
Its already there, seems to work just fine.
Old 10-26-2016 | 07:25 AM
  #4  
svslow's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 15
From: Pittsboro, IN
Default

Got any pics?
Old 10-26-2016 | 07:32 AM
  #5  
Shownomercy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Man-Crush Warning
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,168
Likes: 123
Default

Old 10-26-2016 | 07:48 AM
  #6  
svslow's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 15
From: Pittsboro, IN
Default

Where on that are you wanting to make it smaller?
Old 10-26-2016 | 07:51 AM
  #7  
Shownomercy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Man-Crush Warning
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,168
Likes: 123
Default

The single large section on right side. Would chop it, transition down, then run a 2.5/2 Vband to work up front to turbo
Old 10-26-2016 | 07:52 AM
  #8  
JoeNova's Avatar
Restricted User
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 7,194
Likes: 107
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Shownomercy
Its already there, seems to work just fine.
If it was fine, you wouldn't be wanting to reduce it.
Old 10-26-2016 | 07:59 AM
  #9  
Shownomercy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Man-Crush Warning
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,168
Likes: 123
Default

Originally Posted by JoeNova
If it was fine, you wouldn't be wanting to reduce it.
Long story short, caught a manhole cover with hotside and it bent/crimped a lot of the pipe after that vband. So redoing that part and figured 2.5/2 is easier to work with and route.
Old 10-27-2016 | 09:56 AM
  #10  
rpturbo's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,374
Likes: 202
From: A-Town, Ill side
Default

I wouldn't go to 2, maybe 2 1/4, but then again, I wouldn't do 3. I think either way, it all works, but I would think it will spool quicker with 2 1/4 -2 1/2. It's about velocity, just like a carb, bigger isn't always better, but that doesn't mean it wont work.

Depending on how long it's been together, and if you have any data logs, I would love to see some data once you change it.
Old 10-27-2016 | 06:50 PM
  #11  
chiaj144's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 483
Likes: 1
From: Usa
Default

Not sure I understand what you're wanting to do. What size of pipe do you have off the manifolds? I went 2" off manifolds to 14" of 3" and I start to see positive pressure at 1800 rpm.
Old 10-28-2016 | 09:52 AM
  #12  
RealQuick's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,970
Likes: 15
From: MA
Default

Sounds like he is redoing the 3" pipe that connects to the pipe in the pic. The pipe in the pic is the crossover where two 2.5" pipes merge into a single 3" pipe. From there, the 3" pipe on the crossover connects to a 3" up pipe with the T4 flange.

Since he is redoing the up pipe, I think he just wants to know if there is a better size to reduce down to before the T4 flange.

IMO, if it spools fast enough as is, then leave it. If it take a little time to spool up, reduc it down to 2.5". I would leave it at 3" personally, but I'd be interested in the results.

Jon



Quick Reply: Diameter Transitioning, Hotside



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 AM.