Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Anyone using a single BW S369SXE ?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2016 | 08:55 AM
  #41  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,615
Likes: 1,883
From: Little Austin
Default

Given that Precision and Turbonetics are owned by the same company now, I suspect there will be quite a lot of overlap in design in their product lines.

Andrew
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2016 | 11:18 AM
  #42  
stevieturbo's Avatar
9 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,616
Likes: 185
From: Norn Iron
Default

It will certainly be interesting to see if their lineups change or new models are introduced.

Turbonetics warranty on Precision units would be a good thing lol
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2016 | 11:40 AM
  #43  
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,025
Likes: 952
From: No VA
Default

Originally Posted by rotary1307cc
It's a hell of a lot better match than the tc76 junk everyone puts on
That's what I was thinking... 68/78mm vs a 73/80mm turbine. And the 69mm wheel is rated at 105 lb/min.


Originally Posted by hellbents10
I had a hard time with one over 550rwhp on a 5.3. It would not make more then 12psi or so.
Curious... doesn't really make sense. Wastegate pinned?


Originally Posted by oscs
Yeah not real sure how a SX369 can't make more than 550whp... I've had S366's do that and more.
Originally Posted by oscs
Exactly. If you can't make 550whp with a SX369 you're not doing it right.
That's what I'm thinking, guys easily make 1400+ with twin 369's on 408/416ci, how can it not make even 650 on a 325ci?


Originally Posted by DBRODS
I swapped from a pair of Turbonetics Tseries Billet 7568s with .81AR to the Borg SXE 369s with 73mm turbine and 88AR. Power was down 200hp and spool went to crap. The netics would be all in at 4600rpm and the borgs werent all in till 6200. I swapped cams and changed stators a few times. I finally put the Turbonetics back on and power/spool was back. I later swapped to a pair of precisions and picked up over the netics. You couldn't pay me to try any of the SXE369s ever again. Testing was done up to 26psi. This was all done about 10 months ago.

Originally Posted by DBRODS
Its in a 4200# truck, no track times on the new setup. Its not legal for the track. With the netics its been low 10s at 143mph on 15psi with traction issues.
So twin 7568's made 800whp at 15psi (judging weight vs trap), but you're saying 6973's couldn't make 600whp at any psi? Something seems amiss since others are making well north of 1200 on the 6973's at mid 20's boost.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2016 | 12:13 PM
  #44  
hellbents10's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 4
From: Spring Lake, MI
Default

Don't remember the whole setup, maybe he had a small exh. housing. Switched to a good old S375 deal and picked up 12-13mph in a truck with the same wastegate spring though.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2016 | 03:09 PM
  #45  
94heritage's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 171
Likes: 9
Default

Over on performance trucks theres a guy that did a kb racing single kit with the 369 sxe and on 7 lbs of boost it did 470 to the tire. I would think it would be a kick *** instant power little turbo that could do north of 650 tire with the boost turned up.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2016 | 03:23 PM
  #46  
sbcgenII's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 2
From: Fort hood
Default

I have seen LiL John and Jose from forced inductions say that some of those new s300s are garbage. I think they said some of the exhaust wheels just don't work. Hopefully one of them will respond.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2016 | 03:27 PM
  #47  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,615
Likes: 1,883
From: Little Austin
Default

Originally Posted by 94heritage
Over on performance trucks theres a guy that did a kb racing single kit with the 369 sxe and on 7 lbs of boost it did 470 to the tire. I would think it would be a kick *** instant power little turbo that could do north of 650 tire with the boost turned up.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2016 | 03:48 PM
  #48  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,615
Likes: 1,883
From: Little Austin
Default

Different truck, but same kit and turbo. Seems to boost very quickly.


Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-5

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-9

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Dec 14, 2016 | 09:48 PM
  #49  
DBRODS's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 44
Default

Originally Posted by SLOW SEDAN
So twin 7568's made 800whp at 15psi (judging weight vs trap), but you're saying 6973's couldn't make 600whp at any psi? Something seems amiss since others are making well north of 1200 on the 6973's at mid 20's boost.
They made over 600. They were down almost 200hp compared to the Turbonetics 7568s at 26-28psi. Here are a few pics of why I'm positive they wont make the power. The compressor covers aern't machined enough to allow the volume of air needed. They will make the psi number but not move the volume. Here some pics from when I was playing musical turbos.












Reply
Old Dec 14, 2016 | 09:58 PM
  #50  
DBRODS's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 44
Default

Also had a guy from Cali that experienced the same issues I did. He swapped from a pair of ON3 76mm that made 1180whp at 28psi. The SXE 369s with 73mm turbines wouldn't make more than 970whp at the same 28psi setting. He went back to the ON3s.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2016 | 10:07 PM
  #51  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,615
Likes: 1,883
From: Little Austin
Default

I believe your experience. Can anyone provide a more technical answer? These look so promising on paper and I'm sure that BW doesn't pull compressor maps out of thin air, so they must flow. I was hoping to use one on a built 5.3L and run 20 psi, but now I'm having doubts.

Andrew
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2016 | 10:13 PM
  #52  
Forcefed86's Avatar
8 Second Club
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,483
Likes: 1,028
From: Wichita, KS
Default

Do you know what kind of pressure ratios you were running? Seems like the SXE line is designed to run at much higher ratios that the older line. Seems more suited to a small engine and a ton of pressure VS a large engine and a ton of Flow. They only flow 105lb/min at like 3:1 pressure ratios. Stick that turbo on a 2 liter and it will sing at 50 psi .
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2016 | 10:30 PM
  #53  
DBRODS's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 44
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Do you know what kind of pressure ratios you were running? Seems like the SXE line is designed to run at much higher ratios that the older line. Seems more suited to a small engine and a ton of pressure VS a large engine and a ton of Flow. They only flow 105lb/min at like 3:1 pressure ratios. Stick that turbo on a 2 liter and it will sing at 50 psi .
The one thing I don't monitor is back pressure. I do know that the Turbonetics above 28psi would take 3-4more psi on the dome to make another 1psi of boost. The SXE 369s at 28psi where still at a 1psi on the dome made another 1psi of boost. The Precision 6766s are still at 1psi on the dome to make 1psi of boost at 34psi.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2016 | 03:22 AM
  #54  
stevieturbo's Avatar
9 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,616
Likes: 185
From: Norn Iron
Default

Interesting stuff.

how deep/wide were the channel on each cover? BW do claim the sxe cover is a better than the older units. its hard to imagine them dropping a ball.

anyone have any details on Steve Morris provolute mods?
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2016 | 06:26 AM
  #55  
alocker's Avatar
10 Second Club
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 8
From: NW Chicago Burbs
Default

Originally Posted by Project GatTagO
I believe your experience. Can anyone provide a more technical answer? These look so promising on paper and I'm sure that BW doesn't pull compressor maps out of thin air, so they must flow. I was hoping to use one on a built 5.3L and run 20 psi, but now I'm having doubts.

Andrew
I agree, the maps look great but the pictures of the cover are interesting. The height in the gap is just as important as the width but it looks restrictive even compared to the standard S366. You would think the twin SXE's would at least make power.

Just for fun here is the spool characteristic of my 6.0 S475 compared to the truck above. I brake torqued it about the same amount of time and rolled into it.

Reply
Old Dec 15, 2016 | 06:53 AM
  #56  
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,025
Likes: 952
From: No VA
Default

Originally Posted by DBRODS
They made over 600. They were down almost 200hp compared to the Turbonetics 7568s at 26-28psi. Here are a few pics of why I'm positive they wont make the power. The compressor covers aern't machined enough to allow the volume of air needed. They will make the psi number but not move the volume. Here some pics from when I was playing musical turbos.
Gotcha that makes more sense. I think the 75mm compressors simply moved more air then a 69mm at 26-28psi but your 5.3 could still breath easily through two 68mm turbines and didn't realize the gain from going to a larger turbine?

I'm wondering if you kept turning up the boost what would happen? You ran 34psi with the Precisions why not the Borgs?
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2016 | 06:55 AM
  #57  
Forcefed86's Avatar
8 Second Club
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,483
Likes: 1,028
From: Wichita, KS
Default

Do the maps really look that great at the common pressure ratios used on LS engine in a twin config?
Attached Thumbnails Anyone using a single BW S369SXE ?!-69_compmap__.jpg  
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2016 | 07:03 AM
  #58  
stevieturbo's Avatar
9 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,616
Likes: 185
From: Norn Iron
Default

The cover on my 364FMW, which even uses the smaller cover as per 362



I'm sure the compressor wheels themselves are very good...but perhaps it is the cover that is letting them down.

Steve Morris modifies Procharger volutes which is supposed to release a good bit of power, and from videos of the work it looks like the work is concentrated in the outer areas mentioned here.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2016 | 07:19 AM
  #59  
svslow's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 28
From: Pittsboro, IN
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Do the maps really look that great at the common pressure ratios used on LS engine in a twin config?
This is likely the root of everyone's issues with them.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2016 | 08:17 AM
  #60  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,615
Likes: 1,883
From: Little Austin
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Do the maps really look that great at the common pressure ratios used on LS engine in a twin config?
Im looking at using a single on a 5.3L and building a torque monster. What concerned me are statements claiming that these turbos don't work at higher boost levels.

Andrew
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:07 PM.

story-0
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-2
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-5
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-6
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-7
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE