6.0 keeps breaking ringlands
Sorry to keep ya posting pics.
My experience is that due to the rowdy mixture when you first fire up and start tuning that the Wideband o2 used like the AEM or a LM1 uses it it good for maybe 2 new engines then its starting to fall way off on accuracy (I'm tuning NA motors with 15:1 compression usually so the life is really short.. ) Initial startups are usually pig fat on mixture.. Especially on a mechanical injected motor..
Used to have a actual gas analyser to go with the wide bands was an awesome combo but the manufacturer went belly up and the parts went away.. I miss that piece of junk some times..
My experience is that due to the rowdy mixture when you first fire up and start tuning that the Wideband o2 used like the AEM or a LM1 uses it it good for maybe 2 new engines then its starting to fall way off on accuracy (I'm tuning NA motors with 15:1 compression usually so the life is really short.. ) Initial startups are usually pig fat on mixture.. Especially on a mechanical injected motor..
Used to have a actual gas analyser to go with the wide bands was an awesome combo but the manufacturer went belly up and the parts went away.. I miss that piece of junk some times..
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Then learn what needs done to be safe..prior to blowing **** up ?
And no, most reputable tuners were doing it before laptops and widebands existed. The problem usually arises when it's "tuners" who think all they need is a laptop and wideband but no knowledge on the subject.
First blow up....ok...repair it and fix the problem.
But to do the exact same thing to another engine without fixing the cause...is just crazy. So ok...go for a 3rd engine..4th, but that's just silly really.
I'm all for people learning, but when they're saying their tune was good but they've blown up 2 engines already.....really, think about that for a second. That doesnt shout to me that someone actually is learning.
Whether that learning then comes from books or online, or perhaps from other sources, that is up to them of course. But how people then interpret any of that info can be another matter.
I did watch my dad melt down his turbo 2 stroke snowmobiles a few times though hahaha. Those are a bit finicky with carbs.
And no, most reputable tuners were doing it before laptops and widebands existed. The problem usually arises when it's "tuners" who think all they need is a laptop and wideband but no knowledge on the subject.
First blow up....ok...repair it and fix the problem.
But to do the exact same thing to another engine without fixing the cause...is just crazy. So ok...go for a 3rd engine..4th, but that's just silly really.
I'm all for people learning, but when they're saying their tune was good but they've blown up 2 engines already.....really, think about that for a second. That doesnt shout to me that someone actually is learning.
Whether that learning then comes from books or online, or perhaps from other sources, that is up to them of course. But how people then interpret any of that info can be another matter.
And i disagree with almost everything youve said in this thread. i do agree he needs to take a step back and really look at whats going, ask questions and get advice, but whats he going to learn by giving up and paying someone to tune it?
You can read all you want. You can be the smartest internet troll on this planet, but none of that means **** without experience and that means blowing **** up.
And i dont see the OP in here complaining that he is tired of swinging motors into his vehicle so i say keep on trying.






