Turbo log manifold for a silverado - LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion

Notices
Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Turbo log manifold for a silverado

Reply

Old 12-05-2017, 09:57 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
brandon6.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Glennville, GA.
Posts: 1,608
Default Turbo log manifold for a silverado

Hey I am thinking of building a diff setup for my truck. I currently have a fully divided 2.5" truck manifold forward hotside. Spool time currently is not the best. Underhood temps are pretty bad, and I'm tired of fighting piping etc. when reinstalling the kit.

So, my next step is to try my luck at building a turbo log manifold setup. I am planning on ordering all the parts in sch40 mild steel.

As for the header primary tube size I'm thinking of 1.5"
Log manifold main body 2.5"
Crossover 2" or 2.25"

This will all be going into a t6 s480 turbo. My questions are do u think the the sizes for the manifold will work ok? will 2.5" main log body work or should that be 3"? Maybe a lil bigger for crossover size?
brandon6.0 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 06:32 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
svslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 1,134
Default

I would get the new Holley log set up.

https://images.holley.com/8510hkr_v1.jpg
svslow is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 06:41 AM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 366
Default

listed sizes are good. i wouldnt go bigger.
TrendSetter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 08:42 AM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Waco,Tx
Posts: 124
Default

I’m interested in how much you’d have in it compared to a kbracing manifold.
4EyedTurd1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 10:47 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
brandon6.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Glennville, GA.
Posts: 1,608
Default

Well i priced it out and its around $200 in parts to build. Crossover another $120. Doesnt cost much. I got a mig welder and plasma cutter so shouldnt be to hard lol. Besides i like fab work.
brandon6.0 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 10:51 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
brandon6.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Glennville, GA.
Posts: 1,608
Default

Originally Posted by svslow View Post
I would get the new Holley log set up.

https://images.holley.com/8510hkr_v1.jpg
Not to big a fan of the holley setup. Want something simple tht works. Besides i dont run ac so i have plenty room to work with.
brandon6.0 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 10:59 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
 
svslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 1,134
Default

How could it be more simple than the Holley log?
svslow is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 11:10 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
kbracing96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sutherlin OR
Posts: 8,894
Default

I've build 100's of those logs. 2 1/2" crossover works well, 2 1/4" will give a tad faster spool time.
kbracing96 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 12:57 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Waco,Tx
Posts: 124
Default

Damn, that’s not bad. I’d build one for that price too. 1 exhaust manifold flange, 1 2.25 vband assembly, T4 flange, 2 2.5” 90’s,2.5” straight and 4 1.5” 45’s?
4EyedTurd1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 02:28 PM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 373
Default

KB log and make your own 2.25 crossover...
Suncc49 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 05:10 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
brandon6.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Glennville, GA.
Posts: 1,608
Default

well I'm shooting for the fastest spool time possible. This big s480 is crazy laggy with the 5.3, with the 6.0 it wasn't near as bad.

What about a 2" crossover? any hp to be sacrificed with it being that small? Just curious.

And I'm guessing the 2.5" is fine for the main body of the log manifold?
brandon6.0 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 05:11 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
brandon6.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Glennville, GA.
Posts: 1,608
Default

Originally Posted by Suncc49 View Post
KB log and make your own 2.25 crossover...
I would go that route but I just like fabbing stuff and making things work. I built my complete front mount setup 2 yrs ago.
brandon6.0 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 05:14 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
brandon6.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Glennville, GA.
Posts: 1,608
Default

Originally Posted by 4EyedTurd1 View Post
Damn, thats not bad. Id build one for that price too. 1 exhaust manifold flange, 1 2.25 vband assembly, T4 flange, 2 2.5 90s,2.5 straight and 4 1.5 45s?
Yea that seems to be about right. Same parts list I came up with.
brandon6.0 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 07:58 PM
  #14  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
baronsmith98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brunswick, GA
Posts: 832
Default

At what rpm do you start making boost Brandon?
baronsmith98 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 09:34 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
brandon6.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Glennville, GA.
Posts: 1,608
Default

I wanna say around 3600-3800 rpm. Don't have a log to look over.
brandon6.0 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 11:34 PM
  #16  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 3,822
Default

The kit I am currently running used primary tubes with ID of 1.5" and the manifold outlets are 1.875 (yup 1 7/8"). That's how the kit came. Spools lighthtning fast with a 7675 and 6.2L (0-8psi in 0.7 sec according to my logs), I have made 818rwhp @16psi with burnt plug wires. Should be close to 900rwhp if I could keep spark.

if I were building a new kit the primary tubes would be be 1.75" and 2.25 or 2.5" log based on my cubes and turbo.

for you, I think 1.5" and 2" is a good compromise.
RealQuick is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 02:43 AM
  #17  
On The Tree
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Waco,Tx
Posts: 124
Default

Where are you sourcing your material? I might build one for that orice
4EyedTurd1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 08:32 AM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
brandon6.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Glennville, GA.
Posts: 1,608
Default

Ace race parts and columbia mandrel bends.

I got to thinking last night for what it costs and the time involved to make these, kbracing is pretty decent on price. Not a bad idea to just buy one.
brandon6.0 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 08:51 AM
  #19  
Teching In
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 3
Default

Has anyone tried using a 3" sch. 40 for the log.
Hammerhead77 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 11:14 AM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
kbracing96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sutherlin OR
Posts: 8,894
Default

Originally Posted by Hammerhead77 View Post
Has anyone tried using a 3" sch. 40 for the log.
I built a couple back in the day for some big horsepower guys and T6. I really don't think it's necessary or helpful for anything less than 1200hp
kbracing96 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Turbo log manifold for a silverado


Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: