Folks still butting rings on E85? (No IC) Or is that a thing of the past?
#1
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,067
Likes: 783
From: Wichita, KS
Folks still butting rings on E85? (No IC) Or is that a thing of the past?
Just curious how lazy I can be on small bore motors. I've run as tight as .021 on 26lbs (even accidently bumped 30ish lbs) with an IC and never butted a ring on the 3.78 bore stuff. Currently playing with a non intercooled setup. First motor is way down on power so I'm pulling it. I was overly cautious IMO with that motor and gapped it at .028. Really thinking I can get away with not gapping them at all... but curious what others have found. Basically just don't want to take the time/effort on a JY 5.3. I'v run a ton and never had an issue. I usually find them around .022ish or more on high mileage motors. So I just let it eat.
Aside form band wagon BS opinions with no experience... Has anyone actually butt a ring with a decent tune up on E85? Preferably non intercooled? I'm in a 2400lb race weight chassis with an 8.50 cage. It shouldn't take much to hit my cage cert. not interested in going faster. Twin 78/75 setup.
Please don't comment about pump gas or poor tune-up's. Or the fact that Holdner says I need to run .034 gap on a 4.8 to make it live. Not interested in those comments.
Thanks!
Aside form band wagon BS opinions with no experience... Has anyone actually butt a ring with a decent tune up on E85? Preferably non intercooled? I'm in a 2400lb race weight chassis with an 8.50 cage. It shouldn't take much to hit my cage cert. not interested in going faster. Twin 78/75 setup.
Please don't comment about pump gas or poor tune-up's. Or the fact that Holdner says I need to run .034 gap on a 4.8 to make it live. Not interested in those comments.
Thanks!
Last edited by Forcefed86; 04-30-2022 at 11:25 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by DBRODS:
swathdiver (05-01-2022), The BallSS (05-02-2022)
#3
Just curious how lazy I can be on small bore motors. I've run as tight as .021 on 26lbs (even accidently bumped 30ish lbs) with an IC and never butted a ring on the 3.78 bore stuff. Currently playing with a non intercooled setup. First motor is way down on power so I'm pulling it. I was overly cautious IMO with that motor and gapped it at .028. Really thinking I can get away with not gapping them at all... but curious what others have found. Basically just don't want to take the time/effort on a JY 5.3. I'v run a ton and never had an issue. I usually find them around .022ish or more on high mileage motors. So I just let it eat.
Aside form band wagon BS opinions with no experience... Has anyone actually butt a ring with a decent tune up on E85? Preferably non intercooled? I'm in a 2400lb race weight chassis with an 8.50 cage. It shouldn't take much to hit my cage cert. not interested in going faster. Twin 78/75 setup.
Please don't comment about pump gas or poor tune-up's. Or the fact that Holdner says I need to run .034 gap on a 4.8 to make it live. Not interested in those comments.
Thanks!
Aside form band wagon BS opinions with no experience... Has anyone actually butt a ring with a decent tune up on E85? Preferably non intercooled? I'm in a 2400lb race weight chassis with an 8.50 cage. It shouldn't take much to hit my cage cert. not interested in going faster. Twin 78/75 setup.
Please don't comment about pump gas or poor tune-up's. Or the fact that Holdner says I need to run .034 gap on a 4.8 to make it live. Not interested in those comments.
Thanks!
#4
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,067
Likes: 783
From: Wichita, KS
You must be really bored, as you already answered your own question when you said "I've run a ton and never had an issue". Unless you start doing endurance road racing or towing, I can't imagine why that would change now. Even then, I think most people gap rings as an extra precaution that they will never know whether is actually needed.
I'm seeing 230-240* IAT's at the 1/8th without an IC. VS 140-150ish IAT's with the intercooled stuff on similar boost. That is what had me concerned.
I also don't understand how GT55 clone guys are reporting such low IAT on big boost. (sub 160 at 30+lbs) Id think twin 78's would have less charge temp than a 107mm GT55 single. Maybe I'm wrong.
Last edited by Forcefed86; 04-30-2022 at 11:26 AM.
#5
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,067
Likes: 783
From: Wichita, KS
The following 2 users liked this post by Pro Stock John:
Forcefed86 (05-01-2022), The BallSS (05-02-2022)
#7
https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...l-i-think.html
Post #19
Kinda shocking, but there it is.
I'm not using an intercooler, either- I'll report back when it's tuned up and I have a few 100 miles on it.
Post #19
Kinda shocking, but there it is.
I'm not using an intercooler, either- I'll report back when it's tuned up and I have a few 100 miles on it.
Trending Topics
#8
It would be interesting to square up an old ring in the bore. Measure the gap.
Then heat the ring with a propane torch and see how much the gap closes up. Very crude test, but what the hell
Then heat the ring with a propane torch and see how much the gap closes up. Very crude test, but what the hell
The following 2 users liked this post by RonSSNova:
n2xlr8n66 (05-02-2022), The BallSS (05-02-2022)
#9
Would at least give you an idea, be a cool test too.
#10
https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...l-i-think.html
Post #19
Kinda shocking, but there it is.
I'm not using an intercooler, either- I'll report back when it's tuned up and I have a few 100 miles on it.
Post #19
Kinda shocking, but there it is.
I'm not using an intercooler, either- I'll report back when it's tuned up and I have a few 100 miles on it.
The difference being that this is NON intercooled VS all my past setups that were intercooled. I yanked a piston out of curiosity today .024 is snug and .023 loose. Think I'm going to let it eat. It may bite me, but at least then I'll know. Shouldn't take more than 20lbs to hit cage cert anyway.
I'm seeing 230-240* IAT's at the 1/8th without an IC. VS 140-150ish IAT's with the intercooled stuff on similar boost. That is what had me concerned.
I also don't understand how GT55 clone guys are reporting such low IAT on big boost. (sub 160 at 30+lbs) Id think twin 78's would have less charge temp than a 107mm GT55 single. Maybe I'm wrong.
I'm seeing 230-240* IAT's at the 1/8th without an IC. VS 140-150ish IAT's with the intercooled stuff on similar boost. That is what had me concerned.
I also don't understand how GT55 clone guys are reporting such low IAT on big boost. (sub 160 at 30+lbs) Id think twin 78's would have less charge temp than a 107mm GT55 single. Maybe I'm wrong.
The following users liked this post:
n2xlr8n66 (05-02-2022)
#11
#12
#13
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,067
Likes: 783
From: Wichita, KS
Putting 30+ to it isn't surprising to me. Would be if they ran no intercooler at that kinda boost w that gap though. Would have stopped me from being so paranoid anyway! I wimped out and gapped them at .028. I'm getting old and tired of pulling engines. Figure its one less thing to break. Rings were their usual nasty... took me about 40 mins per piston to clean them properly, get the carbon buildup out of the ringlands, gap, and reinstall. Could have gotten alot of other things done in 5 hours! But oh well.
On a side note does anyone smooth out the valve reliefs on the gen4 stuff? The edges seemed really sharp. I smoothed them out a bit.
Appreciate the input!
On a side note does anyone smooth out the valve reliefs on the gen4 stuff? The edges seemed really sharp. I smoothed them out a bit.
Appreciate the input!
#14
Putting 30+ to it isn't surprising to me. Would be if they ran no intercooler at that kinda boost w that gap though. Would have stopped me from being so paranoid anyway! I wimped out and gapped them at .028. I'm getting old and tired of pulling engines. Figure its one less thing to break. Rings were their usual nasty... took me about 40 mins per piston to clean them properly, get the carbon buildup out of the ringlands, gap, and reinstall. Could have gotten alot of other things done in 5 hours! But oh well.
On a side note does anyone smooth out the valve reliefs on the gen4 stuff? The edges seemed really sharp. I smoothed them out a bit.
Appreciate the input!
On a side note does anyone smooth out the valve reliefs on the gen4 stuff? The edges seemed really sharp. I smoothed them out a bit.
Appreciate the input!
#15
Putting 30+ to it isn't surprising to me. Would be if they ran no intercooler at that kinda boost w that gap though. Would have stopped me from being so paranoid anyway! I wimped out and gapped them at .028. I'm getting old and tired of pulling engines. Figure its one less thing to break. Rings were their usual nasty... took me about 40 mins per piston to clean them properly, get the carbon buildup out of the ringlands, gap, and reinstall. Could have gotten alot of other things done in 5 hours! But oh well.
On a side note does anyone smooth out the valve reliefs on the gen4 stuff? The edges seemed really sharp. I smoothed them out a bit.
Appreciate the input!
On a side note does anyone smooth out the valve reliefs on the gen4 stuff? The edges seemed really sharp. I smoothed them out a bit.
Appreciate the input!
The following users liked this post:
Forcefed86 (05-03-2022)
#16
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,067
Likes: 783
From: Wichita, KS
#17
Putting 30+ to it isn't surprising to me. Would be if they ran no intercooler at that kinda boost w that gap though. Would have stopped me from being so paranoid anyway! I wimped out and gapped them at .028. I'm getting old and tired of pulling engines. Figure its one less thing to break. Rings were their usual nasty... took me about 40 mins per piston to clean them properly, get the carbon buildup out of the ringlands, gap, and reinstall. Could have gotten alot of other things done in 5 hours! But oh well.
On a side note does anyone smooth out the valve reliefs on the gen4 stuff? The edges seemed really sharp. I smoothed them out a bit.
Appreciate the input!
On a side note does anyone smooth out the valve reliefs on the gen4 stuff? The edges seemed really sharp. I smoothed them out a bit.
Appreciate the input!