Recommended 408ci compression
#41
Ok....so he has 1/2 a race car with 2 people owning it. Not sure how that correlates to a dd na car. Please splain.
If all this forum cares about is speed/power then i wouldn't be the only one saying 12:1 compression. Especially since he's in Taiwan and they have higher octane.
Some of you be dangerous if you were actually as smart as you thought you were.
If all this forum cares about is speed/power then i wouldn't be the only one saying 12:1 compression. Especially since he's in Taiwan and they have higher octane.
Some of you be dangerous if you were actually as smart as you thought you were.
#42
Don't forget that not everyone wants to hack up their car and spend money on chromoly this/that. All these 3200lb cars with driver are boring. You mean you can go faster with less weight???? Get something 3800+lbs moving is an entirely different game.
#43
But ya, weight is a bitch. lol
The following users liked this post:
SLOW SEDAN (02-27-2020)
#44
3800+ thats what Im talking about. I fully admit I don't sweat the weight and know it won't be optimized or run like it would if it was a feather weight. Just doesn't interest me to go hunting for a few lbs here and there to remove all in the name of performance. Rather play with power than weight.
#45
Btw i only have 3 chromoly pieces on my car.
Nothing hacked on my car at all. Have you ever seen it? How bout you ask the people who has before running your mouf.
Huh...more weight harder to get moving than less weight......really.....very odd. Then i guess weight reduction should be a part of every hotrod. Which makes me right again.
Yup....my blower car don't even have headers . It has 8.5 compression.....which is why i recommended more. To a guy that has better fuel than we do in north America. Go figure....no experience but yet has experience. Weird
Last edited by HioSSilver; 02-27-2020 at 08:49 AM.
#46
3800+ thats what Im talking about. I fully admit I don't sweat the weight and know it won't be optimized or run like it would if it was a feather weight. Just doesn't interest me to go hunting for a few lbs here and there to remove all in the name of performance. Rather play with power than weight.
The following users liked this post:
islander033 (02-27-2020)
#48
Well ya.
The following users liked this post:
islander033 (02-27-2020)
#50
Nope. Hiollary is that special.
8.5 compression, used stock cams, no head work and used the old heaton than some bum may or may not have tried to port. Then took ~5 years to get some sort of tune on it.
It likely makes less power than stock, good thing it's in a tin can fox or it really would be a turd. lol
8.5 compression, used stock cams, no head work and used the old heaton than some bum may or may not have tried to port. Then took ~5 years to get some sort of tune on it.
It likely makes less power than stock, good thing it's in a tin can fox or it really would be a turd. lol
#51
Nope. Hiollary is that special.
8.5 compression, used stock cams, no head work and used the old heaton than some bum may or may not have tried to port. Then took ~5 years to get some sort of tune on it.
It likely makes less power than stock, good thing it's in a tin can fox or it really would be a turd. lol
8.5 compression, used stock cams, no head work and used the old heaton than some bum may or may not have tried to port. Then took ~5 years to get some sort of tune on it.
It likely makes less power than stock, good thing it's in a tin can fox or it really would be a turd. lol
The following users liked this post:
islander033 (02-27-2020)
#52
Nope. Hiollary is that special.
8.5 compression, used stock cams, no head work and used the old heaton than some bum may or may not have tried to port. Then took ~5 years to get some sort of tune on it.
It likely makes less power than stock, good thing it's in a tin can fox or it really would be a turd. lol
8.5 compression, used stock cams, no head work and used the old heaton than some bum may or may not have tried to port. Then took ~5 years to get some sort of tune on it.
It likely makes less power than stock, good thing it's in a tin can fox or it really would be a turd. lol
It's really odd that you dumbasses like getting kicked in the head.
#54
So courageous. It must take a lot to come here and brag about how your high-effort setups are still slower than the minimum effort turbo stuff.
Everyone clap.
The following 2 users liked this post by AwesomeAuto:
islander033 (02-27-2020), SLOW SEDAN (02-27-2020)
#55
More lies man. You won't win any arguments lying. Neither of my cars are gutted. And yes they can run with some turbo set ups. Just look at dbuttsniper cars. Now his us way more complicated with not only h/c but boost.
#56
So the easy weight is using high dolla race brakes which reduce braking capability, aftermarket bumper supports and who knows what else. But probably aftermarket chromoly suspension.....and we know how dbuttsniper hated chromoly.
So swapping parts is hard for you?
No....it's not nuff said. You made a stupid reply as per usual.
Yes, it is nuff said.
yup....the engine was rebuilt back to stock. That's how i wanted it. Op in this thread wasn't rebuilding back to stock. Apparently you have a hard time comprehending.
LOL...only you would rebuild anything back to stock. Just buy a crate motor dumy.
Are you building the LS6 to stock too????
It's really odd that you dumbasses like getting kicked in the head.
So swapping parts is hard for you?
No....it's not nuff said. You made a stupid reply as per usual.
Yes, it is nuff said.
yup....the engine was rebuilt back to stock. That's how i wanted it. Op in this thread wasn't rebuilding back to stock. Apparently you have a hard time comprehending.
LOL...only you would rebuild anything back to stock. Just buy a crate motor dumy.
Are you building the LS6 to stock too????
It's really odd that you dumbasses like getting kicked in the head.
#57
Offered to do an engine dyno comparison with one of your glorified machine shop built overpriced N/A engines vs one of my bone stock truck engines with an $800 turbo setup across several categories.. Winner keeps the other's engine. I even offered you the massive advantage that you would win if my engine didn't win EVERY category. Then I offered to pay for the shipping of your engine since I was going to end up keeping it anyway. With your confidence and certainty, you had absolutely nothing to lose.
You bitched out. Plain and simple you bitched out.
Nobody cares that your N/A setups are ALMOST as fast. In the end, they are slower.
Stop trying to get a participation trophy.
The following 2 users liked this post by AwesomeAuto:
islander033 (02-27-2020), SLOW SEDAN (02-27-2020)
#58
You keep coming to this section to talk about how your gutted cars with engines that spent months and months at the machine shop aren't much slower than the turbo stuff.
So courageous. It must take a lot to come here and brag about how your high-effort setups are still slower than the minimum effort turbo stuff.
Everyone clap.
So courageous. It must take a lot to come here and brag about how your high-effort setups are still slower than the minimum effort turbo stuff.
Everyone clap.
The following users liked this post:
islander033 (02-27-2020)
#59
@LilJayV10 I believe you would enjoy this based on your response from the 500rwhp being "easy" comment
The following users liked this post:
LilJayV10 (02-27-2020)
#60
3800+ thats what Im talking about. I fully admit I don't sweat the weight and know it won't be optimized or run like it would if it was a feather weight. Just doesn't interest me to go hunting for a few lbs here and there to remove all in the name of performance. Rather play with power than weight.