New times from M9
09-26-2004, 02:46 PM
#1
New times from M9 Had the car back out again after the repairs from the wheelstand incident 
Wheelie bars on this time
Only got to make 4 passes, as the quick 16 was cut short before the semi's by multiple spills late in the evening.
Slips are still in the car at the shop, so I'll and the details to each run later when i get the slips.
First pass off the trailer, same setup as the wheel stand at Norwalk except w/ the bars this time
Netted an 8.73@159.88
http://stenodracing.com/M9/873_159.wmv
After some coaching from Kevin Patterson on setting the bar height, we raised them up and tweaked the front shocks just a touch. Big thanks for the help!!
That pass got me
8.527@162.89
http://stenodracing.com/M9/852_162.wmv
We left the bars and suspension alone after that as we were running the quick 16 eliminations at that point and really didn't have time to tweak. And it seemed to be working.
Third pass was a slightly weaker launch, and short shifted a little.
No video on that pass, but from memory:
8.7x@161
Fourth pass. Got on the T-brake a little quicker and had a better launch, back into the 1.35 60' range. Shifted where i'm suppose to as well
Backed up the 2nd run with..
8.581@162.98
http://stenodracing.com/M9/858_162.wmv
Not to mention a NEW BEST for Taner in the other lane!! 9.49@144 in a friggin 6 SPEED. Big props on that one
Not too bad for a little motor w/ a stock crank
I can't wait for thunder!!
Wheelie bars on this time
Only got to make 4 passes, as the quick 16 was cut short before the semi's by multiple spills late in the evening.
Slips are still in the car at the shop, so I'll and the details to each run later when i get the slips.
First pass off the trailer, same setup as the wheel stand at Norwalk except w/ the bars this time
Netted an 8.73@159.88
http://stenodracing.com/M9/873_159.wmv
After some coaching from Kevin Patterson on setting the bar height, we raised them up and tweaked the front shocks just a touch. Big thanks for the help!!
That pass got me
8.527@162.89
http://stenodracing.com/M9/852_162.wmv
We left the bars and suspension alone after that as we were running the quick 16 eliminations at that point and really didn't have time to tweak. And it seemed to be working.
Third pass was a slightly weaker launch, and short shifted a little.
No video on that pass, but from memory:
8.7x@161
Fourth pass. Got on the T-brake a little quicker and had a better launch, back into the 1.35 60' range. Shifted where i'm suppose to as well
Backed up the 2nd run with..
8.581@162.98
http://stenodracing.com/M9/858_162.wmv
Not to mention a NEW BEST for Taner in the other lane!! 9.49@144 in a friggin 6 SPEED. Big props on that one
Not too bad for a little motor w/ a stock crank
I can't wait for thunder!!
Last edited by y2khawk; 10-01-2004 at 03:28 PM.
Trending Topics
09-26-2004, 03:19 PM
#8
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (-1)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rochester Hills Michigan
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How come you guys never are around in those cars? 
I live in waterford and rochester hills and I never see twin turbo SS's or big single firehawks ANYWHERE 
I live in waterford and rochester hills and I never see twin turbo SS's or big single firehawks ANYWHERE
09-26-2004, 03:29 PM
#9
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fall River, MA
Posts: 3,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ohhiitznik
How come you guys never are around in those cars? I live in waterford and rochester hills and I never see twin turbo SS's or big single firehawks ANYWHERE
I live in waterford and rochester hills and I never see twin turbo SS's or big single firehawks ANYWHERE thats cause he has twin turbos not single
