Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Turbo Camshaft help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-2018, 09:51 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
batmanntexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Sanford, NC
Posts: 17
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Turbo Camshaft help

I need some help from all you knowledgeable turbo folks out there. I need some advice on which of these three cams that I have, on hand, would be the best choice for a twin turbo build on my Avalanche.

Engine details: 383ci, ported 243 heads, forged bottom end, ported TBSS intake, ported 90mm TB, currently about 12:1 CR (will be lowering to 11:1 or so).
Turbo details: T3/T4 hybrid, 60mm, 1.15 A/R, journal bearings. I bought these off eBay about 14 years ago, they are still new in the box, so I figured I might as well put them to use.

Current cam in 383:
239/247/.629/.629 @112LSA

Cam option 1: stock GM LS9 cam (211/230/.558/.552 lift @122.5 LSA)

Cam option 2: 216/223/.556/.556 @114 LSA

My goal for this truck is daily driver duties & towing. Probably only looking to do about 8-10psi max.

So, I'm thinking the LS9 cam is the better choice, but I have no experience with turbo cam selection.

Thanks,
Scott
Old 09-18-2018, 11:05 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
truckdoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 6,330
Received 526 Likes on 356 Posts

Default

cam 2 looks pretty tasty.
Old 09-18-2018, 11:16 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
liketowork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Bloomingdale Ga
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The less overlap, the less of the boost that you are making will go out the exhaust before the valve closes. the ls9 cam of the 3 has less overlap
Old 09-19-2018, 06:46 AM
  #4  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

I'd pitch the 14 year old ebay turbos. Those things were still exploding 10 years ago. They have come a LONG way since then.
Old 09-19-2018, 03:27 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (47)
 
rpturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: A-Town, Ill side
Posts: 2,363
Received 196 Likes on 163 Posts

Default

I agree on the less overlap statement, however thats not the only thing to consider for cam selection. If it were mine, I also would pick the 2nd cam over the LS9.
Old 09-19-2018, 05:48 PM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

2nd cam for sure. The LS9 cam does not work too well with a turbo truck....the way wide LSA sort of kills off boost torque. But with the ported heads I would take advantage of the airflow above .550". I think buying a specific one for you r cubes and head flow would be a better idea. Just sell the 3 cams you currently have to help with the cost.
Old 09-19-2018, 09:28 PM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
batmanntexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Sanford, NC
Posts: 17
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the responses. I guess I'll try and sell the 2 that are on the shelf now (LS9 and 216/223) and order a custom one. Thanks again for the info/advice, I really appreciate it!

As for just ditching the eBay turbos to buy something else, can't see doing that since they are brand new. I'm not going to be pushing these things very hard, so I don't think they'll be blowing up on me.....and if they do......guess it'll be time to build a bigger, badder LS for the truck.

-Scott
Old 09-20-2018, 03:59 PM
  #8  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Oh yeah, use the turbos you have and see how it drives for sure.
Old 09-20-2018, 05:25 PM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
 
Bazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 332
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Cam # 2 is the pick of what you have for torque. Yes it could be improved on, but it will really wake the motor up at all normal driving rpms compared to the LS9 cam, and will wake it up significantly compared to the one you are now running at lower rpms and off boost. With a bit of advance on the intake to further boost low end torque I think you'd be pretty happy with it. That cam has zero overlap @ 050
Old 09-21-2018, 08:49 AM
  #10  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

I'd pick a different cam all together? 227/235 .600/.600 114+4... or so.
Old 09-21-2018, 09:37 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
sbcgenII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort hood
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Go with #2
Old 09-24-2018, 12:02 AM
  #12  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (8)
 
jmac636's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: huffman,tx
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

When those Turbo's start smoking I'd buy a couple Borg S366 turbo's or Vs Racing S366's. They sell them with T4 housings though.
Old 09-24-2018, 12:39 AM
  #13  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
gametech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockbridge GA
Posts: 4,074
Likes: 0
Received 433 Likes on 308 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion
I'd pick a different cam all together? 227/235 .600/.600 114+4... or so.
I am not intentionally picking on you, but I quoted your comment as an example. How the **** can anybody pick a cam without knowing any details of the heads? He said they were ported, but what do they flow? Where in the lift range do they flow? These questions need to be answered before a cam can be chosen. If he had stock parts the answer would be much easier to figure out.
Old 09-24-2018, 03:25 PM
  #14  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

They are ported 243s. They all fall within a general range. Had he LS3s or LS7s, it'd be different. Stock, not really. The I/E ratio stays about the same whether ported or unported.

You want to cam a twin turbo setup close to a usable NA cam usually. I usually recommend something like a 227/235 for most street driven vehicles with 243s. Being that it's a 383, he could go with a little more. But seeing that it's a truck, it's a decent compromise cam.
Old 09-25-2018, 12:51 AM
  #15  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
gametech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockbridge GA
Posts: 4,074
Likes: 0
Received 433 Likes on 308 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion
They are ported 243s. They all fall within a general range. Had he LS3s or LS7s, it'd be different. Stock, not really. The I/E ratio stays about the same whether ported or unported.

You want to cam a twin turbo setup close to a usable NA cam usually. I usually recommend something like a 227/235 for most street driven vehicles with 243s. Being that it's a 383, he could go with a little more. But seeing that it's a truck, it's a decent compromise cam.
Asked and answered. Fair enough.
Old 09-25-2018, 06:49 AM
  #16  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
batmanntexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Sanford, NC
Posts: 17
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

@JakeFusion - Thanks for the information and advice! I will definitely just get a custom camshaft rather than use any of the three that I currently own. Thanks again for all of the advice. I'll post back in here when I start the build process.

-Scott
Old 09-25-2018, 09:22 AM
  #17  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Kfxguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 4,078
Received 553 Likes on 429 Posts
Default

i do have a cam Id swap you for your smaller cam. I have a brian tooley 227/234 on a 113+2
works excellent with my single 7875 on a 5.7. spools almost instant. I just want something a little less rowdy. It would be perfect in a bigger motor like yours.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 AM.