Making the switch.... Turbonetics to On3
I didnt find a 78mm so im using a 72 vs 70 for quick comparison. 2mm difference but a huge change in where your setup would land.
and this is just comparing compressor.
imagine what different exducer size, then turbine size then a/r size. numbers of wheels etc can do.
IMO I still think Borg Warner is the answer to all questions if you can fit one.
i know 2mm seems like a small difference but that could mean A LOT as far as performance / efficiency goes.
I didnt find a 78mm so im using a 72 vs 70 for quick comparison. 2mm difference but a huge change in where your setup would land.
and this is just comparing compressor.
imagine what different exducer size, then turbine size then a/r size. numbers of wheels etc can do.
what im saying is that there is a possibility that with 76 it actually put your setup right in the center island vs when you switch to a bigger compressor but you stepped off a few island so its not as efficiently matched. = more heat.
im not saying thats exactly what happened but thats the kind of thing that pops into my head for a comparison like this.
you guys are probably right, the design could be that much better(and for the price difference i hope it is) im just adding in food for thought lol
Last edited by LS325ci; Nov 15, 2016 at 02:30 PM. Reason: edit: does not.
My next build will likely get a China turbo because my HP goal will be Sub 1000whp and I'm cheap. With that said I just don't like that this turbo swap is being structured in a "Test" format. Because it's apples to oranges and should be treated as such. Then again it seems like everyone besides the OP is unaware of that.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
IMO if he keeps it as 7lbs... I'd want the smaller/faster spooling turbo.
Pretty sure I fart harder that 7lbs these days though.
In for results.

OP - if you move the inlet of the turbo to a cold air source it will drop charge temps a ton. That's a really poor place to have your inlet. For every degree you drop off you drop off inlet temp it drops like 3-5* of charge temps.
Last edited by Forcefed86; Nov 17, 2016 at 02:02 PM.
IMO if he keeps it as 7lbs... I'd want the smaller/faster spooling turbo.
Pretty sure I fart harder that 7lbs these days though.
In for results.

OP - if you move the inlet of the turbo to a cold air source it will drop charge temps a ton. That's a really poor place to have your inlet. For every degree you drop off you drop off inlet temp it drops like 3-5* of charge temps.
I had my old turbo way over 7 psi too, just not on the dyno that day because of time restrictions. I'm still kind of new to force induction. So I'm all for any pointers.
i built a hot side for my buddys Camaro it has a 5.3 with a isky triple 12 cam and a single on3 78/75 cast wheel turbo. at the track it leaves at 7 psi and goes to full boost in .80 of a second . logs showed 20.3 psi boost car ran 6.05 at 114 mph 1/8 mile and 9.44 at 140 mph 3550 lbs .
i think with a little more timing and a little more work on the launch it will go 9.20s at that boost. but in the spring we will try to max it out and see what it has left.
i built a hot side for my buddys Camaro it has a 5.3 with a isky triple 12 cam and a single on3 78/75 cast wheel turbo. at the track it leaves at 7 psi and goes to full boost in .80 of a second . logs showed 20.3 psi boost car ran 6.05 at 114 mph 1/8 mile and 9.44 at 140 mph 3550 lbs .
i think with a little more timing and a little more work on the launch it will go 9.20s at that boost. but in the spring we will try to max it out and see what it has left.
if so sounds like a blowby, how many miles did you have?
the other question is did you plumb the crank vent properly?






