Results are in!!! DYNO SHEET HERE!!!! COME IN!!!
Predator03 is the coolest guy ever. LS1 power, we have 11 more pounds of boost to go, do you think we could squeeeze another 100 hp out of it to match his 03Cobra blower motor?
You are retarded. Your car is going to make more power under the torque peak, you have a twin screw supercharger. these guys are running centrifigals, make more peak power and are more effecient up to. How fast has your mid 600 hp car been? Your seem to be a tool who understands nothing about the internal combustion engine or power. Correct me if Im wrong. How much boost were you pushing to make 500 rwhp with your motor built for boost?
This guy isnt a tool, hes the whole fricken toolbox. Where is the limp hand and roll eyes smiley.
You are retarded. Your car is going to make more power under the torque peak, you have a twin screw supercharger. these guys are running centrifigals, make more peak power and are more effecient up to. How fast has your mid 600 hp car been? Your seem to be a tool who understands nothing about the internal combustion engine or power. Correct me if Im wrong. How much boost were you pushing to make 500 rwhp with your motor built for boost?
This guy isnt a tool, hes the whole fricken toolbox. Where is the limp hand and roll eyes smiley.
osuhuntero7- damn long name, anyway very nice results, almost convincing me to avoid the lure of the turbo kits... So many ppl have seen either the high side of the Centri SCs power or the belt slipping/boost creeping/bracket flexing low side. Glad to see SDCE is making a badddasssss setup to go with the ATI's. Will be interesting to see how it works out with a built engine and more boost too. Good luck.
OT-I didnt see anything really requiring bashing Predators post. He complimented one setup. And also being he is twice screwed, may not be in the know on the fact that his setup will pull the power band to the left, and more flatline it than the Centri SC that make power in the higher rpm side of the band. Maybe his ingnorance is his bliss, but doesnt require all the bad mouthing.
Charlie
OT-I didnt see anything really requiring bashing Predators post. He complimented one setup. And also being he is twice screwed, may not be in the know on the fact that his setup will pull the power band to the left, and more flatline it than the Centri SC that make power in the higher rpm side of the band. Maybe his ingnorance is his bliss, but doesnt require all the bad mouthing.
Charlie
Originally Posted by CAT3
OT-I didnt see anything really requiring bashing Predators post. He complimented one setup. And also being he is twice screwed, may not be in the know on the fact that his setup will pull the power band to the left, and more flatline it than the Centri SC that make power in the higher rpm side of the band. Maybe his ingnorance is his bliss, but doesnt require all the bad mouthing.
Charlie
Charlie
Last edited by LSs1Power; Jan 12, 2005 at 12:32 AM.
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
From: F.H,Waterford,Port Huron, MI
Not trying to be a *** hole but is it just me or are all these Supercharged LS1 numbers low. I mean the average is what 400-500hp? If I spend that money I want at least 100hp more. Stock motor Incon Twin Turbo I made 520hp and 590tq.
Again I say this not to be a *** but I don't understand. I mean I know there is a problem with the pulleys..... It seems that is costs more and makes less. is there something I missed? Is there a reason the supercharger is better even with lower power numbers?
Again I say this not to be a *** but I don't understand. I mean I know there is a problem with the pulleys..... It seems that is costs more and makes less. is there something I missed? Is there a reason the supercharger is better even with lower power numbers?
Originally Posted by 2FAST4U
Not trying to be a *** hole but is it just me or are all these Supercharged LS1 numbers low. I mean the average is what 400-500hp? If I spend that money I want at least 100hp more. Stock motor Incon Twin Turbo I made 520hp and 590tq.
Again I say this not to be a *** but I don't understand. I mean I know there is a problem with the pulleys..... It seems that is costs more and makes less. is there something I missed? Is there a reason the supercharger is better even with lower power numbers?
Again I say this not to be a *** but I don't understand. I mean I know there is a problem with the pulleys..... It seems that is costs more and makes less. is there something I missed? Is there a reason the supercharger is better even with lower power numbers?
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
From: F.H,Waterford,Port Huron, MI
See that sounds much better! But I always hear of SuperCharger problems, Mostly pulley but also brackets and maf. As well as the higher cost of the supercharger vs. the Turbo.
Sorry not trying to highjack the thread......
Sorry not trying to highjack the thread......
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Originally Posted by 2FAST4U
See that sounds much better! But I always hear of SuperCharger problems, Mostly pulley but also brackets and maf. As well as the higher cost of the supercharger vs. the Turbo.
Sorry not trying to highjack the thread......
Sorry not trying to highjack the thread......
Originally Posted by 2FAST4U
Not trying to be a *** hole but is it just me or are all these Supercharged LS1 numbers low. I mean the average is what 400-500hp? If I spend that money I want at least 100hp more. Stock motor Incon Twin Turbo I made 520hp and 590tq.
Again I say this not to be a *** but I don't understand. I mean I know there is a problem with the pulleys..... It seems that is costs more and makes less. is there something I missed? Is there a reason the supercharger is better even with lower power numbers?
Again I say this not to be a *** but I don't understand. I mean I know there is a problem with the pulleys..... It seems that is costs more and makes less. is there something I missed? Is there a reason the supercharger is better even with lower power numbers?
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
From: F.H,Waterford,Port Huron, MI
Well the Incon was way more than that but a TTI kit is like $3800 or $4200 with injectors and everything! right It has been a long time like 2 year? And with a turbo kit you don't need headers.
----Again a am not trying to be a dick just asking!----
--Hell could be wrong--
And boost is only a number. Air temp,flow, and power numbers matter more.
But I had the Incon kit (with much smaller different turbos) on a stock motor LS1. Boost was 10psi and 520rwhp. that is alot for a bolt on power adder on 94 pump gas. As harlan said "the Incons with the gates wired close only go to 12.5psi and in the upper RMP spike fast to 16psi but then right back down".
I just know of a few people personaly and some on LS1TECH that had lots of problems. But I am glad to hear they are fixed.
----Again a am not trying to be a dick just asking!----
--Hell could be wrong--
And boost is only a number. Air temp,flow, and power numbers matter more.
But I had the Incon kit (with much smaller different turbos) on a stock motor LS1. Boost was 10psi and 520rwhp. that is alot for a bolt on power adder on 94 pump gas. As harlan said "the Incons with the gates wired close only go to 12.5psi and in the upper RMP spike fast to 16psi but then right back down".
I just know of a few people personaly and some on LS1TECH that had lots of problems. But I am glad to hear they are fixed.
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
From: F.H,Waterford,Port Huron, MI
Originally Posted by osuhunter07
o yeah, btw you car with the same mods as my car put down 5 hp more and 5 more TQ than mine.....................
Not impressed
Not impressed
And the mods on my car have more than changed a little from then. **** I didn't even have the car that way for more than 60days before we rebuilt it bigger!
Originally Posted by GreenGoblin956
well that predator guy is locally here and he put down a whooping 12.4 with that much rwhp :LOL:
