New Dyno #'s
11-04-2004, 06:57 AM
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Columbus,Ohio
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
New Dyno #'s Put my car on the dyno last night hoping to make 500whp. I made 501whp and 368wtq. that was at 7.6 lbs and 11.8 air fuel. This is with stock cam and exhaust manifolds with stock y pipe and cats. 
11-04-2004, 12:06 PM
#5
10 Second Club
iTrader: (80)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Reynoldsburg, Ohio
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice nice nice 
You gonna make Edgewater with us on the 20th? If so or if not, is the offer to borrow your slicks still up? I have a cocky sprayed C5 to show some buslengths
You gonna make Edgewater with us on the 20th? If so or if not, is the offer to borrow your slicks still up? I have a cocky sprayed C5 to show some buslengths
Trending Topics
11-04-2004, 04:44 PM
#8
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Columbus,Ohio
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dynojet dyno. Only mods are Borla catback,Weiland intake, centerforce clutch, stock heads, cam, manifolds, and cats.No ported throttle body or MAF housing. Also the pulley size is a 3.55 and stock ati crank pulley i will try and post the graph later.Also the car was tuned by bill from COFBA using hp tuners the max timing is 23 degrees.
11-04-2004, 07:04 PM
#9
10 Second Club
iTrader: (80)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Reynoldsburg, Ohio
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by smokinHawk
Sam said on the dayton board that your car should be faster but he still was going to own you or something like that.
The last pass where the washer owned itself, the 1/8 was 7.00@98.7, and it ran 11.20@120 because of boost loss. That pass 100% could have been 10.90s@127-128ish (possibly better?). He has what on me again?
My car made the above times on a 5-rib belt, 10:1 AF, mid 1.6 60's, and only shifting at 6200 RPMs. Edgewater will see an improvement with a titanium aircraft washer, ET Streets, and possibly no front sway bar. Also, it will be shifting at 6500 RPMs.
He'd better bring that 300 shot and new tranny if he wants to even stay close.
Now, as for BLWNZ. Some of you doubters I think are jealous, thus the bashing him or disbelief. I happen to know Brad and his car, and yes, his car did put down those numbers with that boost and those mods. The PMs and public bashing is un-necessary, and downright childish. Do some of you have small-***** syndrome? Is it possible someone actually could put down those numbers with what's listed?
I've seen the **** in person, Billiumss did the tuning and saw it in person, and the car gets around. Some of you need to rethink your strategy and maybe open up your narrow-minds to the possbility maybe someone is making what they say. On top of that, I will be scanning and hosting Brad's dyno graph in a day or so.
But I don't think that matters, some of you will probably call BS and claim it's Photoshopped to protect "what you know", or in this case, what you think you know.
11-04-2004, 07:15 PM
#10
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Columbus,Ohio
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DarkFormula
Jonathan, my car went 11.17@125 w/ the 1/8 mile being a 7.21@97. This is a 28mph increase on the back stretch.
The last pass where the washer owned itself, the 1/8 was 7.00@98.7, and it ran 11.20@120 because of boost loss. That pass 100% could have been 10.90s@127-128ish (possibly better?). He has what on me again?
My car made the above times on a 5-rib belt, 10:1 AF, mid 1.6 60's, and only shifting at 6200 RPMs. Edgewater will see an improvement with a titanium aircraft washer, ET Streets, and possibly no front sway bar. Also, it will be shifting at 6500 RPMs.
He'd better bring that 300 shot and new tranny if he wants to even stay close.
Now, as for BLWNZ. Some of you doubters I think are jealous, thus the bashing him or disbelief. I happen to know Brad and his car, and yes, his car did put down those numbers with that boost and those mods. The PMs and public bashing is un-necessary, and downright childish. Do some of you have small-***** syndrome? Is it possible someone actually could put down those numbers with what's listed?
I've seen the **** in person, Billiumss did the tuning and saw it in person, and the car gets around. Some of you need to rethink your strategy and maybe open up your narrow-minds to the possbility maybe someone is making what they say. On top of that, I will be scanning and hosting Brad's dyno graph in a day or so.
But I don't think that matters, some of you will probably call BS and claim it's Photoshopped to protect "what you know", or in this case, what you think you know.
The last pass where the washer owned itself, the 1/8 was 7.00@98.7, and it ran 11.20@120 because of boost loss. That pass 100% could have been 10.90s@127-128ish (possibly better?). He has what on me again?
My car made the above times on a 5-rib belt, 10:1 AF, mid 1.6 60's, and only shifting at 6200 RPMs. Edgewater will see an improvement with a titanium aircraft washer, ET Streets, and possibly no front sway bar. Also, it will be shifting at 6500 RPMs.
He'd better bring that 300 shot and new tranny if he wants to even stay close.
Now, as for BLWNZ. Some of you doubters I think are jealous, thus the bashing him or disbelief. I happen to know Brad and his car, and yes, his car did put down those numbers with that boost and those mods. The PMs and public bashing is un-necessary, and downright childish. Do some of you have small-***** syndrome? Is it possible someone actually could put down those numbers with what's listed?
I've seen the **** in person, Billiumss did the tuning and saw it in person, and the car gets around. Some of you need to rethink your strategy and maybe open up your narrow-minds to the possbility maybe someone is making what they say. On top of that, I will be scanning and hosting Brad's dyno graph in a day or so.
But I don't think that matters, some of you will probably call BS and claim it's Photoshopped to protect "what you know", or in this case, what you think you know.
11-05-2004, 08:32 AM
#16
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Columbus,Ohio
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by WHPLASH
Here's mine.
424 rwhp
383 rwtq
@ 7.6lbs
Mustang Dyno
All performance mods in sig
77 More rwhp and no exhaust mods. Thats too impressive. But congrats
424 rwhp
383 rwtq
@ 7.6lbs
Mustang Dyno
All performance mods in sig
77 More rwhp and no exhaust mods. Thats too impressive. But congrats
I also get the same thing with my vw it is a 2.8 and makes 380Whp on 16lbs and only ways 2900 lbs. but i guess everyone can have an opinion.
11-05-2004, 10:30 AM
#17
